Alcohol Poisoning

drink.jpg

A new ranking system based on a multicriteria analysis reveals alcohol to be the most harmful drug, beyond even heroin and crack.

The system developed by Professor Nutt of Imperial College London uses the multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to look at nine criteria that reflects harm caused to the user, which includes mortality, mental impairment, and dependency, as well as seven criteria that reflects damage done to others such as crime, environmental damage, economic cost, and family conflict, clustering them into five subgroups that represent physical, psychological, and social harms. 

The scaling was bast out of 100, 100 being the most harmful substance, and 0 being most harmless. The author of the model explained that great care was given "to ensure that each successive point on the scale represents equal increments of harm." So if a drug scored at 50, it would then be half as harmful as a drug that scored at 100.

The MCDA model placed alcohol at 72, making it the most harmful substance from a full range of analyzed categories, with the next highest drug being heroin which scaled at 55 points. Alcohol was placed over three times as harmful as cocaine and tobacco, and those placed even lower were cannabis (20), ecstacy (9), LSD (7), and mushrooms at (5) proving the lowest of all the classified drugs.

According to Nutt, a new classification system may group drugs into a new grading scale and the new findings lend support to previous work in the UK and Netherlands that confirms that the present drug classification system "have little relation to the evidence of harm." The importance of this new ranking system will hopefully be utilized in the reformation of the drug policy, grouping drugs together in terms of their actual harm and not through lobbyist campaigns, which will help cast a clearer perception on the reality of the substances considered socially acceptable and those tightly controlled in a grip of unscientific fear.

 

Image by erix! on Flickr courtesy of Creative Commons Licensing.

 

Comments

Uncontrolled Substance

Uncontrolled Substance

 

Cold turkey working … ‘on the “mojo” that’s smirking

in spite of it’s path … and the negotiable wrath

A pause in the plight … to promise what might

‘a beacon ... the praise ... ‘in and out of all phase

 

From convention … ‘shrink ... streets all ‘but mellow

‘in spite of the fever ... the sawing through jello

Just to posture the point …of trials and score

appropriate straight ... 'while bending onwards towards more

 

Cause of the strain ... never of name

effectual trump ... ‘drain-only blame

Predator dream …’upon wishes of sin

‘the normalized wonder ... that never hath been

 

Scheming prayer play ... ‘workload of day

fidgeting fret ... ‘to conquer the sway

Buzzing to catch ... the highs of the low

coagulant batch ... ‘the ever-beckoning “show”

 

A reality quaint ... ‘apropos sorrow

‘clinch undertaking ... at the cost of ‘mere borrow

Soggy-sap true ... the bellowing grave

indebted to past ... of the instructional save

 

Sobriety scorn ... psychedelic fetter

unwinding worry ... ‘coming down … as if better

Opiate done ... ‘underneath every other

peaking oblique ... ‘surrendering all sense to the smother

 

Amphetamine rush … barbiturate dunce,

‘wine-whiskey wild ... each every once ...

Twice ... every other ... hard-rocking loss

back-to-work whine ... monkey-back boss

 

No bargaining plea … ‘no judgment of gain

‘freedom to score … a life ever vain

Intoxicate ... ‘wee ... from burn-out to rust

‘hit me up brother ... with the flying through dust

 

Pippalayana

I've always felt one against

I've always felt one against the world on my stance on alcohol. I have a deep interest in all psychoactive substances, but alcohol has always been the most boring substance I've ever come across. Why pour solvent down your throat? Does that high feel good by any means relative all the other substance this universe and our biology offers? Where's that line between being happily tipsy and having the nauseous spins? Alcohol will only have negative effects that far outweigh its positives, especially in the long run. Do people that use it socially almost everyday even think of it's impact on their souls? will your experiences with alcohol have prepared you for death in any way shape or form? All these points bring me to my next question. Why the f*** is a substance that has a recreation dose so close to the lethal dose legal?

Binge drinking is socially acceptable in britain

For a longer analysis of the report try this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/02/britain-d... As a Briton living abroad i am always weary of going out in town on a Friday or saturday night when I am visiting home. Go to any town in England, Scotland or wales at the weekend and it is carnage. British women are almost as big binge drinkers as the men, it's not a pretty sight. Although i like a drink myself I often find that abstinance is a simpler solution.

hopefully more people figure

hopefully more people figure this out, in terms of the hypocrisy that informs drug policies, which if are strictly about harm reduction are failing at their own terms.

shroom with a view

Terrance, bless his heart, often spoke about the "LD 50" and revealed that by the LD50 standard los hongos are very benign. What is unique about Nutt's analysis is he included damage to others, relationships, work, and physical health. It simply reveals what many have learned from first hand experience.

Thanks Chris

...not that this more pragmatic ranking will suddenly (or even gradually) change the landscape of drug legislation in the US. As we've seen with the tobacco lobby in the past, the alcohol lobby will prevail. Just look at who's investing the most money in killing prop 19! (For those who haven't heard, it's the alcohol industry.)

great article~!

great article~!

Fascinating!

Fascinating! I just have one quick question. I wonder if I could pick up an honorary PhD for having realized this when I was fifteen? I could then get an inroad to publish breakthrough research on how I have discovered the EARTH actually revolves around the SUN!!!!!

 

"This just in: NASA scientists, using the latest cybernetic interfaces with molecular cell-forms, have discovered that marijuana may not actually be as harmful as William- Randolph-Hearst-owned newspapers first reported in 1935!"

loler'd

loler'd

So this model says that

So this model says that cannabis is over twice as dangerous as ecstasy? Sorry, not quite.