Changa: The Evolution of Ayahuasca

changabig.jpg

This article is the introductory page of the Changa web site found at www.changaevolution.blogspot.com 



It has been well over 53 years since Ayahuasca's (also known as cipó, caapi, hoasca, vegetal, daime, oni, yajé, natem, mama, Shori, and aya affectionately by westerners) introduction to western entheogen enthusiasts, and in that time Ayahuasca has evolved. What began as a synergistic plant combo known as Ayahuasca among specific cultures of the Amazon rain forest, has evolved to become something never seen before in the history of entheogens. Ayahuasca has transformed and become something new, radically different from what it once was. The sacred medicine that has historically provided incredible transformations in those who drink it has itself transformed. It has become Changa.

Changa is quite possibly one of the most amazing innovations in the technology of the sacred in our lifetime. The smoking blend is a combination of banisteriopsis caapi leaves (commonly known as the ayahuasca vine) and a natural extract of DMT. Ayahuasca itself is a tea of B. Caapi vine sections boiled down with perhaps other medicinal or psychoactive admixtures and a DMT, or 5meo-DMT-containing admixture plant, often Psychotria Viridis or Chacruna. Since the advent of western exploration of what has been called the ayahuasca effect or the ayahuasca complex, many new botanicals have been utilized and added to make a powerful brew that creates the ayahuasca effect. The ayahuasca effect is simply the inhibition of enzymes in the body that normally degrade ingested DMT, allowing the DMT to pass though the body altering consciousness without being destroyed by the body's enzymes.

Through the hard and potentially dangerous work of back yard shamans and amature ethnobotanists, many plants have been discovered that have the alkaloids necessary to produce the ayahausca effect. Synthesized laboratory grade chemicals have also been used to produce this effect, creating what some have called pharmahuasca, and what some purists call an abomination. Nevertheless, entheogen researchers have found that the plants and chemicals needed to produce ayahuasca are far reaching and can be found in many plants around the world.

One of the plants that has been discovered to have tryptamines suitable for creating the ayahausca effect is of the Acacia species. Acacia species that have good sums of DMT alkaloids in them are endemic to Australia, which is where Ayahuasca has "mutated" so to speak, evolving into what has been called Changa today. The production of DMT from natural sources has become quite simple, and due to the glory of kitchen chemistry quite a "green" process, no longer dependant upon ecologically harmful chemicals. According to Australian sources however, the availability of plants and chemicals needed to bring about the ayahuasca effect was slim. This was due to a ban on the importation of harmala containing plants in Australia. Any dried or harvested harmala containing plants in Australia carry the same offense as possession of heroin; magically however, live plants were legal and soon cuttings of plants and rooted plants where being bought sold and traded for personal consumption. This was a stark contrast to elsewhere on the globe where B. Caapi was easily bought and sold from online vendors in dry large quantities just ready for the brewing. Harmala containing plants thus being illegal, harvested and dried provided an interesting challenge to Australians, who like many entheogen enthusiasts found in their travels to South America the mind blowing and healing ayahuasca tea. For those that discovered the amazing medicine and spiritual path of ayahuasca, these people began to see how the vine interweaves with their authentic needs for meaning, health and well being. For some working with ayahausca became a necessity, but not an easily accessible one.

Before the ban of these dried plants and their live importation as well as the chemicals harmine, harmaline and tetrahydroharmine in Australia, some of the plants had made it over the sea and were being grown discretely by private parties with a vested interest in these plants of power. Sadly though, there was not enough Caapi vine to go around for all who needed this medicine, and seeing how DMT was easily available, some thing had to be done... necessity, so they say, is the mother of invention.

The story of Changa's discovery is clouded and a bit mysterious due to the legal ramifications of Changain Oz. Australians had been trying to keep this under their hats for some time. So the story goes... Someone in Australia discovered that if one infused the leaves of B. Caapi with DMT naturaly extracted from Acacia trees, that it could be smoked to form a totally new and undiscovered way of creating the ayahuasca effect. People had been taking Harmala alkaloids from Syrian Rue and B. Caapi with their DMT sessions in various forms for a very long time, but this was different... This was dramatically different.

Eventually Changa became known in other parts of the world, and its herbal blends started to adapt to the plants available locally or legally through botanical vendors. Now that the word is out, entheogenic explorers and back yard shamans are developing ways of relating to this sacred medicine. What is being formed is completely unique to its own dynamic of being smoked, but still very much influenced from what has been learned from Vegetalismo and Curenderismo practices in South America. A new form of shamanry is being practiced and learned from practicing with these plant teachers. A new entheogenic healing modality, new rituals, new ways of relating to ceremonial structure and the role of the healer as well are beginning to shift and transform -- each adapting to the authentic needs of those working with this medicine.

The qualities of the tea are much different than the qualities of the Changa smoking blend, as is drinking or sublingual administration of harmala alkaloids prior to smoking DMT.  The tea is drunk and enzymes begin to be inhibited in the stomach, then the effect spreads throughout the body. Changa -- who's route of administration is smoking -- works very differently. The pyrolyzed smoking blend is inhaled, adsorbing into the lungs and going directly to the brain. In the brain the alkaliods inhibit enzymes directly, adding the unique effects of harmala alkaliods to the synergistic effects of the tryptamine harmala pharmacological relationship. The effects are faster, clearer headed, and more centering according to Changaleros (those who practice the way of smoke), with less to no nausea unless one is working with it to physically purge. The purge from Changa is more or less a matter of personal intention than physical reaction. 

According to cosmologist Brain Swimme, the entire universe is evolving; solar systems, planets, single cell organisms, plants, animals, cultures, spiritual practices, technologies, all systems evolve and move towards a deepening of complexity -- and plant-human relational systems are no different. Could it be that the plant-human relationship of the complex plant, chemical, neurophysiological relationship we have come to know as ayahausca has evolved as well?


The Evolution of Ayahuasca 

Evolution: ev·o·lu·tion
1. A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. See Synonyms at development.
a. The process of developing.
b. Gradual development.

When people speak of ayahuasca, they are not generally speaking of the vine B. Caapi. They are generally speaking of the synergistic complex of two or more plants that has come to be known as ayahuasca. On the one hand a step in ayahuasca's evolution was its moving out of the rainforest. Researchers like Johnathan Ott helped us to see that there were many plants that brought about this "ayahuasca effect." This next step out of the jungle was called the ayahausca analog -- plants with similar chemicals being worked with to produce the "ayahausca effect," which some say is the inner voice phenomenon that seems to be particular to this entheogenic synergy.

Some researchers pointed out that this same effect could be created with lab chemicals or even some pharmaceuticals currently used as antidepressants. The next step was in working past the oral route of administration combining the smoking of tryptamines with the smoking of beta-carbolines, which have been found to be many times more potent and effective with fewer side effects smoked. This has become the next development, the next evolutionary step for the synergistic shamanic technology and "entity" we have come to know as ayahuasca. As I mentioned earlier, ayahuasca is not just the vine. Though it is the vine's name, many people when referring to ayahausca are referring to the shamanic technology that is ayahausca as well as the synergy of plants and chemicals that combine to form what some have perceived as a powerful and unique being in and of itself. This being is a unique synergistic hybridization of human and plant relationships who most view as a feminine being that can be of great help to you in healing, learning and personal growth.

Ayahuasca is ayahuasca to us because of our relationship to it and how we relate to it. The way of relating to ayahuasca has evolved, it has changed, it has developed into something new and unique in its own right. It has evolved into Changa. Here though I would like to make a note on the notion that evolution includes the value judgement "better." Many people would look at an organism and see its perfection as it is. As this organism evolved, would anyone look at what it evolved from and say "Oh this organism is so much better than what it evolved from!"? Probably not. So how would the word "better" apply here in regard to ayahuasca's transformation from tea to smoke? Honestly better is certainly a value judgement based on personal bias, however there could be debates and agreements on the notion that ayahuasca's evolution into Changa in Australia was a better option than brewing tea and running out of Caapi vine because it was in limited amounts and no new vine was allowed via importation. To the people who developed Changa, this was a "better" option. This better option also allowed them to explore both Caapi and DMT space in ways that had never really been done before, allowing for adaptation and innovation, and thus diversity. The increase in complexity as well as the increase in diversity is often looked at in science as "better," or let's say a more effective strategy for survival, growth and development.

The question remains however in terms of qualitative value judgements indicated by the statement that ayahausca has evolved. Is Changa better then ayahausca? That may be a matter of personal opinion and preference... however perhaps not, it is possible that Changa maybe the most effective and adaptive strategy for working with local and or locally grown admixture plants around the world, thus limiting the need for exportation/importation of plants from the Amazon.

Changa could possibly be, if one looks at the concept of psychointigrator plants, a way for local plants, or plants grown locally to aid in human synergistic relationships with place just as these plants have done for the peoples of the amazon. Time will tell...

We are one . . .

 

Artwork by the author, used by permission. 

Comments

For more info...

For more information please check out the web page! Glad to have this published on reality sandwich!  http://changaya.blogspot.com

-

Ayahuasca has not "become changa".

That is a very misleading statement.

IMHO

The idea that changa has evolved out of ayahuasca is pretty inflammatory to people who are really devoted to ayahausca. It has been a very controversial topic among ayahuasca enthusiasts. The idea that it has become changa is equally controversial to some. I expect that many people will disagree with the notion, your entitled to your opinion and I really do not feel the need to defend or debate the idea. I do not feel that this notion is misleading personally neither do people who really appreciate working with changa either. Information on changa as well as the link to the site was not even allowed to be posted for quite some time on the ayahuasca forum! It created quite the stir, and I suspect it will continue to do so where ever people who are very interested in ayahuasca meet with this notion. I also suggest reading the entire site before passing judgment, as well as perhaps trying changa itself. Respectfully... chenchoso

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

-

Changa as an entity is a good thing.

But to call it The Evolution of Ayahuasca, or to state, for example, that leaves are commonly known as vines, is just plain incorrect.

So, perhaps it's not about changa, but the way you choose to promote and discuss this topic that causes such inflammation.

 

Thank you for your criticism

I agree my writing style is not very strong, and I thank your for your criticism. There is always room for improvement!As I said many people disagree with the notion that changa is the evolution of ayahuasca. I disagree that it isn't, and have communicated why I feel this way on the site. I do not think that how I am communicating is causing the inflammation so to speak but how the idea strikes the personal bias of the reader.  I am not saying that the vine itself has evolved. The human relationship with the vine and the chemicals found else where in nature that we have come to call ayahuasca, ayahuasca analogs ect... has evolved. I feel that ayahuasca as it is traditionally exists due to its relationship with humans in the first place; it is a product of human/nature synergy and mutualism. That relationship is what makes ayahuasca ayahuasca, and that its self has changed, evolved, and become something very different.

 

I suspect though that the notion will illicit strong responses, especially for those that have not worked with it. or worked with it properly from what we have noticed on the Nexus. As i mentioned though I do not feel the need to debate these points or defend my own ideas so much as inspire people to explore these thoughts and perhaps through their own investigation discover something new!  

http://changaya.blogspot.com

very interesting indeed

This is such an interesting development - thank you for the very well formulated and rich information!

-

-

-

I'm not against various methods, and have no issue with changa, per se. But this is not "well forumlated information".

For example: "The smoking blend is a combination of banisteriopsis caapi leaves (commonly known as the ayahuasca vine)..."

The Caapi leaves are certainly not commonly known as the ayahuasca vine.

That's like saying strawberry leaves are commonly known as the berry.

Ok well you got me there...

Ok well you got me there... it could have been edited more clearly; sadly I do not have a proof reader. But you’re right that could have been said differently. I appreciate your criticism. As a matter of fact seeing how Changa is still in the leaps and bounds of research by psychonaughts world wide, people are discovering that Changa can be made in many ways other then with Caapi leaf, it is also made with the vine, which some prefer. New Changa blends are being created with Syrian Rue as well as Passion Flower extract bought from the local herbalist. This was written however prior to some of these new combinations being worked with out there. The majority of the research being done on this is coming from people working with these blends on the DMT-Nexus forum, a really great community of explorers!  http://changaya.blogspot.com

Evolution meanders - and aborts many experiments

Important point that plant-based technologies of the sacred follow the same evolutionary principles as everything else. This means that evolutionary experimentation will occur--as is occuring with this changa--and most of those experiments will be abandoned by evolution. "Evolution meanders as much as it progresses."

Changa is building on the knowledge from two major evolutionary discoveries: (1) the discovery of the caapi/viridis synergistic combination by the ayahuasca pioneers (the birth of ayahuasca itself), and (2) the discovery by Western science that DMT is potentiated by MAOIs--no matter where the DMT or the MAOI comes from.

This data provides amazing opportunities for contemporary plant-spirit explorers to discover ever more effective and useful tools based on the discovery of the abstract DMT-MAOI combo. It is indeed an evolution of the original ayahuasca technology, and purists who a priori oppose such exploration can say what they will . . . 

But these new ways of applying the DMT/MAOI synergy must be treated as evolutionary experiments--and again, evolution meanders; changa may be left in the dust and forgotten.

Then again, it may catch on and transcend the brew that birthed it, providing a new way for the voice and vision of the tryptamine to integrate better into our urban non-tribal-jungle-shaman context.

WELL SAID!

Well said there Linkx! I wish I could just give you a great big hug right now!

Exactly! You summerized my point perfectly... Thank you.

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

It feels as if there is a

It feels as if there is a lot of hesitance for people when it comes to the evolution or ayahuasca that I am proposing. As I said I think Linkx surmised it perfectly... and Synergist had an excellent point as well.

 

I am usually full of apt analogies, which annoy my freinds often enough, and so I have been working with trying to come up with analogies for what I am communicating with the evolution of ayahuasca that would hopfully reduce the negative reaction it often gets by people who have never worked with it but have worked with ayahuasca exstensively.

 

One point I would really like to make is that changa is still ayahuasca or an ayahuasca analog depending on what plants are added to make it, syrian rue and passion flower has been added to it in the place of caapi leaf or infused caapi vine smoking herbs. In a dream last night I was told to point this out, it is still ayahuasca, but it is ayahuaasca in a new form. It is a new way of relating to ayahuasca, and it has a new name, it has been named changa. But it is still ayahuasca or an ayahuasca analog but a smokable form. Changa can be made with all of the same traditional plants that ayahuasca is made of. Changa blends have been made of caapi vine and chalipoonga or an extract there of for example, with mapacho and agua de florida added to it as well.

 

And now its time for one of my lame attempts at creating an analogy and I hope that it works lol...

 

What I see here as the evolution of ayahuasca to changa is analogous to this... Martin Luther initiated the evolution of christiantiy with the protestant reformation. The protestant reformation was the evolution of catholicism, creating a new way of relating to christ and the old religion. Just as catholics and protastants are different they both come from the same source and are both christian... lets learn from their example and not fight over who is right and what is the proper way... because they are both christian.   

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

WOW they still sell Ugg

WOW they still sell Ugg boots!

 

On a funny note a link to this article was put on the Daily Grail, with a really funny point added to it...

Changa for those that do not know is spanish for monkey, it is also  swahili for mix or blend just as kinikinik.

So when you look at the title of this article as well as the web site it is a bit funny... the translation would be...

"Monkey: the evolution of ayahuasca"

I love it! Thanks to those at the daily grail for pointing that out!

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

How deep does it go?

Changa is pretty popular at doofs (raves) in Australia. I wonder how a short-lived 'airy' changa dose can compare to the transformational and visceral effects of an ayahuasca ceremony with an experienced curandero... It appears to me that there is a lot more space for profound intentional work to be done with the ayahuasca brew.

I would hate to see the use of these plants trivialised in the way that salvia has been since it gained widespread popularity as something to smoke. The traditional use of salvia divinorum is by chewing, which gives a less intense and longer lasting journey which people say is more conducive to learning & healing.

To say that changa is the 'evolution' of ayahuasca could be likened to saying that whiskey is the evolution of beer. True, it's a more highly processed material, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's going to do you more good. (The analogy between alcohol and aya is maybe not the most suitable one to draw, but you get my meaning I hope). 

But I do appreciate your point, ie: that changa could be a more efficient way for people outside the jungle to make contact with the Amazonian plant medicines.

Bye & bless!

The way of smoke....

There are quite a few presumptions that people seem to have about changa..."Changa is pretty popular at doofs (raves) in Australia. I wonder how a short-lived 'airy' changa dose can compare to the transformational and visceral effects of an ayahuasca ceremony with an experienced curandero... It appears to me that there is a lot more space for profound intentional work to be done with the ayahuasca brew. " 

For one many people have been selling and confusing changa with dmt enhanced leaf all over the place recently... smoking blends that have DMT in it and not harmalas at all. These are not changa at all... Actual changa is not a short lived "airy" experience. It could be if it was made to be that way and smoked in very small amounts... but I have had a very light tea of ayahuasca could cause euphoria and little else. Changa made with sufficient amounts of harmalas can be smoked for hours and hours with no built up tolerance which can allow for a lot of work to get done ceremonially in one night. Allowing for "profound intentional work" to get done. The transformational and visceral effects are also present... If one needs to heal and focus on the purge one can and the changa will provide that. There are reports on the web page of a man who smoked while feeling suicidal and it saved his life, and changed his life.

 

As far as the evolution debate goes i think that Linkx put it nicely... 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

Excellent to see this on RS!

I have found myself visiting sites like www.dosenation.com and the above mentioned www.dmt-nexus.com/forum/ for RS's lack of detailed entheogen related discussions.

 

In the spirit of evolution and discovery, I say the "Ayahuasca experience" should not be restricted to the B. Caapi Vine alone. There are subtle differences with every variation, of course, but the specific B. Caapi Vine plus Psychotria Viridis leaf, the classic Ayahuasca mix, shouldn't be held up as the only useful one.

 

I find the shorter acting Changa to be a useful reminder that the world around us, at all times, is full of consciousness, whether or not we are aware enough to feel it and see it. In a similar vein of experimentation, the Mimosa Hostilis plus Syrian Rue combo is an incredibly potent Ayahuasca analogue, and quite a bit easier to prepare.

 

Also many have found the addition of Salvia Divinorum to Changa to be a welcome "opener." On the note of Acacia species being grown around the world for these purposes, there are many useful analogous plants, including ones that grow in the Northern Hemisphere such as Desmanthus species and Phalaris grasses. (Which are both perfectly legal.)

 

If people are really into spreading this movement in a sustainable way, growing these ethnobotanicals and gaining a deep understanding of them, is vital.

The force is strong in this one!

Welcome Jedi! Thanks for contributing!There has been a rather puritist way of looking at ayahuasca that has developed over the years as access to amazonian ethnobotanicals has increased, leaving research into ayahuasca analogs to fall slightly to the way side. This is really unfortunate because the social and ecological impact of importation is very high and unnecessary when local alternatives can be worked with effectively.  part of the attraction to Changa in the first place for me personaly was that it opened up the possibility for a more sustainable and local entheogenic culture to develop. If we look at the concept of psychointigrator plants for example local entheogenic plants can aid us in the psychological integration into living in a higher state of synergy with our ecosystems and with each other. From an ecopsychology perspective our larger biotic community is our larger self, and locally grown or native entheogenic plants have been called the communicator species of a biotic community, allowing humans access to knowledge that increases their level of synergistic and mutalistic life ways.  

 

There have been reports of people finding Tribulus terrestris is growing beneath Desmanthus bushes in the mid west. Its right there... its all around us! Or it could be with a few seeds and some love. But more research needs to be done. Tribulus terrestris for example has not been adequately confirmed as a proper harmala source yet. It also needs more research in changa use. But that requires people actually doing the research! That is simply not going to get done if we continue to import all of our ethnobotanicals.

 

more research is starting to get done on phalaris grasses too once this research hits its apex... we are going to see drastic changes in this work! 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 "Drinking Ayahuasca is one thing and Smoking DMT another"

 

This is true... but changa is not just smoking DMT either, it is also smoking ayahuasca or a harmala containing plant. Passion flower for example. I suppose one might say it is also an evolution of smoking DMT as well.

 

 "Changa is for People who live in the Big Citys whom have no Time or even no Idea neither Connection to get Ayahuasca"

 

I am not really sure about that... it would seem that there are a great many of people in the country that like growing or harvesting their own plants to make changa with, and there are a great many of people in cities having ayahuasca ceremonies these days. So I do not think that either ayahausca or changa can be locked down to either urban or rural dwellers.

 

I agree that changa gives you a look behind the curtain, and quickly as well. For a lot of people it is moving them through their process of healing really quickly and intigrating them into unitative states of conciounsess and egolessness with out providing a lot of drama... a very particular changa blend made with chalipoonga leaf and stems has been reported to provide this experience quite regularly with multiple people.

 

I think its a lovely notion that Changa wishes to awaken the multidimensional being we are.

 

I think Changa is going to be a lot of things to a lot of people, which is shaped by how we relate to it. Which is the same for ayahuasca, and many other entheogens.   

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

Changa as evolution of Ayahuasca

This is not to belittle the Changa experience in anyway but if you are happy and secure with what Changa brings you then why would you feel the need to say that Changa is the evolution of Ayahyasca. Do Changa users want to ride on the coat tails of Ayahuasca, a ceremonial practice that is thousands of years old. Changa is only a few years in existence. I'm not a purist but I think "evolution" is the wrong word to use; look at the definition. The Ayahuasca ceremony isn't changing. Changa seems more a spin-off of smoking DMT, which really isn't that bad a relative. And why would you want to create a divide between Ayhauasca practitioners and Changa users? I cant see any good that will come of it.

hmmm?

"This is not to belittle the Changa experience in anyway but if you are happy and secure with what Changa brings you then why would you feel the need to say that Changa is the evolution of Ayahyasca." 

 

I really do not follow that statement... 

 

"Do Changa users want to ride on the coat tails of Ayahuasca, a ceremonial practice that is thousands of years old."

 

 I have no idea, and I do not think that there is any implication that they would or wouldnt 

"I'm not a purist but I think "evolution" is the wrong word to use; look at the definition. " 

 

I have looked at the definition, and I think that Linkx made a good point about that notion already. I really do not see how it is the wrong word to use. Things evolve... its a part of nature!

 

 "The Ayahuasca ceremony isn't changing." 

 

It has quite a bit! It has changed with the addition of catholic influences for one, ( I have seen catholic saints invoked in Shipibo ceremonies and felt their presence and healing) which is relatively new to the ayahuasca ceremony. AB. Caapi is also being used as a religious sacrement in three ( at the least) totally new religions. Which is to say that the relationship to ayahausca is changing from its traditional animist contexts to a westernized church context. How we are working with ayahuasca and its analogs now has also changed, it has changed into changa a smokable form of ayahuasca or ayahuasca analogs. 

 

"Changa seems more a spin-off of smoking DMT, which really isn't that bad a relative. " 

 

 Again, changa is not smoking just DMT, it is making a smokable ayahausca analog, just to make it simpler to explain. 

 

"And why would you want to create a divide between Ayhauasca practitioners and Changa users? I cant see any good that will come of it."

 

 There is no intention of creating a divide between ayahuasca practitioners and changa users in fact many of them are the same people. I personally cannot see how one could see a divide there unless one wished to create one in their own thinking. But there is nothing above that would attempt to facilitate such a divide. To state that ayahuasca has evolved is to state the obvious, as I believe Linkx pointed out clearly.

 

Technologies evolve over time, and what we call ayahuasca is indeed, in a way, a shamanic technology. This does not mean that ayahuasca is outdated, or to be left behind or that it is inferior in any way to what it has evolved into. In some ways however the evolution of ayahuasca to ayahausca anologs then to changa is a step in a dirrection that allows more people to have access to the benifical effects that ayahuasca has traditionally offered to people.

Some of the interesting novel differences in smoking changa to drinking ayahuasca or just smoking DMT alone is that it provides a clear headed and grounded experience that is self moderated and does not require as much support from a curandero or religious group or leader. These are considered by some to be great advantages. By others though it may not be considered an advantage. People will have their personal bias and choose to explore working with one over another. I have seen traditional students of shipibo ayahuasca practitioners at first wary of changa to find that it offered them something new and wonderful that they then later preffered over ayahuasca for some intentions, and yet preffered ayahuasca for yet other intentions.

 

 

  http://changaya.blogspot.com

chnaga and the globalhuasca mutations

Hi, I enjoyed your article because it stimulates debate and discussion on the evolution of ayahuacsa, the "phramausaca" analogues and what i have called the "globalhuasca" evolution and mutations... I personally know the bush alchemist who claims to have invented changa - I call him "Theo Valis" in my book Aya: A Shamanic Odyssey (http://www.ayathebook.com) to preserve his anonymity, and yes, changa is DMT-lite, not the full immersive entheo sacred experience, it makes it more recreational but also opens up pathways for more people to experience those realms.. unfortunately most then want to just stay in the shallow end of the wading pool... You all might be interested in the recent podcast interview I conducted with Dennis mCkenna where we talk about these ayahuasca analogues, "globalhuasca" and the commodification and simplification of the shamanic ayahuasca experience into western forms, even 'ayahuasca in a pill' which has cropped up recently! xx rak see: http://in-a-perfect-world.podomatic.com/entry/2010-05-04T14_32_27-07_00 A seminal interview with Dennis McKenna, Ph.D on the evolution of ayahuasca and the entheogenic movement and the imminent tipping point on planet earth the movement parallels. In which experiential journalist Rak Razam quizzes Dennis on his role as a scientist and a leading ayahuasca researcher, while Dennis waxes lyrical on bio-piracy, the proliferating business of shamanism in Peru and around the world, and the urgent need for integration of the plant teacher experience in people's everyday lives to truly make a difference. Is the sacrament of ayahuasca becoming commercialized? As pharmahuasca – and the startling development of ayahuasca in a pill form – spreads beyond the vine itself, is the wisdom of globaluasca transcending its Gaian roots to connect with a new generation without the plant dogma? Is the future a religious, compartmentalized Entheogenic Evangelism? Or will lodges transform into "psychedelic monasteries" training plant Jedis? Its been ten years now since Dennis' brother Terence passed on, and Dennis deconstructs some of his theories, from Timewave Zero to the Singularity and provides a critical analysis of the 2012 phenomenon and the unfolding Archaic Revival... {why do green things reach for the sun?}

Hey nice interview Rak

Dennis is quite a bit more skeptical and less poetic and not as bold as Terrence, but he has a nice grounded view. I found it interesting that he thought Terrence would say something like, "everything's going according to plan" or "we're right where we need to be." Those aren't direct quotes but something to that effect. I feel that as well, that it's always exactly perfect. 

 

 I also appreciated how you brought up the time/rate of change acceleration, which to me is the heart of the 2012 matter, and hard to ignore. He can debate about specific points of novelty, but it's hard to say that novelty, in general isn't speeding up, especially considering the acceleration of technology, as well as, I think, the incredible rate of spiritual development that people can have with entheogens. 

 

 Finally the best point, one that I've been considering a lot, was the convergence of technology and spirituality - maybe the technology that lets us gain access to all of human knowledge and experience, (the zero-point field) is not a physical chip in our brains, but the 5-Meo-DMT and/or DMT that is already there! James Oroc's book deals with this a bit. Great point!

hey shazaman!   Thats

hey shazaman!

 

Thats great you know the claimed discoverer of changa! I have heard of a few. gracie and Zarkov really started the public intrest in it and in some ways could be the originators of it... but changa as we know it today does belong to the austrilians. Which i think is just awesome.

 

I love the globahuasca phenomena! I think that has been goin gon for a long long time. Ott really pointed out to us in his early book ayahuasca anlogs that what is needed for ayahuasca is all around us. As soon as people started to focus more on ethnobotanical importation however the research and interest in ayahuasca analogs began to wane... which is what is so interesting about what happened down in OZ. Oz was not able to import dried ethnbotanicals that have harmalas in them... this created the inovation that is changa.

 

"Or will lodges transform into "psychedelic monasteries" training plant Jedis?"

 

I tend to think this is a great idea... we need more jedis! ;) 

 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

Wow... I just have no idea

Wow... I just have no idea how to respond to that but I thank you for your comments.

 

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

A little correction

Ayahuasca has not evolved into Changa. Changa evolved from Ayahuasca. There's a difference.

 

But great article anyways :) 

I thank you infinitely for

I thank you infinitely for your correction...

Blessings

 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

You know changa can last as

You know changa can last as long as you can, it can go from 45 minutes to 6 hours depending on how you go about working with it. After a while of smoking... you can actually start up again after an hour and just keep going. I tend to think of it as surfing, you can either ride the wave to shore or keep on riding the wave down the coast by kicking up from time to time by smoking more.

There is an art to it and if you don't figure it out your going to have amuch different experience with it. It also depends on if you are working with a 10x caapi leaf extract with your blend. Or ratherr to say decent enough quantity of harmals in your blend. That really makes the world of differance in the effects.

 

 

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

I really do not see that

I really do not see that there is much of a possability for changa to be really recreational persay... enjoyable, yes, but enjoyable like a really hard work out that is really really healthy for you, if hard work and a great challange is your type of recreation, it always has been mine, then yes. If what is enjoyable is not a vice but a virtue I dont see the problem with that.

 

Also smoking changa is bringing into ones body a very alive and sentient being that can and does very litterally communicate with you. Just as ayahausca and its analogs create the "voice in the head phenomena" so does changa. It becomes fairly apherent that by smoking it you are introducing a sentient being into your body, in that case it is no different then the tea.

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

Also... It tends not to be

Also... It tends not to be alien or like smoking DMT at all. It is also not like drinking ayahuasca... it is I would say it own thing, which I feel makes it very interesting.

IMHO it feels very clear headed and grounded when made with celio caapi leaf. Celio caapi leaf has no harmaline in it just Tetrahydroharmine and harmine which are much more stimulating and clear headed with little foggy intoxication. Other people make changa from many other sources, vine, passion flower extract and rue and each has its own quality.

The art of making changa blends is pretty amazing and achemical and each blend is going to have its own unique qualities depending on which admixtures are added. This makes it difficult to nail Changa down as one thing or another.

 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

You are right it does boil

You are right it does boil down to personal responsability as well as intention I beleive...

Ayahuasca itself can be used with very poor intentions to harm or kill others, manipulate others, and to distrupt other peoples lives for example, the practice of doing so in south america is often called brujeria. It maybe a sacred medicine to some but to others it is a way to get what they desire no matter what the cost. My point being that intention and personal responsability makes an entheogen what it is to you. This is what is called a relationship, or how one relates. If one does not speak to changa or listen to changa and treats it as a drug... it will not speak to you. You will probably not hear its voice, and you will not receive its guidance. The same happens with ayahausca.  

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

Cosmicsol23 so far people

Cosmicsol23 so far people have communicated fairly nicely here with each other. It would be great to see that continue!

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

Some how i understand

Some how i understand cosmicsol23 reaction!! I know this is a place for fair and nice talk, but ITS A BIG RESPONSABILITY TO RELEASE INFORMATION!! I wanted to congratulate the site for being very updated about the matters released, but you have to really take care about what you are saying. Would be much more reasonable to attach to trustable information, and if you dont have so much, just stop. You talk about smoking imaos with dmt(changa mix) right? So, you should check if metacarbolines(imoas) are possible to smoke. I Tryied and i dont find trustfull information, there is a chance its not working like this. So my point of wiew is: Its all about doses. The intensity of the dmt experience can be controlled better with changa, so we can have more conscience about what is going on, also we can choose to step foward, wich makes a big diference betwen being surprised with a rollercoaster of color and information. Basically i share most the point of view of cosmicsol23 and the way you comented his post, you twisted his information in your point of view. Try to be more open to other peoples opinions, mainly in this so new,  metaphisic and magic matter wich is changa!

 

 

response ability

Honestly I think, there was perhaps some language difficulty there that may have caused some misunderstanding of what was being communicated. I really cannot understand how or why you would feel his point of view was "twisted".  Changa is not really new at all either its been around for at least ten years in Australia as my Ozzy friends will remind me.

 

There has been a lot learned about changa, and how and why it works why it does what it does during that time. Also its been even longer since the advent of smoking harmalas to promote the "ayahuasca effect" as it has been called. Gracie and Zarkov wrote about their experiences with ingesting/smoking caapi, rue and passion flower on deoxy.org, which is linked on the site that this article comes from. Their experiences perhaps first really motivated changas emergence IMHO.  They where the first to report the ayahuasca " voice phenomena" from smoking harmalas during mushroom journeys as well.  Also on the site there is a link to an EROWID post in which Dennis Mckenna explains to John Hannah how smoking changa works. Links to this information is available to the reader on the changa site itself.

 

 I think most of us would agree that Dennis Mckenna is a fairly trusted source of information on the subject. 

 

Dennis Mckenna explained in that article that changa worked and worked effectively by directly inhibiting MAO in the brain instead of indirectly through ingesting in the gut. Less harmalas need to be ingested in order to make this happen which also means less harmala body load. This allows DMT to work with harmalas synergistically just as it does with ayahuasca but directly to the brain, bypassing the digestive system ect ect... just as one can drink more ayahuasca and receive a boost in effects as well as an increase in duration one can increase the intensity, and duration of the experience by smoking more changa. The duration of the changa can last for hours if continuously smoked and a level platue can be achieved for hours, which cannot be done by controlling the dose as you hypothesize. DMT will build, without the presence of a maoi, a rapid tolerance, not allowing one to continue smoking it with increasing effects for hours at a time.  

 

There is quite a bit of trustable information available through links on the site. One of these is the DMT nexus and the DMT nexus Wiki, there are many people there who are, to be fair, expert amateurs and some just straight up scientists doing some incredible research on their own. Not to mention quite a few bioassays that support that harmalas are indeed smokable with effects felt even if smoked alone without the presence of a tryptamine.   

 

I pray that cleared up any misunderstandings for you.

 

  http://changaya.blogspot.com

Yes! Of course its effects

Yes! Of course its effects us, but its clear enough, in the sources you meant, the difference between ingesting and smoking maois are too big for you to compare ayauasca with it. Remembering you changa is an Ozzy creation makes things even more far from ayauasca, that comes from south america. About NEW, of course changa is NEW, if you consider that the modern use of smoking dmt comes from before 60s, and i believe changa is unknown for many people. And, by experience, its not fair to say  changa is the evolution of ayauasca. Changa is a human evolution, and comes from many different cultures together, guided by a higher power. So that´s for me the point of misunderstanding, and no, all information you meant gave me less reasons to understand why you decided to call it The evolution of ayauasca, but there you go, its your text not mine!

Also good to remember that  tribes from Australia consume dmt in their rituals in very big doses, different plants for men and women, witch  means they have a large knowledge about it. Australia has big forest of acacia trees, and many other sources of dmt, probably some are unknown. Seems to me that changa bush scientists(my friends) from Ozzy were involved with Aborigenas and acacias and maybe this is the spiritual base/source for changa. Would be great to have a matter about it in RS!   

Good luck! 

Hello to the oneness...

Hello to the oneness...  

As I pointed out on the site my view is that ayahuasca as we know it is a shamanic technology, I am not reffering to B. Caapi evolving but the shamanic technology that we call ayahuasca that is a syngeristic complex of plants in relationship with humans. Ayahuasca would not be ayahuasca as we know if human did not take these plants and combine them together. In this I reffer to ayahuasca the tea combo of b. caapi and viridis or chalipoonga ect. It is not the vine of souls its self evolving but the human relationship that makes ayahuasca as know of it today, a complex syngeristic plant human relationship. So I think your partially right in saying that changa is a human evolution, but that it is a mutalistic and synergistic plant/human evolution, I think the plants were in on the deal as well ; )

 

Also as I pointed out in the site which this article comes from the "ozzies" discovered changa through taking the leaves of B. Caapi and combining them with acacia resins and extracts. So the ayahuasca itself is growing and being grown in Oz.

 

I have several good freinds who are aboriginal austrilians they are not aware of their traditions including the ingestion of any entheogens so much, but there are many tribes. Do you know which tribes ingest large doses of DMT in their ceremonies. I would be very interested in seeing any research on that subject.

 

Thank you for the wish of good luck... blessings 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

Ok, most of the information,

Ok, most of the information, i have about changa came from my friends from Ozzy. Its very interesting the fact that many people claim to be the one who evolved changa! Also my friends do! Anyway here come their version: Happened by chance! In a hot party their dmt became liquid and spread all over the little box, well  

my friend (she is an older woman) clean the mess with herbs for smoking she had with her (no B. caapi leaves involved, anyway most of the betacarbolines from the B. caapi stay at the vinewood). The mix burned very well and the effects were still really strong. As a old woman, she aways wanted to have the benefits of smoking dmt, but the process its sometimes to intense. So she mixed more herbs in to the "original mix" and got in to the changa point. Even they claim to receive the name changa! Well about native culture of Ozzy, this is a quite misterious matter. Books like "Mutant messages down under" Marlo Morgan, and "Crystal Woman" Lynn Andrews are fiction but " the cultural aspects of information describing ceremonies, food gathering, bush medicine, and cultural materials used as descriptions of personal experience can be found vividly illustrated in text written by anthropologist and scientific researchers."

If you say you are in touch with aborigines and they say to you they don't know about, maybe they are too far from their culture or they just don't want to share this with you. Took ages for my friend to be able to share one dmt ritual with the old women from a certain tribe. Its forbidden to do such rituals with withe people. Indeed was a very special situation and she was really surprised about the intensity of the experience. 

My experience in amazon is: Its very hard to get in touch with a tribe that make use of ayauasca, many from then just don't know about. And many tribes just don't want to do it with withe man.

About the distortion of the therm ayauasca(holy wine), the same happened with the therm shamanism(Cyberia). Well this language situation happens because there is a need to create therms to describe modern landscapes generated by the "new" interactions between humans, "reality" and nature. 

Thats interesting. I love

Thats interesting. I love the origin story of it being an old woman that first started mixing it together. Thats wonderful.

It would be fun to come up with as many urban legends as to its origin, as well as to have some creative new myths formed around its origin. That would just be great!

My aboriginal freinds are fairly open with me about their traditions and we have talked about entheogens and ethnobotanicals. I have learned soem things about some of their traditions but I cannot talk about them with out betraying their trust. But from what I have learned they do not work with DMT. They are very much intune with their culture and know much about many of the other tribes. But thats the thing... there are so many tribes... and one does not ever represent another. They are distinct cultures in and of their own right. But it does seem that their pituri did have some pretty good tropane alkaliods in them which are visionary.

I always wanted to try that...

 

   http://changaya.blogspot.com

I've tried it

Thank you Chen Cho Dorge for sharing this info with us and for your patience in responding to the comments. In my travels abroad I've had the opportunity to experience this wonderful medicine on several occasions. I think that you've said it all but I will comment in kind anyway. The most important factor in determining the quality of my experience is how I approach it. (Like all medicines of this kind) When accepted with gratitude, respect, and a humble request for healing, an inner teaching spirit arrives and communicates on a deep level. Paying close attention is a must or the teacher may be missed. The communication happens on such a deep level that there is a sense of oneness and of otherness with the teacher at the same time. I find it very important not to judge or evaluate the experience while it is happening. If you need to do that, do it later. Doing this will block all learning. This is the part of experience that is so close to the Ayahuasca experience. That is where the comparison is most important. The idea of evolution is usually applied to biology. I can see why some people have an issue with the term applied in this case. Not everyone views the idea of evolution the same and there can be different ways of applying it here. I personally don't have a problem with it. We could think of this as a type of peripatric speciation in which an organism enters a new niche and encounters a bottleneck. The bottleneck in this case would be the importation laws. We are One

Thank you

Thank you Synergist!

 

"When accepted with gratitude, respect, and a humble request for healing, an inner teaching spirit arrives and communicates on a deep level. Paying close attention is a must or the teacher may be missed"

 

This is so true.

 

"The communication happens on such a deep level that there is a sense of oneness and of otherness with the teacher at the same time."

 

The oneness and the other at the same time is so profound with this medicine especially, when attention is placed on that awareness...this is where I feel true synergy with spirit, with the plants, nature, and the totality really seems to arise. This the access point to shamanic ecstasty, and I think that this medicine especially really shows us that it is available to all of us if we do relate to it with gratitude, respect and a humble request for healing.

 

"The idea of evolution is usually applied to biology. I can see why some people have an issue with the term applied in this case. Not everyone views the idea of evolution the same and there can be different ways of applying it here. I personally don't have a problem with it. We could think of this as a type of peripatric speciation in which an organism enters a new niche and encounters a bottleneck. The bottleneck in this case would be the importation laws."

 

This is a very good point. Importation does seem to be the bottle neck that pushed this shamanic technology to grow a new branch on the ayahuasca family tree.

Well  said, I appricate your comments very much.

 

We are one indeed.

 

 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

A response by Ayahuasca.com

http://www.ayahuasca.com/ayahuasca-overviews/a-response-to-the-reality-s... This article responds that the definitions of Ayahuasca used in this article are without etymological, botanical or anthropological meaning.

Well Dan that is defintely a

Well Dan that is defintely a spin on what I am saying but not at all what I am saying either. But your welcome to your opinion about what I am saying none the less.

 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

spin cycle

I'm glad its full of spinning energy. Its the best I can give in terms of a thoughtful response to a thoughtful piece. In the spirit of collaboration. Perhaps it will elucidate where people may take you completely wrong.

Honestly Bruddha... only the

Honestly Bruddha... only the people from the ayahuasca forum seem to see my work as wrong.....

 

This was my response on your site.

 

 

"Actually changaya as the only word I could use for it when trying to get a name for the blog spot account as changa was taken up already. I never called it changaya... I believe that was you that called it that. It never referenced as such on the site out side of the address fro the blog.

There are so many things I could correct you on, or misconceptions I could attempt to clear up, and try to achieve more clarity in our mutual understanding of our opinions, but I am not sure that would make any real difference. The ayahuasca forum (which I used to be a moderator on) has a fairly focused political agenda in their view on DMT and its extraction. I have been told and in many private discussions on the ayahausca forum where this point was the focus. The extraction of DMT (even with lad grade green non-petrochemical D-Limmonene) if viewed as a threat to the legalization and legitimization of ayahuasca use in legalized religious settings. DMT is placed often times by the ayahuasca community as being some how sacrilegious, a drug, a profane chemical that has something to do with elves or some such thing. Any attempt to connect a extract of DMT with any part of B. Caapi would there for seem to be even doubly threatening to this politically motivated stance on DMT and its extracts, due to the fact that it is viewed as a potential threat to the ayahuasca churches and the ayahuasca community in general in their work to legitimize their spiritual practices out side of their South American origins. I personally view this entire article as politically motivated spin doctoring to create as much distance from changa and its extracted DMT sources as possible from traditional ayahuasca.  Makes me sad to see it honestly, I wish that people did not wish to see changa as some sort of division between tea and smoke. From my stance Changa is a smokable form of ayahuasca... But your are welcome to your opinions.
Blessings

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

"In the spirit of

"In the spirit of collaboration."

 

I find it also interesting that my responses on your site one of which I posted her, have not been allowed to be posted on the site, while the posts of some other members of the ayahuasca forum that support your position have been published.

To me this further supports my position that this post and your response to my site is politically motivated. 

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

-

Chen Cho Dorge: "only the people from the ayahuasca forum seem to see my work as wrong..... "

So, the central place on the internet to learn about Ayahuasca; a place filled with people who are very well versed in Ayahuasca; who have many years experience drinking Ayahuasca; researching Ayahuasca; it's use, traditions, history; along with engaging many other Amazonian Teacher Plants and medicines... seem to disagree with you and your approach?

That seems to be saying something.

As was recently posted on the Ayahuasca.com forums:

"I don't understand why the author does not believe that Changa or "Changaya" can stand on its own, without an attempt to redefine Ayahuasca."

 

 

I beleive that I posted the

I beleive that I posted the reason why I feel that is Morgan in my response to Dans article which he still will not allow to be posted on his site. 

The ayahuasca forum and I belive you as well have a political agenda in regards to ayahuascas legalization and legitimization, that seeks to create a divide between smoked or extracted DMT and ayahuasca.

 

Belive me when I say that I wish for ayahuasca to be legitimized and intigrated into western society but not at the expense of stigmitizing DMT extracted from natural plant sources. 

as far as changa standing on its own... well it doesnt stand on is own. It is the product of a syngery of two plants or chemicals combined together.

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com

Pole Position

I have no political agenda.

Of that you can be sure.

 

But I'll quote another line from the Ayahuasca board from someone who seems rather experienced with changa:

"So, on the one hand, I think it is "good" (to give) Changa its own room to become culturally accepted and understood - on the other hand, I do think that strongly associating Changa to Ayahuasca in order to cement its validity and value is unecessary."

 

I agree with that line and that's essentially where I'm coming from...

If that's political ... well, call me El Presidente

 

 

LOL! So El Presidente, is

LOL! So El Presidente, is that why you told me in an email that you thought that changa and smoked DMT put ayahuasca at a risk of staying illegal?Your bias against Changa is political just as it is with Dan.

 

 

http://changaya.blogspot.com

-

I have no bias against changa.

 

That should be clear by now.

 

What the issue is, is your insistance on conflating and confusing Ayahuasca with changa. And just adding more confusion into the mix. I think Dan, and others, have made this clear, and if that is not clear for you... well, I dunno.

 

 

It's not politics.

As I said in our email exchange; it's almost just a matter of grammar.

 

But more so, from my perspective, it's a matter of respect. Respect for both entities. It's as simple a matter as if someone came around saying San Pedro is the evolution of Ayahuasca, because look! we put Ayahuasca leaves in the San Pedro, and then smoked it!

Just doesn't make much sense.

You are very inclined to tout changa as the "evolution of ayahuasca" - yet you fail to evolve your own perspective. Even though in an above comment:

neoshaman stated: "Ayahuasca has not evolved into Changa. Changa evolved from Ayahuasca"

To which you then acknowledged with "I thank you infinitely for your correction..."

Yet, you fail to evolve your writing about the matter, and seem be resistant to grow, to let light, and constructive criticism, shine into your heart.

You need not take this as an attack, or personally, or as some kind of political maneuver.

 

 

***

 

 

I posted the following comment elsewhere, it might be a little out of context, but it is in response to all this pharmahuasca, globalhuasca, changaya, "changa has become ayahuasca" stuff.

-

 

The street finds its own use for things, sure. Like how the "street" saw fit to call indigenous peoples savages or primitives, or, twisting their names and languages to befit an English speaking toungue. For example the Mohawk people originally called themselves Kanien'kehá:ka - but Europeans came along and, unable to pronounce that name, came up with Mohowawogs, which is derogatory, and means something like "eaters of living things" or "cannibals".

Rather than learning the names of indigenous peoples and going deeper into their cultures, learning their ways, traditions and so forth - that good ol' "English appropriation trend" reared its head.

And so it does here, with all these plants. Plants that many have little understanding of.

I mean, Ayahuasca is a plant; it is a spirit; it is an entity. In terms of description, you might even say it is a "person".

Same goes for all the plants.

So, forgetting for a moment zeitgeists, memes, slang and word-of-the-day, and looking upon plants as people or "peoples", each with certain heritages, traditions and characteristics - when we start to get lazy and cover names in blanket terms, or mis-name or use shorthand to describe these plants and their gifts, it's a bit like making up names for other people.

As the term "savage" (which was totally part of the spirit of the zeitgeist) prevailed - many people, indeed the entire world, lost out, or began to loose touch with what indigenous people were capable of. And we now are trying to regain and re-learn some of this knowledge.

So, when we get lazy and call a tree, or a root, a vine. Or refer to changa as ayahuasca, or refer to, say, Teonanacatl as "zooms", then we begin to loose things, and we begin down that long road of trying to regain wisdom.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I really dont know what to

I really dont know what to tell you Morgan... lol I disagree with you and I actually know you are not being straight forward about your motives either. But you can publicly say whatever you wish about me or my work. I no longer feel like defending myself to you.

 Think whatever you like... I have no problem letting light into my heart brother... lol

 

 http://changaya.blogspot.com