And Now, Faster-Than-Light Culture

The following originally appeared on Acceler8or.com
The recent discovery at CERN of neutrinos traveling faster than light – poetically announced on the autumnal equinox, when Venus goes direct in Scorpio as the evening star and Persephone emerges from the Underworld in our mythic imagination – has physics forums buzzing about the possibility that this is “solid” evidence of long-hypothesized additional dimensions.
This is big news. For the first time in the modern world, the existence of invisible spatial dimensions is in the public discourse. Science is the closest thing much of the literate planet has to religion these days, and this is far closer to the otherworldly transcendent mythos of early cities than the heady, highly existential relativity physics delivered to us from on high
by Einstein.
Truly mystic physics is making a comeback in the inevitable revelation that quantum “entanglement” only appears “spooky” when we think of each object-process as a distinct individual, rather than a nexus of pattern-vectors in space-time intersecting with every other in an endless fractal gem of co-causative influences. The increasing number of DMT-initiated mathematicians and psychologists speak like gnostic sages about hyper-dimensional organisms that appear discontinuous to three-dimensional vision…while so-called “visionary” physicists and cosmologists argue that hyper-dimensional elements may constitute “dark matter” (the exact kind our best smashers, like the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, are not going to detect).
We call certain unusually “far-seeing” people visionaries, but the word reveals more about our own media-conditioned preference for visual stimulus, still on its way out in an age when video content is a miracle reminder that we evolved for oral traditions, than it does about those minds able to articulate these dimensions – not higher, but along an other axis entirely – in a way more familiar to us. CERN won’t find these invisible landscapes for the same reason that shooting a laser pointer through smoke reveals only shifting line segments, not the full arabesques of drifting incense.
At any rate – sub- or super-luminal – Einstein is never going to be proven “wrong.” Relativity theory is ultimately a statement on what we can and cannot perceive as embodied animals – a sibling to Cubism and Literary Deconstruction, not an attempt to build from its own realization of plurality into a model of resonant synchrony. His work will not be replaced but engulfed, just as once free-swimming bacteria now live on symbiotically as mitochondria in our nucleated cells; just as agriculture was packed away into the belly of industrial society; just as we still have a place for the flying rocks of Newtonian dynamics within the greater explanatory atmosphere of plasma cosmology.
Relativity, though, is the study of relationships between things, not the omnidirectional unified theory for which it left us groping – much in the same way that the fad of deconstruction bottomed out and eventually even hard-line postmodernists like Foucault went looking for something sincere to believe in.
We as living creatures have sensory systems that evolved to notice differences. We will continue to see two things, and call them two things, for the purpose of making our way in the world. But this is not the perspective that will unify physics; Einstein himself said that “the significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.” In order to see the dynamic super-fractal that heals our “optical illusion of consciousness,” we need to take a step sideways from Einstein’s laser-like insights, out of the planar view of the discrete individual, and witness an endless pattern of inter-flowing in which everything contributes as both cause and effect to everything else – more a living creature than the static “hologram” of David Bohm‘s own unification attempts.
The next step in physics is to contemplate the full implications of a fractal paradigm, to recognize the Copernican likelihood that we are not the highest order of conscious complexity but are quite probably living as cells inside the body-mind of Something Greater, and that it too lives in Something Even Greater…no “First Cause” or “Omega Point,” except as perspectival artifacts like the horizon. Just as ants appear to us as living in three spatial dimensions but cognitive experiments reveal that they only experience width and length, we too are almost certainly unaware of our own relative ability to climb “over the rock,” as it were, and not just walk around it. Faster-than-light neutrinos aren’t moving faster than light. Just like “quantum tunneling” electrons, they’re impishly pointing the way through a door into another dimension, beckoning us through.
And we seem to be on the verge of confronting this new reality, this encounter with the transcendent unknown, on a mass cultural level. As increasing numbers of us spend all day immersed in the ethers of cyberspace – as shared experience becomes more spontaneous, immediate, and rich, and the boundaries of discrete selfhood are called into question – it gets easier to see how cultural historians like William Irwin Thompson argue that the spirit world is again an inescapable aspect of modern experience.
This discovery at CERN is a perfect expression of the zeitgeist. Instant messaging seems more and more like telepathy with training wheels. Reincarnation is rewritten as the nonlinear resonance of DNA crystals in one body with anothers, no more “entangled” with one another than two harmonics on the same carrier wave. The mythology of television is recast as a story of spiritual possession, finding obvious parallels with both Plato’s allegory of the cave and our swiftly-approaching ability – courtesy of population biology and cognitive neurophysiology – to watch collective brain scans in real-time as memes mutate and reproduce across an entire population.
It’s the historical channel down which we started rafting as soon as we saw the first photographs of Earth from orbit. Now we’re in the class-five rapids when that sense of planetary solidarity hits us just in time for us to synchronize our paddling, before we fly over the event horizon of that waterfall just ahead – this thing we’ve alternately called “Singularity” or “Apocalypse,” the moment at which we all acknowledge a new level of selfhood and a new level of collective, unified by our common experience of the tremendous mystery in which we’re all participating.
It’s not the End of the World; it’s the end of the End of the World. Electronic communication and “light-speed culture” is about to be upgraded. Get ready for time-space, teleportation, instantaneity, immanent infinite, galactic super organisms, and a newly-humble immersion in wonder as the human species takes our tottering first steps into faster-than-light culture.
–
Paleontologist turned performing philosopher, Michael Garfield‘s multimedia maps of the evolutionary landscape and our place in it are an attempt to demonstrate that everything is equally art, science, and spiritual practice.
- 11-28-11
- Michael Garfield's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Telepathy in the fractal paradigm
If two people engage in an instant messaging chat both using a brain-computer interface (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain%E2%80%93computer_interface) would this essentially fulfill the definition of telepathy? =)
I think the "fractal paradigm" is indeed the future of physics and math. Some people like Isaac Asimov understood this early on. Of course, they will only discover what mystics have known for a very long time, that the inside and the outside are reflections of each other.
"Telepathy" vs. Telepathy
Two ways to answer this question.
1) Charles Stross's answer to the issue of whether a computer that can reproduce the (KNOWN) functions of a human mind is, "Does a submarine swim?" In some sense, yes, this is telepathy, in the same way that the internet is astral projection;
2) In EXACTLY the same way that the internet is NOT astral projection, computer-mediated "telepathy" is a highly suspect mediated replacement/outsourcing of an innate organic function of the human bodymind. William Irwin Thompson follows Rudolf Steiner on this one, suggesting that we're all polluting our etheric bodies by spending so much time in the incoherent electromagnetic radiation of these devices...making us even more dependent on them because we have forgotten we can walk without the cane.
I know you're half joking, thank God. No, I don't think the cloud is an acceptable substitute for empathy.
Michael Garfield..:: Art - Music - Writing ::..
"Imagination is our greatest natural resource."
this article is
Absolutely not!
What gave you that idea? I'm about as staunch a critic of the Nerd Rapture as you'll ever find...in fact, I've spent the last few days filming rebuttals to Kurzweil and company's total ignorance of ecodelic epistemology and should have those posted here soon.
Michael Garfield..:: Art - Music - Writing ::..
"Imagination is our greatest natural resource."
Trans-humanist?
I see where one might call this trans-humanist propoganda. It was my first thought. What is the distinction between Singularity and Apocalypse as you understand the terms and the radical rupture you present - which seems to amount to a semantic, epistemological fracture rather than extension or amplification. How do we distinguish visionaries from navel-gazers, and do not those who desire to extend the penetrations of their gaze in such a manner merely reproduce the logics of industrial/late capitalism, which is quick to recuperate these visionaries into its grid of control?
transhumanism in two movements
Manannan, I'm happy to call this transhumanist, but let's distinguish recognizing the transitional nature of our species from assuming we are going to all upload our egos into computers and liberate ourselves from the nuisance of having a body...right?
The fundamental difference between delusional escapism and radical embrace of the "broken" world is recognition that whatever our opinion of nature it's bigger and smarter than we are, and we are embedded in it like cells in the human body.
There's a natural intelligence utterly beyond our ability to control with the Enlightenment program of Modernity, and while I do see the coevolution of humans and machines continuing to deepen and elaborate, I think the strongly convergent forces of the evolutionary process are going to bring carbon and silicon together in loving harmony as part of a cosmically alive and loving biosphere, rather than merely extending and continuing the madness of believing technological domination of nature and mastery of the material world is even possible.
guardian.uk.com
the true revolutionary image of 2011
Yeah, certainly not Occupy Wall St (just kidding!)
indeed
I totally agree, zezt, that pre-modern consciousness lived steeped in this stuff. But maybe you've noticed that the greatest social trend right now is from the country to the city - propelled by evolutionary incentives that are difficult to deny (eg, more choices).
It's extremely important that citydwelling modern humans be divested of our hubristic cosmology in which we are the leading edge of evolution and restored to a humble appreciation and participation in the greater manifold reality, and I see this discovery as a step in that right direction.
Your comment reminds me of Buddha's wife, asking him if he really NEEDED to leave her and his child in order to find his enlightenment. He knew that of course the answer was no, because Nirvana is not somewhere over there to go find; but also yes, because he needed to remove himself from his original life context in order to have the growth experiences necessary to recognize that.
Michael Garfield..:: Art - Music - Writing ::..
"Imagination is our greatest natural resource."
mythology
Living in a world that is perhaps better understood with an archetypal paradigm than a rational-empirical one, I brought up that story because what we are currently living through can be understood as a similar dialectic journey, recapitulating human psychological development...perhaps this one works better for you:
1) Kids start out fused with their mothers, afraid that if mother is out of sight they will die - this is literally experienced, if you remember your own infancy, as the fear of death when mom is not in sight;
2) Kids learn they're autonomous and capable of saying NO, and cycle through running away and running back to as they establish a sense of discrete selfhood;
3) Adults recognize themselves as self-possessing "individuals" but also honor and acknowledge their parents, seeing the other in the self, aware of the interconnectedness that bonds them, able to take the perspective required to see the massive selfless investment their own childrearing was for mom and dad.
"Either/Or" thinking doesn't do the nuances of this kind of fundamental synthesis justice. Yes, the child is selfish at first...and in some sense, even childrearing is selfish - motivated by a much WIDER sense of self than before. What started as a personal desire became (relative to that original perspective) transpersonal.
"Going back to nature" is a dangerous delusion based on the false premise that we ever left. The question, now that we have enough distance from the situation to recognize ourselves as distinct from (but still completely embedded in and animated by) nature is: how do we participate with the currents of evolutionary inevitability in the most responsible fashion? How do we honor the intelligence of the whole (the intelligence that, by reducing everything to unexamined oppositional dyads, we can never understand)?
thoroughly enjoyed
evolution / involution
Certain things are more obvious to children and the elderly - less attached, as they are, to the ways of this world. The difference, though, is in the complexity of the self interpreting this information. I feel like kids get it but don't know what to do with it. There isn't one kind of knowing. Intuitive hunches that start in the gut have to be translated into the reasoning of the brain to find any practical application...whole body gnosis, to truly "grok" an idea. People say they get fractals and then go on living as if humankind is at the top of a pyramid...
Thanks for your kind words. :)
Persephone emerges from the Underworld
metaphors posing as literal realities
Thanks for noticing my attempt to embed this whole conversation in the archetypal worldview! Yes, Cosmos & Psyche...this is a perfect time for paradigm-busting scientific revelations to surface.
I have nothing against science, let me make that clear. Literalizing experience has its place, just like you don't really need quantum mechanics to find the trajectory of a thrown baseball. Every stage of psychological development has its own "sacred text" and "doctrine," and right now the current paradigm in science is so far afield from its own dogma it's hilarious. (The mathematical underpinnings of the logic behind the scientific method are not only embodied and thus an organic evolutionary adaptation; they're also rife with untestable axioms. You can't simultaneously deny the multiverse as not accessible to rational inquiry through the senses and then advance string theory...)
It took empiricism to bring me to archetypal thinking. One leads directly to the other if you stick with it, because the latter is really just a sophisticated instance of the former. So I've got nothing against empiricism.
I'm happy to let people have their transcendence anywhere they can find it, as long as it's not mistakenly projected into the past, future, or other people. ;)
It took empiricism to bring me to archetypal thinking
Robotech
links...
protoculture
flower of life