Support our Kickstarter

Artificial Evolution

RS Repliee mackz lg.jpg

Robotics pioneer Hans Moravec has made some bold statements and predictions about the current state and future of artificial intelligence.

“I see a strong parallel between the evolution of robot intelligence and the biological intelligence that preceded it," he says. "The largest nervous systems doubled in size about every fifteen million years since the Cambrian explosion 550 million years ago. Robot controllers double in complexity (processing power) every year or two. They are now barely at the lower range of vertebrate complexity, but should catch up with us within a half century."

Moravec goes on to predict what will happen by the following dates: 

2010: A first generation of broadly-capable "universal robots" will emerge. The “servant” robots, will be able to run application programs for many simple chores. These machines will have mental power and inflexible behavior analogous to small reptiles.

2015: Utility robots host programs for several tasks. Larger "Utility Robots" with manipulator arms able to run several different programs to perform different tasks may follow single-purpose home robots. Their tens of billion calculation per second computers would support narrow inflexible competences, perhaps comparable to the skills of an amphibian, like a frog.

2020: Universal robots host programs for most simple chores. Larger machines with manipulator arms and the ability to perform several different tasks may follow, culminating eventually in human-scale "universal" robots that can run application programs for most simple chores. Their tens of billion calculation per second lizard-scale minds would execute application programs with reptilian inflexibility.

2030: Robot competence will become comparable to larger mammals. In the decades following the first universal robots, a second generation with mammallike brainpower and cognitive ability will emerge. They will have a conditioned learning mechanism, and steer among alternative paths in their application programs on the basis of past experience, gradually adapting to their special circumstances. A third generation will think like small primates and maintain physical, cultural and psychological models of their world to mentally rehearse and optimize tasks before physically performing them. A fourth, humanlike, generation will abstract and reason from the world model.

 

Creative Commons Image of the Repliee android by mackz on Flickr.

Comments

"ugly bags of mostly water"

I think I belong to the group that believes humans will evolve into “robots”, but sadly not necessarily advanced robots. We'll probably be able to do some cool stuff, like blink at a chip in our arms and use thoughts to manipulate mechanical things...

Moravec's predictions make it seem like technology is only good for making bots that do chores and tasks to make us even lazier. What about authentic meaningful technology?

When I look up emerging technologies, I get a little worried. Yes, there are some amazing medical technologies, and new/revised ideas that will aid in solving and dealing with environmental issues, but for the most part all I read about is things like bigger bandwidth to personalize services, dvds to hold hundreds of movies, advanced adverstising, etc. I feel like something is missing, but I'm not sure what.

I guess I want technology that makes things clearer, answers questions, truly revolutionizes public education, makes me smarter and better while keeping me compassionate. I want technology that teaches me to go a little slower instead of click click click fast fast fast, help I can't breathe. I want an android friend who teaches me things, like how to get along with others and how to recall everything I've ever learned. I want technology that lets more people work short days at home (Is it really necessary to commute to an office building only to email all day?), so we can actually socialize in person instead of on MySpace. Isn't it funny how we have all these friends/networks in cyberspace, but we rarely physically get together to seriously collaborate on art, music, words, life or even play a simple boardgame? And when we do get together with the best intentions to change the world, it seems to turn into one big competition rather than a good old fashion meeting of the minds. Maybe it's just me.