Astral Organics: A Cow Jumped Over the Moon
A decade or so ago, I was spending a lot of time at a Northern California Zen Center that also trained organic farmers. One day I was talking to this one fellow about the difference between organic and Biodynamic farming, and he explained that, in addition to various techniques of crop rotation and pest control, Biodynamic farmers track the positions of the moon and other planets so as to time their planting and harvesting according to astrological conditions. Woah. Even more surprising was the fellow's somewhat sheepish admission that Biodynamic growers use the horns of a bull slaughtered at the fall equinox to prepare various dilute concoctions that are shared among different farms, which use the almost homeopathic preparations to aid composting and improve the quality of the soil. He added that usually the mightiest bulls were chosen, because they had the most power.
As a lover of occulture, I thought all this was just plumb-dandy. If I hadn't been at the Zen Center, I would have scampered out to buy some Biodynamic chardonnay then and there. As a sometimes journalist, I also immediately saw the possibility of an alternative weekly scoop: Occult Forces Grew Your Parsnips. Even Whole Food types would have their minds blown.
But the more I talked with the fellow about the Biodynamic community, the more I realized that it would be very difficult to tell the story the way I would want to. Having written lots of journalism about spiritual subcultures, I was familiar with the editorial pressures, subtle on overt, to mock peculiar practices or to castigate believers for unscientific beliefs. I worked hard to create balanced portrayals that would neither whitewash the weirdness or mock from on high, and felt I could do the story justice. While squeezing some fun out of the peculiarity of these practices, I believed I could write something anthropologically sensitive, a piece that would celebrate the spiritual imagination and the sacred dimension that organic agriculture has for many of its practitioners.
On further reflection, however, I realized that even if I could write the piece the way I wanted to, the information itself would probably not make the lives of Biodynamic producers any easier. Even though astrology remains pervasive in popular culture and individual lives, revelations about moon forces and cow magic would fall on too many ears closed to the spirit. In the words of my old pal Dan Levy, it would not be "good for the Jews." So I preferred to just be in on the secret, and to let the esoteric remain where it feels most at home: in the shadows.
So imagine my peculiar emotions when, ten years later, I encountered the cover story of this week's SF Weekly. "Voodoo on the Vine" went the coverline, emblazoned in a ye olde font over a bunch of grapes and a pair of horns poked with needles. "Biondyamics -- The Next Big Thing in Green Winemaking -- is Fermented with Dead Animals and the Occult." Here, ten years of Biodynamic growth done the line, was the story I wanted to research, but definitely not the story I wanted to write.
The journalist, a humorless and pedestrian thinker named Joe Eskenazi, did about as much of the surface homework as you can expect from an alt-weekly stringer, but the tone and argument of the piece was the same old non-alternative story: a snide, accusatory, one-dimensional "expose" of the occult dimension of Biodynamic Farming and its founder, Rudolph Steiner, a brilliant Austrian philosopher-mystic possessed of many an unfamiliar notion. (The fact that Steiner influenced scores of top name modernists and also pulled the highly-regarded Waldorf educational method out of the ether was not deemed worthy of mention.) Playing the "I am a lapdog of science" routine, Eskenazi exposes Steiner and his methods to be non-magical bullshit. Eskenazi then performs some of that public service for which alt-journalism is renowned by questioning the higher prices that Biodynamic wines fetch in relation to their merely organic cousins.
It's still an interesting story. I enjoyed hearing retailers and owners of tony wine bars splutter when asked about the spooky stuff, and I was happy to see a number of producers stand up and explain why they embrace Biodynamic principles. That said, Steiner was definitely a deeply wacky guy whose Biodynamic claims do not hold much water from the perspective of astronomy or the science of cow decomposition. Eskenazi is right to poke fun of the language of a lot of Biondyamic promotional literature, as the producers attempt to muddle around the fact that their methods are animated by an esoteric current that has no official sanction in the modern world.
What blows me away though is how badly journalists write about spirituality and spiritual worldviews. "Voodoo"? Come on guys, even Hollywood knows that means an African legacy, not a Paracelsian one like this. And don't talk to me about science: talk to me about culture and history and the imagination, and how these things shape our relationship to the earth, especially at a time when that relationship is under such heavy and much needed reconfiguring. I mean really, folks, what is more interesting? High school physics reminders about the miniscule tidal forces emanating from the moon? Or the fact that our society's stumbling, and somewhat last-ditch embrace of organic food production is enlivened in some parts with a mystically organic worldview as well?
This organic world-view is not science, but it is a poem of science, one that resonates with ancient and hidden networks of sympathy that link our ordinary world with cosmic forces. Those links may be fictions, but fictions are alive, and mark the world in myriad ways, especially when they are as ancient as these. Within this literally esoteric network, meanings proliferate, reflect, and alchemically combine. As above, so below. From that perspective, it is hardly accidental that Eskenazi's revelation about Biodynamic occultism is not about rutabagas but wine: a soul-enriching Dionysian delight that remains one of the most refined and spiritually symbolic agricultural products in the history of the planet. Good wine is a poem of the earth, or of humanity's devotion to earth. Of course such a poem remains infused by gods.
Photo by Jaydot, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
- 12-19-08
- Erik Davis's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Bioawesome perspective on an often-maligned topic
_________
This is a wonderful piece, thanks for the openness to biodynamics. It is a rare sentiment, actually, even among the otherwise evolved organic farmers I know. Cheers! -M- mohseyep.wordpress.com
mohseyep.wordpress.com
Much Thanks!
naturally occuring sufites
naturally occuring sufites compared with added sulfites:
http://www.freywine.com/freywine/no-sulfites-added.html
poetry
Only trust writing that knows it is poetry.
Only trust as far as the poetry goes.
Thankyou for the delightful meander around the biodynamic grove.
The way in which you went about this is interesting. Like going for a walk.
I do believe both fact and fiction are living breathing growing occurances.... to be referred to but not pinned down.
in-formation
If anyone's actually interested in voodoo, Wade Davis's book (not the movie) 'The Serpent and the Rainbow' is his personal account of 'voodoo' in haiti, its curtural-political interplay, and how belief systems play into our subjective realities. 'One River' (Davis, also) is phenomenal, too.
As for biodynamics, 'Secrets Of the Soil', by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird (who also wrote 'The Secret Life of Plants') is a bible. Compost recipes in the back, amazing stories, and scientific research and discoveries. If our grandparents had these books as curriculum in school, we'd be living in a garden.
Also, arborsmith.com and terreform.net are worth checking out if you like plants.... and life. Get back to nature.
Wait a minute!! It actually
The Problem of Explanation
Erik,
I'm a big fan of your work, but quite put off by what should be an obvious contradiction here.
You rightly criticize Eskenazi for dismissing Steiner and biodynamics in the name of scientism and a rather superficial bit of political economy.
But then you go on to write,
"That said, Steiner was definitely a deeply wacky guy whose Biodynamic claims do not hold much water from the perspective of astronomy or the science of cow decomposition. Eskenazi is right to poke fun of the language of a lot of Biondyamic promotional literature, as the producers attempt to muddle around the fact that their methods are animated by an esoteric current that has no official sanction in the modern world."
Perhaps your criticism is aimed specifically at biodynamic books or statements that "muddle around" the spiritual - but anthroposophy is an often hard-won world-view. To explain one aspect of it requires explaining so many others. If you expect biodynamic farmers to supply explanations of the astral, etheric, mineral and ego bodies; or the relation of the planets to the organs of the human being; the extended souls of animals; the reflected lattice work of plants in the cosmos, you may be expecting too much -particularly if you go to no lengths to explain these in your own article. If this is your complaint, offer us suggestions for a concise version of the complexities of this spiritual knowledge.
Also, I wonder - is that really the best you can do to inform readers about Steiner? You praise Waldorf education and Steiner's influence on modern thinkers, but the mystical worldview behind all anthroposophical endeavors gets the same "wacky" treatment from you that you take Eskenazi to task for.
While you're noting that Eskenazi left out Waldorf eductaion, don't yourself forget the profound and very public contributions anthroposophy has made to medicine, meditation, architecture, finance, poetry, painting, and lesser-known contributions to jewelry-making, stained glass-making, and bee keeping.
Without its "wacky" spiritual aspects, anthroposphy makes no sense. Indeed, it is unintelligable. It is only the mystical worldview and the spiritual component of anthroposophy that bear it practical fruits. If you want to criticize a rich and complex spiritual movement and its founder, don't follow Eskenazi's path of undereducated, unexplained dismissal.
Love and peace,
C
How much do we know?
The violets in the mountains have broken the rocks.
It is not only astrological
Grapes/Biodynamics