Beaker Burgers

beakers.jpg

Scientists around the world are working to invent a viable way to engineer in-vitro meat – that is meat grown inside a test tube from animal muscles and tissues without using live animals in order to form a simplified version of meat. Besides being a healthier option for humans (due to the decreased amount of saturated fat), it also provides a more sustainable alternative for the environment by reducing carbon emissions produced annually from the meat industry. Another incentive to produce cultured meat is to reduce the spread of diseases such as swine flu, avian flu, mad cow disease, and contamination from Salmonella.  Not to mention the commercial and financial rewards possible if in-vitro meats become marketable, which may happen within the next 3-10 years.

As a show of support, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has offered a $1 million prize to the first team who can "produce an in-vitro chicken-meat product that has a taste and texture indistinguishable from real chicken flesh to non-meat-eaters and meat-eaters alike; and manufacture the approved product in large enough quantities to be sold commercially... at a competitive price," as noted to the article.

In another article published in H+, Hank Hyena outlines an optimistic and imaginative vision of ways in-vitro meat (IVM), also called tank steak, sci-fi sausage, petri pork, beaker bacon, or Frankenburger, may change the future. Stating that this could be as socially transformative as the invention of the airplane, he explores the end of ranches and the rise of urban cowboys, world economic upheaval, exotic and kinky meats such as snow leopard, as well as the abolition of guilt from eating meat-based products.

While not quite vegan-approved, Hyena states that IVM has the support of groups such as Animal Liberation, Vegetarian Federation of Germany (VEBU), Ethical Vegetarian Alternative of Belgium (EVA), and the Dutch Vegetarian Society. And of course, PETA, who has offered a financial reward to the first group who produces a competitive and marketable in-vitro meat product by 2012.


Image: "Manufacturing Meat" by Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing.

 

Comments

BARF

This is disgusting.

How is this solving any real problems? Can we just treat animals well, give them a good life, honour them, kill them humanely, and be nourished by them? Maybe if we didnt eat meat 3 times a day, and rather ate it maybe 3 times a week or once a day, we wouldnt need to "produce" so much meat. Instead of using technology to solve our problems can we please use love and common sense? I never in my life will eat a meat product grown in a testube, and I can not believe PETA is giving rewards for this! Actually i can because it seems to me that PETA is just another disinformation source to real issues and real solutions.

 

 

I hope that you can find your balance between the mystic and mundane,
I hope that you can navigate your way between the sacred and profane.

That sounds good to me

It would be nice to have peace and respect for the animals from a collective standpoint.

 

 

Like "Oryx and Crake"

I agree wholeheartedly with you, Sacred Fire. Test tube meat--ick. Canadian author Margaret Atwood wrote an entire novel on the subject of a dystopian future where the entire food supply is created in the lab/factories of giant bioengineering corporations. It is called "Oryx and Crake".

I do not see how creating test tube ChickyNuggtz is a viable solution to the food crises we face on this planet. More and more people are yearning for real, locally grown, healthy food free from bioengineering, chemical additives, hormones, and antibiotics. Eating less meat, buying locally, and creating and utilizing local, organic food co-ops is a much more viable alternative, I believe.

I am very disappointed that PETA is behind this initiative. I have supported PETAs aims, though not always their methods, and considering that they are willing to spend a million dollars of money donated by their members to further such an insane cause is cause enough for me to never donate to their organization.

My own feeling is that our over-reliance on science and technology in food production and distribution has contributed to our current food crisis (and growing health crises) , and the solution to the problem is to return to a more local, natural, and humane way of growing and producing food.

Have you hugged your enemy today?

ehh

I work at a TYSON beef plant as a security officer. I find the way we raise up animals for mass production is disgusting. They make them as fat as possible as fast as possible. They do this by giving them cooked ground up beef bones mixed with hay and molasses. The molasses makes them want to eat it non-stop. Every once and a whyle they get clogged because their intestines can't handle it. Then someone puts on a glove that reaches to their shoulder and they go digging. These cows live in fear. Every time I do a useless patrol I go out where the cows are. Everyday it's always all eyes on me immediately and they get up and go to the opposite side of the cage. I also send loaded trailers full of this cooked ground up bones and dried blood to chicken and turkey plants for animal feed. Test tube meat? Seems a lot cleaner to me... And just to give you a better idea of this place, there are 2 large sewage ponds out front just when you pull in and they smell like a combination of rotting death and raw sewage (I like to turn my car heater off as I drive my them). And the smell of rotting beef permeates over a 2 mile radius around this place. The first time I came out to this place I was gagging the smell was so bad. It's a job though...

Boycott PETA!!!

Test tube meat is a rather horrible idea, following in the footsteps of margarine,preservatives,food additives, and GMO's. But at least I could understand the motives of better living through Chemistry for profit. But PETA ENDORSING THIS?????!!! I say (excuse my french) FUCK PETA. They just tipped their hand and show that the policy makers don't really care about people. They don't believe humans are part of nature, otherwise why would they endorse and pay to help create a technology that could cause all type of possible mutations in humans? In their article they write that "Chickens are drugged to grow so large they often become crippled...". Yes that is horrible , but PETA shows no concern when they recommend the same idea for Humans. Come on PETA (and the other animal rights organizations who endorse this) get your head on straight! (BTW I'm a vegetarian)

The beginning of the end

I was quite disturbed when I read this article for several reasons. First of all, because such iniciative is supported by groups like PETA and VEBU and EVA. This groups to me seemed like conscious iniciatives and right now I realize they are just bought up from the system. The second reason is that humans, we are what we eat, there are endless studies proving the behaivor of humans fluctuates even our perception and mental abilities, depending on what it is that we eat. Therefore, what are we going to become when we eat an engeneered animal from a lab, which we no nothing at all about its energetic quality or place in nature. An animal that has been designed by our scientist, which their acknowledge of genetical engeneering is primitive still. I have studied macrobiotic medicine, currently I follow the macrobiotic guideliness of diet, I am not a vegeterian one , even though I was a vegan for more than four years. I eat fish, eggs and very seldomly good organic quality meat, so I have a perspective from both sides of the scale, the meat eaters and the vegans. I believe veganism is a great way to live, if it fits for the person's lifestyle, but I also believe it can be just as healthy and conscious to have animal product in one's diet as long as it is good quality. In order to be a vegan and be properly feed one must also have of course first quality product. And for the people that eat animal produce, the quality is also incredibly important to prevent deseases like cancer or arthritis. The point I am making is that we will no longer  know what real quality means when we eat something that has grown in lab. Why? Very simple, when we eat a chiken that has been raised in a farm and has eating its natural food from an energetic stand point we know what we are eating. We know the chicken energetic make up, and to some extent when we eat that animal we will inherit some of that energy in our system. That animal has a place on nature and it is part of its cycle. That´s why a good stew with some meat or chicken or fish in the winter warms us up, because animals produce energetically has that quality, and when we eat it we are part of the cycle in nature. However, when an animal is miss treated and poorly feed like today happens in our society more toxins are storaged and released into the flesh which we eat later when we cook it. This is the reason why colon cancer in the US is a major desease. Can anyone imagine what it would be like if we start eating animals that are ingeneered for the mere purpose of growing lean meat and having a better capitalistic economy? what kind of life will that animal have? what kind of genetic trade mark  we will be ingesting? what kind of society we will become since we are what we eat. All the empires in this world have been linked to a cereal, the roman empire was the weat, the Mayan's was the corn, the Chinese was the rice, The English was the weat, and oat meal. The society in which we live right now is the way it is because it has lost total contact with nature. Our genetically engeneered food that looks like the real vegetables that we used to be able to get every where before, is something derooted from nature just like the human race is. The way we torture animals is the way we torture each other in our XXI century so civilized society. The way we destroy the earth is the way in which we destroy ourselves through wars, and a desperate sense of having to beat everyone to get more. Even though we think we live in abundance we don't, we live in scarcity because real abundance is harmony with nature and well being of every one. We are not in harmony with nature and not everyone is well.

All this has come from the way we have statred to deal with food and nature,  the industrialization of food and the crisis or our era have lined up perfectly. To start eating engeneered animals, animals that are raised in a lab will make us into a lab society where we do what we are told, and where we no longer have no conection to the earth not through the food not through our daly lives in society. Because of the way food is grown today not even the normal farmers are connected to nature since they sit on a huge machine harvesting vast portions of land which have been treated chemically. Regular farmers don't even understand nature.

What kind of world are we going to create for our children if instead of looking into real sustainable solutions such organic farming, permaculture, biodynamic farming, we go and put our future in the hads of the same people that have created the crisis in which we live.

None of the solutions that I have given are never considered because they mean a decentralitation of power, they mean that the land will go into the hands of many and not few.  

 Raising meat in a lab can never be sustainable under any point of view, not from the energetic stand point or from the health one or as a food resourse. The truth is the way capitalistic society is structured gives the advantage to coorporations to take as much power away from our hands as possible, that's why F1 seeds exist which are only good for one generation, and why pesticides have come into place.And if this goes forward then our entire living existence will be on the hands of the big companies which on top of having the economical power they will decide what kind of energy and genetics we will be feed with. If this ever happen this will be the beginning of the end as we know our race today.

very well said

very well said. I agree wholeheartedly with your suggestion that the way we're acting ("rationally") is demonstrative of an incorrect and self-damaging view of our own collective humanity

It's just one solution among many

As a vegetarian for twenty years, I'd never eat this engineered meat. But I definitely see where PETA is coming from on this. It is a sad reality that agri-business rules, and that human beings, particularly Americans, consume an inordinate among of meat that animals have to suffer and die for in inumerable ways. Along with education about the way animals are treated (movies like Food, Inc.), the locavore movement, organic farming, and all the rest of the evolving food culture, bio-engineered food is just another step in the direction we need to go in -- no more killing animals for food. We need to eventually evolve beyond this disgusting, brutal business. But we're not going to get there overnight, and you better believe that most people aren't going to give up their Quarter Pounders and Mcnuggets for the sake of Betsy the Cow. That's up to people who love and have committed their lives to animal welfare. Fake meat may be unpalatable to those of us with taste for good food, but if it will save more animals from suffering, I am all for it. To get a sense of the way animals are currently treated on conventional farms, read some of the literature from farmsanctuary.org.

sounds like a precursor to

sounds like a precursor to soylent green yummmm who thought it'd be animal rights organizations welcoming it's arrival? are we humans not animals deserving of rights as well? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green

A weird, kinda scary, but legitimate PIECE of a solution

Firstly, I do agree with most of the points everyone here has said so far. Is this just the latest in a long line of experiments whereby humans are playing god? Yes. Do we know anything about the quality of this proposed beaker meat? No, not yet. Is this the way nature goes about supplying food for any of its plethora of creatures? No, not quite. Does America (and surely many other nations) rely too heavily on a meat-based diet that not only damages the environment but also ourselves, disrespecting and physically/emotionally damaging the animals we consume? Of course.

However, I firmly believe that the timescale we are presented with to correct our globally destructive habits is much too short to believe that enough people will see the error of their ways in time to adjust their lifestyles towards a sustainable, healthy, globally responsible way of living. Given that raising enough livestock to fuel our meatlust is a main component of deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, water contamination etc etc etc I think we can all agree that something needs to be done, and fast.

While the ultimate solution would be to educate and convince individuals to be aware of their choices and make responsible decisions instead of the most convenient ones, there simply are not enough people making enough of an impact to make me think that such a revolution will happen quickly enough. Just like how there is no singular alternative fuel that will suddenly alleviate the so called energy crisis or magically reverse the global warming trends we have set in motion, there is no one approach that will magically fix the food crisis, at least not in the easily foreseeable future.

PETA wants to see less animals living and dying in horrible conditions. I think, while it is slightly terrifying along the lines of Soylent Green or The Matrix baby-recycling, we should be glad that an alternative means of feeding the world is in the works. Not all locations of the world where there are people (most everywhere) are capable of sustaining enough vegetative or animal agriculture. By admitting that fact alone, or any of a million other examples, we see that humanity is already living outside of the natural cycle. I have not done the researched or crunched the numbers, but I dare say that there are already too many of us out there to suddenly and fluidly transition to sustainable, restorative practices without the intervention of several kinds of nature-defying technology.

While the goal should obviously be to eventually work with nature within her boundaries and laws, we have gone too far to think we can get back in harmony so easily. Nature's way of correcting our problems is through predation, disease and starvation as we have OBVIOUSLY outgrown the environments 'natural' carrying capacity for our species. Let us step away from our computers, clear indicators that we are not the ones suffering as drastically from the errors of humanity (the West, Industry, capitalism, whatever you want to blame) and try and imagine how excited someone who lives off a completely inadequate diet would be if they were offered cheap, safe, nutritious lab grown meat.

Thats all im sayin.

something to ponder+

I think everyone on this forum is conscious of energy and how it affects us...so... think of the energy you are ingesting into your own body when you eat the flesh of an animal that has been tortured and has suffered ....this energy becomes a part of your own psyche....not pleasant to think about.... Plants do not have the complex nervous systems that animals have.....there really is SO much more to eat...than animals.

(you really are what you eat)

 Becoming a vegetarian (vegan) is an important step into higher consciousness.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 

No amount of rationalization or blaming can preempt the moment of choice each of us brings to our situation here on this planet. The lesson of the 60's is that people who cared enough to do right could change the world. 

We didn't end racism but we ended legal segregation.

We ended the idea that you could send half-a-million soldiers around the world to fight a war that people do not support.

We ended the idea that women are second-class citizens.

We made the environment an issue that couldn't be avoided.

The big battles that we won cannot be reversed.

 We were young...... self-righteous.... reckless... hypocritical... brave...silly.... headstrong and scared half to death.

And we were right.

Abbie Hoffman 

 

 

 

   

 

you can lead a human to crucial knowledge...

... but you can't make them not ignore it and do something bizarre and misguided instead, like grow "meat" in a test-tube.  For those who want to support the sane and intelligent solution:

http://sites.google.com/a/veganmail.com/veganicrevolution/

&

http://www.evolver.net/user/satyagrahi/blog/refining_path_freedom_vegani...

Thankyou for the vegan comment

Thanks for that vegan input. It's so crucial that the myths about being vegan (i.e. that we are pasty and fussy with extreem diets) are dispelled. My overall health and general mental, emotional, physical stability has been so improved since cutting out animal biproducts. Plus it's dead cheap and easy when you do it right. Same goes for stockfree growing.

http://www.veganorganic.net/

http://theppk.com/

 

Looking beyond the quick solution

I agree with the point of view that has been maid by most of you about having to step out from the insane slaughter of animals. I realize there is an animal genozide taking place every day, at this very moment,  and it is such a catastrophe that if we dared to open our hearts fully to the thousands of screams we would not be able to bare it. However, being in the delicate position that humanity it is right now we can't settle for the less of the two evils or jump into the first option that is handed to us, "specially when that choice deviates from nature so far."

 

Decades ago the farmers in Europe, "I'm speaking about Europe because is where I am from and what I know for a fact" were told that they should start using less compost and manure and they should begin employing the chemical fertilizers. This was promoted in order to increase production and meet the demand of the competitive global economy of our times. In the beginning it seemed to work, there was about 20% more production at the expense of that magical treatment. Today the south of Spain, the region that produced during hundreds of years frist quality vegetables up to 30 years ago, and had enjoyed a great wealth from the land as well as a rich biodiversity is devastated. Due to the employment of fertilizers and pestizides, which ended up substituting completely manure and compost, the levels of nitrification in the underground water reserves are so high that are poisoned for human and animal comsumption. This is just one example of how deviating from nature and the acknowledge roots from our fathers leads us to.

You have to imagine the area of Flint Michigan US, but in Valencia Spain in order to understand how thousands of farmers have lost their jobs, and on top of that the land has been ravaged. This has taken place from the hand of our institutions that promoted a "more advanced way of living and dealing with the land" when in reality they were making business at the expense of nature. Do you think the goverment of the United States or any corporation is coming to the solution of engineering meat from a stand point of stopping animal slaughter? ..... my guess is no. They promote this because it means business to the corporations, of course at the expense of anything like always. We must realize that even though our society, Western society, is addicted to eating way too much meat, the solution does not rely in creating an animal that we feel consciously okay to kill, or an lab enegineered steack. Because we don't know the after math of what that experiment and all of its outcomes might be and what is the real price we will pay for that product, health wise, energetically wise, and its effect on the planet. 

Humanity, society, WE can't settle anymore for the quick solution, we have to learn how to say NO, and demand our rights. We have the right to demand the stop cruel animal slaughter, and to demand a campain that informs the masses of what it does in every sigle level. We have the right to sensivitize society about our conection to nature and how we are living and how those animals are living.  We have the right to live in a planet that is humane, in a society that is in harmony with nature, and we have the right to an existence where real values and life is put before money. Things are so far fucked up that we are loosing our capacity for hope and fight, but that is exactly what we can´t do. 

When we think about profits it should be the wellfare of every sigle being, no the economic growth at the expense of life.

Therefore, we can't settle for a lab engeneered animal which is trying to be a quick solution when in reality is more business for the same hands that are slaughtering the animals now. We can´t settle for that waiting to step out of the patterns we have, such as eating insane amounts of meat,  by creating far worst alternative. I personaly belive that as a race we are in a critical point and we cannot afford plan B solutions. We must demand what's right and think of what has happened when we've tried to play God, and think what can happen if we go farther with it.

 

We can't go for the quick solution because that will lead us into a far worst future.  We have to hope and fight for the turth. 

"Humanity, society, WE can't

"Humanity, society, WE can't settle anymore for the quick solution, we have to learn how to say NO, and demand our rights. We have the right to demand the stop cruel animal slaughter, and to demand a campain that informs the masses of what it does in every sigle level. We have the right to sensivitize society about our conection to nature and how we are living and how those animals are living.  We have the right to live in a planet that is humane, in a society that is in harmony with nature, and we have the right to an existence where real values and life is put before money. Things are so far fucked up that we are loosing our capacity for hope and fight, but that is exactly what we can´t do."

SO SO TRUE!! 

 

 

I hope that you can find your balance between the mystic and mundane,
I hope that you can navigate your way between the sacred and profane.

Cruelty

Human beings are omnivores. I don't see a problem with people eating animals; but I do see a big problem with the institutionalized cruelty to animals. Some day, that may be seen with the same horror that we feel when we hear about human tragedies like the holocaust. I don't see anything wrong with test-tube meat. It feels strange and Onyx-and-Crake-ish but still I can't come up with a reason not go there. http://www.beyond-karma.com

debunking false belief

"Human Beings are omnivores".

Why do you think that's true? Because so many humans eat meat, I'm sure. The problem with that simplistic view is that it doesn't actually fit the science of our physiology. The #1 cause of death in America, Heart Disease, is predominantly the effect of animal product consumption. Does that sound natural to you? If you actually look into the science of the nutrition, you will see that the idea that humans need meat for optimum health is a complete lie, and actually the opposite is true. Ingestion of animal products is the direct cause of many critical heath ailments for humans. The ignorance of this, or deception if you like, has plagued humanity for centuries, though has been spoken against for centuries as well. Luckily many more people are waking up to the truth in the 21st century and are actually engaging in critical thinking rather than just saying "humans are omnivores" because that may be the status-quo in their current environment. Speciesism is an ignorant perspective based on a false self of superiority, just like racism and sexism.

Ultimately though if you don't care, about the animals, yourself or the environment, you're probably not going to look into this, you're just going to take the conditioned and easy (apparently) way and accept the status-quo without any actual objective inquiry... The motto of Reality Sandwich is very appropriate here: "Evolving Consciousness. Bite by bite." If you can actually open your mind to some crucial (r)evolutionary truth, again I implore you to actually look into the resources listed here:  http://sites.google.com/a/veganmail.com/veganicrevolution/

Other comments here fall into the common moral relativism perspective, aligning with the idea that this is all much more "complicated" than I'm presenting it here. That view is actually just deluded intellectualism, because the facts are very plain to see, if you actually look at them. But again if you cared you wouldn't need mountains of scientific research, you would evolve because of your compassion, which is one and the same with the evolutionary impulse, or Authentic Self. If such "spiritual" talk doesn't make sense to you, then never mind it & just do yourself, animals and the Earth a favor and do the research.

Peace

not a bad idea.....

this meat in test tube thing might not be such a bad idea...... I mean slaughter houses don't treat animals in a humane way, they are dirty, they release toxics into the air we breathe and so much more stuff....So why not give this try.... I mean if this does not work we can always go back to real meat, and just try treating the animals better!

Test tube meat...

Doesn't sound that appetizing to me but re-reading Danes post describing daily life working in a meat plant makes it seems positively like a gourmet meal! With the amount of meat needed to be produced worldwide cheaply to feed the demand, there will never be a way to make the conversion of an animal to food humane. Go veg!

EVERTHING IS AS IT SHOULD BE

Im sorry to be so forward here & please forgive the caps BUT.... All I mostly hear on this post is complaining and judgement and putting down meat eaters & O yeah the outrageous comment that being vegetarian and vegan is necessary for higher consciousness (listen to how egotistical that sounds) Personally I have made a commitment to only eat local happy meat be it cow or chicken or pig. HOWEVER! Everything is energy yes and by the way we are all GODS. EVERYTHING comes from GOD (the vacuum of space) Even plants display energy waves of fear and stress when even just threatened with a thought, so how about all of those fruits and vegies we go plucking right off of the vine with no regard to how the plant is feeling taking something that it has put love and energy into from it. I know this sounds bizar but my point is that it is all in the intention of the individual. This world is changing rapidly as we travel through space to the galactic center of our galaxy. Along with consciousness rising there is also going to be so much technology around us doing things to prove theories and create a different life completely, things which most will say "They think they are playing GOD" Well let me remind you again divine people we are all GOD. We must learn to tolerate and NOT JUDGE what happens around us. So to all of my sentient brothers and sisters that have an opinion on this site... I agree with you all and yet I disagree to some level as well. I believe we should all chose to do what resonates with us on a personal level and that it is all going to be right. THE POOL OF POSSIBILITIES ARE ENDLESS! En Lakech "We are the Divine Light that shines infinitely." Brandy Sarasvati