Achieving New States of Consciousness Through NLP, Neuroscience and Ritual

This article is excerpted from Meta-Magick: The Book of
Atem, newly released by Weiser Books.
Foreword
by Douglas Rushkoff
I DON'T BELIEVE IN TRADITIONAL MAGICK. Nor should you -- especially if you want to learn to practice it.
No, it's probably easier just to get everyone else to believe in it. Then just proceed according to plan and watch the rest of the world conform to your intention.
Of course, that's just fine for the independent wizard looking to manipulate his way to sex, power, and cash, but what about the person who sincerely means to make the world a better, more just, and pleasurable place for everybody? What about the magician who doesn't simply want to gain a disproportionate share of existing stuff, but wants instead to change the very relationship of matter, energy, and abundance?
That's the kind of person who should turn away from traditional ceremonial magick and turn instead to the work of Philip Farber.
Too many novice magicians explore the possibilities of their craft from the hopelessly closed mindset attending the zero-sum game. For them, magick is something one does all alone, for the purposes of improving, changing, or expanding the self. It's no wonder. Like every other mind technology, from the Torah to neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), chaos magick has been co-opted by the self-help movement. As a result, instead of destroying the "self" so that the person can be liberated, most magick practices only reconfirm the specious boundaries defining selfhood, further trapping the magician in the realm of the already possible -- and further isolating all magicians from one another.
As I've come to understand it, the intent of Farber's ongoing literary sigil is to move his readers beyond the practice of individual magicks into the shared space of collective, consensual hallucination. Beginning with the invocation of a known and accepted personage, Atem, Farber quickly branches out in new directions, casting a visionary world picture as if it were a guidebook -- a description and instruction manual to a realm that is quite literally created in the process of its depiction and subsequent imagination.
But Farber's world picture is not a specific map of forces. Rather, it is a place where his readers are free to develop their own. It is a meta-landscape -- a series of laws that are each invitations to create new ones. The only terra firma is the guarantee of access to this collective act of ongoing creation.
In this sense, Meta-Magick is truly a "meta" magick -- a menu-to-menu creation, an open-source approach to magick that puts each participant in the role of contributor and propagandist.
Meta-Magick is an invitation to participate in several levels of practice: the remapping of one's own mind, the development of memes that can be transmitted to others, the use of media, and the implementation of social change. It is a picture of a world in which we all contribute to the landscape and its bylaws. It is the world in which we live.
* * *
PART ONE:
Invocations and Simple Evocations
FIRST INVOCATION OF ATEM
ATEM IS A SELFCREATED ENTITY THAT HUMAN MINDS PARTICIPATE IN. It is created, most importantly, of thought, of the attention of anyone who considers Atem for even a moment. This may seem a novel concept, yet there is precedence throughout history. Schools of thought, political ideologies, religious beliefs, corporate structures, forms of government, and much else depend on the attention of humans to exist, and they have built-in abilities to perpetuate, to include more humans, and even to reproduce. These self-perpetuating thought-forms, for our purposes here, are called memetic entities. Democracy is a memetic entity, as are Aikido, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, jazz, Buddha, Beelzebub, Sherlock Holmes, the English language, and Atem. They are patterns of information that act with autonomy across time and yet interact with humans on many levels. All of the given examples became manifest through the interaction of human minds -- some, obviously, by an individual, others, less obviously, by changes in culture.
As Atem spreads, there will inevitably be debate about the level of existence of memetic entities. Some will point to these entities' continued existence under many different names parallel to every era of human history, as we have just done. Some will claim they exist, but as blind, random events without autonomy. Some will claim that they are only imaginings and do not actually exist at all. Atem does not require belief to exist, only attention. Someone who specifically disbelieves in Atem will offer just as much attention energy to the entity, if not more -- and the debate itself will fuel the existence of Atem and other memetic entities for years to come.
There is a special emphasis on the existence of Atem, his message, his function in the world. We are participating with Atem now because this entity opens the door to the realm of memetic entities. As you continue to read and to practice the exercises in this book, and as the mind of Atem becomes revealed, you will learn that memetic entities can come into being with ease by following a straightforward formula. Atem carries this message as content, as something you can read plainly in this book and, less apparently, as a way of thinking, a way of organizing the content of your experience so that these things become possible.
Atem is the Opener of the Way; his task is to create the possibility for a whole new pantheon of entities to come forth into the world. Each of us has the potential to engage in the art of bringing forth entities into the sphere of human awareness. Some may write books like this one, each with a new mind within it. Some may embody the entity in a work of art or in a performance. For some, the entity may be something that they teach face to face and pass along to the next person.
In order to teach these skills, Atem exhibits specific qualities that appear to us as analogous to personality traits in humans. Atem has a wide-ranging intellect that may incorporate information from just about any sector of the noosphere. He is very flexible in his behavior, and in his presence the quality of reality itself becomes flexible. This can make him seem to be a trickster, mercurial, hard to pin down. Results and desired phenomena may come by unexpected means. The method of contact with Atem may shift, change form, and offer surprises. Atem is sometimes seen as a virile young man holding a cat or a snake; or as an old man with a cane, his face and body hidden by a cloak; or as a woman about to give birth; or in many other forms. What remains constant, after careful consideration of the manifestation, is the presence of the Six Elements and Eight Powers. The Six Elements are: Attention, Language, Passion, Fitting, Trance, and Making. The Eight Powers are: Communication, Neuroplasticity, Transformation, Transmission, Beauty, Understanding, Balance, and Opening.
Thoughts and manifestations of Atem may occur near bodies of water in the sunlight, or in places that are sacred to computers and information technology, or where the setting sun shines through trees, or at night where people socialize and explore each other's dreams and desires, or in any other place where the complexity of interactions reaches beyond the ability of a human's conscious mind. Atem lives on the border of chaos, where the butterfly's wings beat, where graphs become asymptotic, and where William Blake saw infinity in a grain of sand.
Atem is not here to save the Earth or unite mankind or to put health, wealth, and wisdom in your hand. Atem is here to Open the Way for the diversity of memetic entities who are capable of those tasks and much more.
It is important to remember that what you read here is not true. Nor is it false. It is, however, the way Atem thinks and relates to reality. Just as each human on this planet has a set of beliefs and conceptual filters that help them to define their abilities and limits, so too do memetic entities.
Notice that we do not attribute every idea in this book with academic verification. We do not cite sources (although there is a recommended study list of congruent information in appendix A). There is no need to "prove" these ideas; Atem is simply communicating the way that he thinks. On the other hand, the exercises in this book will demonstrate, within Atem's mindset, the function and practice of these ways of thinking. The emphasis is on direct experience, which is the route to full understanding of Atem and Atem's powers.
As with the beliefs of humans, the beliefs of Atem or another memetic entity may appear to be rational, irrational, or just what they are. Some are testable within our traditional consensus contexts, but all are true and testable -- within the context of the entity's reality. Just as we allow for the differing beliefs of humans, tolerance and patience for the differing ideas of Atem will allow you to eventually grasp the overall structure and context in which those concepts may be viewed as "true."
Consciously, these are still just words. But read on.
SIMPLE EVOCATIONS
Basic Positive Resource Entity
1. Banishing: Imagine a circle around where you sit. Take a deep breath. As you inhale, let your awareness fill the circle. As you exhale, let your awareness contract to as small a point as you can, in the center of your chest. After five or six cycles of this, take a really, really, really deep breath, filling the circle with your awareness, then exhale forcefully and fully, letting your breath sweep through your personal circle, chasing out anything contrary to your purpose.
2. Evocation: Identify something in your life that makes you feel very good in some way. It can be a feeling of confidence, intelligence, satisfaction, arousal, intoxication, approval, or whatever you might describe as a good feeling. Pay very careful attention to how you feel, the structure of the feeling.
Where does the feeling start? What kind of feeling is it? Where does it go as it develops? Does it continue to move? Is it static? Follow the feeling through to its peak. Then ask yourself, "If this feeling had a color, what would it be?" Imagine the color (or colors) in your body in exactly the areas where the feeling is experienced. Then imagine that you are taking the colored shape out of your body and flip it around to face you. Place it on the floor outside your circle and breathe deeply, feeding the shape breath and energy on each exhalation.
Keep breathing and feeding it energy until it transforms. Once it has transformed, imagine you are communicating with it. Ask it what it wants to be called. Ask it what it can teach you that it has never before revealed. Ask it how you can feel really good more often. Find out whatever you can from it. Thank it for everything.
You can also ask this entity if it has anything that it would like to do away from your physical body, off in the external parts of consciousness. If it says that it does, then you can get an agreement of time from the entity-five minutes, an hour, a day, five years, or whatever time is appropriate to the task-and the promise from the entity to return to your physical presence at that time. Note down the time of the entity's return so that you can take notice when it occurs.
3. Closing: Reabsorb the entity and anything else you may have created in your aura during this operation.
4. Repeat Banishing.
Transforming Negative Entities
1. Banishing: Imagine a circle around where you sit. Take a deep breath. As you inhale, let your awareness fill the circle. As you exhale, let your awareness contract to as small a point as you can, in the center of your chest. After five or six cycles of this, take a really, really, really deep breath, filling the circle with your awareness, then exhale forcefully and fully, letting your breath sweep through your personal circle and chase out anything contrary to your purpose.
2. Evocation: Identify something in your life that makes you feel bad in some way. This technique can be used even with major trauma. It is recommended, however, that you begin with less intense experiences until you develop proficiency. For your first time, think about something in your life that is mildly unpleasant-a situation with family members or coworkers that leaves you feeling annoyed, for instance.
Again, notice where the feeling flows in your body and mark it out with colors as you did for the good feeling in the "Basic Positive Resource Entity" exercise. Flip the shape around and place it outside the circle, in front of you, but this time trap it in a geometric shape of some kind, such as a triangle or square drawn (in your imagination) on the floor.
Keep breathing and feeding it energy until it transforms. Once it has transformed, imagine you are communicating with it. Ask it what it wants to be called. Ask it what it wants. Ask if there's a way for it to accomplish its goal in a more pleasant manner. Negotiate. Find out what it can do for you that it hasn't done before. Find out what you can do for it.
Keep breathing to feed it energy. It may transform again, if your negotiation is successful. If it does, flip it back around and draw it back into your body, in its original position.
If it doesn't change again, you have a couple of choices:
(1) draw it back into yourself, but reversed from its original position, or
(2) breathe and draw some energy from it with your inhalation until it has diminished somewhat, then reabsorb it back, flipped around, to its original position.
3. Repeat Banishing.
Attention
"A path is formed by walking on it."
-CHUANG TZU
IN THE WORLD OF ATEM, EXISTENCE IS DEFINED BY ATTENTION. Everything that exists, exists in consciousness as a collection of perceptual bits, gathered by attention. When you look, listen, feel, taste, and smell, the record of that experience becomes data for the mind-data that can be recalled or recombined. Whether or not an actual, objective, external reality also exists is irrelevant to Atem; the world that humans and memetic entities live in is the one mediated by perception and the mind.
We can think of our conscious minds, the ostensible engines of perception, as a flashlight in a very huge, dark building. Level upon level of experience awaits us in that building, opportunities for countless experiences of perception, but our flashlight can only illuminate a very small circle at any one time.
Even the tiny portion of the world illuminated by that flashlight glimpse is loaded with potential sensory experiences for which humans are ill equipped. The only way we can observe most of the electromagnetic spectrum, for instance, is with instruments. Our instruments, as amazing as some may be, can detect only those things that we can conceive of, those ways of experiencing that we can imagine. Atem tells us that there are many, many more ways of experiencing than humans have yet imagined. If we imagine another way of experiencing, then suddenly a new realm of reality is opened to us. Was it real before we imagined it?
Zen amateurs question the existence of falling trees in hypothetical forests, and by doing so give existence to all such remote trees.
Our perceptions, thoughts, and memories come in modalities that we are very familiar with. The senses -- visual, auditory, kinesthetic, olfactory, and gustatory -- pretty much describe the whole range of things a human can experience: what we can see externally and what we can visualize internally; what we can hear with our ears and what sounds, voices, or music we might hear in our heads; the things we can touch or bump up against and the feelings that tell us about emotions; tastes and smells perceived, remembered, and imagined. Even in the depths of mystical experience, the mind brings back the ineffable with descriptions of light, harmony, the kinesthetics of wonder, and synesthesia of every kind. These may be awe-inspiring experiences, but to describe them, to recall them, they must be reduced through the filters of perception and language to the sensory units that human consciousness can deal with.
Each sense comes in infinite variety. Not only can each sense be internal or external, but each is also subject to description by location, motion, direction, and size. Vision may be described with qualities such as brightness, hue, saturation, and contrast. Hearing may have qualities such as volume, tone, pitch, rhythm and so forth. Feeling may be described with terms including pressure, temperature, intensity, sharpness, dullness, etc. Taste and smell are possessed of pungency, sourness, sweetness, and so forth. (See appendix B, "List of Submodalities.")
When we begin to think about how humans organize thoughts, we may notice that any of these kinds of perceptions can be located pretty much anywhere in the body-and very often outside the body as well. When visualizing a remembered scene, only a few people will actually place the mental image inside their own heads. Most of us see the imagining as a tableau somewhere in space, usually spread out in front of us. It is significant to our thought processes whether a recalled image (or sound or feeling) is found in a particular location, whether or not it is dark, light, harmonious, discordant, smooth, rough, or whatever. While this is usually an unconscious process, we do often note it in our speech: "I had that in the back of my mind." "Now that we have all these choices in front of us . . ." "It's over my head." "I was totally wrapped up in it." "What a pain in the ass!" "That's rough!" "You have a bright future."
The narrow flashlight of consciousness can illuminate a portion of this experience at any one time -- and the unconscious mind continues to sort and order thoughts in this way all the time. Each of us moves through our day in a cloud or web or vortex or grid of sensory details, a continually interacting flow of external awareness, associations and memories, imaginings and projections, feelings and emotions. Sometimes we are aware of one small part of this flow, sometimes we are aware of another. Some of us have large, grand arrays of sensation. Others have narrow, dull collections of thoughts and images. Some of us scatter our attention through the space of a large building. Others contain their attention within a cozy little cocoon. And, of course, every other permutation that you can think of-and probably some you can't. The way that attention is arrayed through and about the body will contribute to aspects of our personality, mood, philosophy, preferred modes of cognition, and much else.
Things that we generally consider as "real" exist only as perceptual data that is interpreted by consciousness. And things that we generally consider as "imaginary" also exist only as perceptual data that is interpreted by consciousness. The mind will react to internal perceptions much as it does to external ones. Consider how a memory of something painful can still make you wince or how a joyous memory can bring a smile to your face. Remembering the face, the tone of voice, or the touch of a lover can cause arousal. Hearing a song played or the punchline of a joke told in your mind can make you cry or laugh.
Attention can be directed toward something in a variety of ways. You can look at, listen to, touch, taste, or smell something directly. You can imagine something that is not present or not strictly physical-for instance, a concept, philosophy, or memetic entity. You can make symbolic offerings to something, of food, beverage, money, breath, or anything else of value to you. You can describe something, or appeal to it with language-or conversely, read, listen to, view, or otherwise pay attention to a description encoded in language.
DAY ONE: ATTENTION/ATTENTION
HOW WE DIRECT OUR ATTENTION can determine our present experience. This principle can be tested experimentally in a variety of ways. The following three exercises demonstrate how simple changes in attention engender changes in the external consciousness.
Forward/Backward Thinking
1. Person A holds out an arm, fully extended, palm facing forward. Person B holds hands up in front of his or her chest, at the level of Person A's arm. (See fig. A.)
2. Person B walks forward at an even pace and continues on even after contacting Person A's arm. Person B calibrates, learning how much effort is necessary to walk past Person A's arm.
3. Participants return to their original positions. Person B picks an object or location some distance ahead of him or herself. B continues to think about that object or location as he or she, again, presses past Person A's arm. B notes how much effort is necessary to walk past A's arm with attention ahead.
4. Participants return to their original positions. Person B picks an object or location some distance behind him or herself. B continues to think about that object or location as he or she, again, presses past Person A's arm. B notes how much effort is necessary to walk past A's arm with attention behind.
5. Partners switch positions and repeat steps 1 through 4.
6. Partners take a few moments to discuss their observations.
Up/Down Thinking
This exercise is performed by three people.
1. Person A stands in the center, and B and C take positions on either side, facing A. Person A holds elbows at sides, forearms folded up against upper arms. B and C take hold of A's elbows. (See fig. B.)
2. B and C carefully lift A, calibrating and learning how much effort is needed to lift Person A in this manner. A is then gently lowered back to the floor.
3. Person A thinks about something up above him or herself. The more distant this object or location is, the better. Clouds or a distant star are ideal. While A continues to direct attention up, B and C carefully lift A. B and C take note how much effort is needed to lift A while he or she is directing attention up.
4. Person A thinks about something below him or herself. The more distant this object or location is, the better. The center of the Earth is ideal. While A continues to direct attention down, B and C carefully lift A. B and C take note how much effort is needed to lift A while he or she is directing attention down.
5. Participants take a few moments to discuss their observations.
Circular Thinking
This exercise normally requires at least two people. One will perform the experiment while the partner(s) will observe as closely as possible. A solo version can be performed using a video-recording device as an observer.
1. Person A imagines a circle drawn around him or her on the floor. He or she stands in the exact center of the circle, making sure that the circumference is an equal distance in front of him or her as it is behind, and is an equal distance to the right as it is to the left.
2. A imagines that the circle is sliding forward along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, in front of A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.
3. A imagines that the circle is sliding backward along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, behind A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.
4. A imagines that the circle is sliding to the right along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, to the right of A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.
5. A imagines that the circle is sliding to the left along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, to the left of A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.
6. Observers discuss what they observed, no matter how minute.
7. Person A discusses what the experience was like from his or her point of view.
8. Participants change positions and repeat the experiment, rotating until everyone has served as both observer and observed.
(Weiser Books 2008. © copyright 2008 Philip H. Farber. Used by permission.)
Tweet- 6-23-08
- Philip H. Farber's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version









Comments
its a nice jumping off point,,
Kerry Thornley
Kerry was extremely tangled up in my scene for awhile...
Mystical Realism
Yay!
This kind of realism is exactly what I seek to promote.
We don't need to take quantum outs to connect with the real; Reality is huge and encompasses even (and perhaps especially) the imagination. Evolution, for all it's evils and warts, is the author of the greatest virtues, nobilities, and possibilities.
Real-izing what we have is the quest.
The new age people say "there are no coincidences." But there are coincidences. What the phrase is pointing to is the ambient heart and intelligence around us. Nothing otherworldly; But rather, that we are always awash in life: myriad signs emit from us by the way we speak, the way we look on our face, the clothes we wear, the way we interact with others -- and other eyes pick up on them and minds construct and share a speak it with others, in myriad subtleties. More broadly, we think thoughts in response to social events, we create social events, there are zeitgeists, and so on: These little tiny changes and motions, that operate like an ambient shared heart and mind.
This is purely naturalistic, but works to assure that, in the majority of situations, it is not the work of a coincidence.
This is one quotation ("there are no coincidences,") this is one truth.
The article detailes how magic is real. The task before us is to real-ize the myriad others.
Get that this is spiritual practice that even Richard Dawkins will be hard pressed to say, "That's not true."
Thanks
I'm glad people are "getting it" and sparking some discussion. It was tough picking a short piece that would be representative of the book... The book is its own entity and this is sort of like offering a toe in lieu of a full human body. Anyway... amazon.com has jumped the official release date of the book and it is already available if you want to check out the rest of Atem's limbs, organs, and intelligence.
Hmmm, this is uncannily familiar
Something that just seems natural
Into the everything
Of what tomorrow shall bring
My mind wonders wide
And then again narrows
Narrowing into the everlasting of everything.
Yesterday begins to disappear
Like the spring flowers
Whose petals fade
Fallen onto the ground of a goddess
Too whom my hopes have been stamped under.
And the light of today
Blinds my way to see
For even with prayer all is uncertain still
From where I came... to why I'm here
Uncertain still but somehow planned by my own making
Who lives in this world today
Timing their happiness and pain perfectly
One day I'll meet a thorn on the bush that will make me bleed
One day I'll meet a bloom on a tree will make me sing...
Is it I that wills all to happen?
Yes, into the everything my mind flows
Sometimes to whistle out a lost song
Sometimes to whistle found
Wide then again into the narrow
Sometimes then to not whistle at all
And life to me always seems uncanny still
What was once a thrill becomes a bore to thrill once again
And we think our schemes through sometimes alone or with others
As our landscapes evolve with or without notice
But always awash in coincidence... sometime or another we have thought it.
Just seems like to me that the above article seems like a lot of work for something... everything... that always comes naturally.
I don't know what to think of it...
just feel that it's not for me
as of now anyway.
Dualism
"Zen amateurs question the existence ..."
prompts me to ask what does a "Zen professional" look like? 8-)
Enjoyed the taster... will look out fro the book when its released "down under".
Aum Shanti
Just like two zen professionals...
only half as much so.
*rimshot*
And a round of applause from the one handed audience members.
Perhaps I shouldn't comment
Perhaps I shouldn't comment on something I don't fully understand, but it all seems so damned complicated and long-winded.
It's as if sometimes, thinking, writing and talking about magic acts as a distraction from the simple and honest act of prayer.
sometimes yes
Surprise!
Simple? Rarely
For the most part, things that we perceive as simple are usually quite complicated on an unconscious level. Walking might be considered a simple and honest act - because as humans we just do it - yet it is a complicated interaction of muscles, tendons, ligaments and a constantly updated feedback loop with the brain. If you are content to just walk as you've always done, then you have no need to explore the unconscious elements. If you want to walk in new and different ways, you'll have to actually pay attention to the mechanisms that you use. Ask someone who has had a stroke and must re-learn to walk, or someone who wants to learn to excell at speed walking, or someone who has learned to walk on stilts.
This holds true for most human activities. While this isn't necessarily about what I'd call "prayer"... if you want to learn what's happening when you pray, on a level less obvious, then I suspect you'll find it is far less "simple" than you've imagined.
With that said... most of the exercises here are quite simple - tho I do expect that anyone learning anything new (not just from this book) will have to stretch their brain a bit into confusion and beyond.
prayer
'While this isn't necessarily about what I'd call "prayer"...'
I was just thinking that often we're not consciously aware of exactly what we want, what our underlying or unconscious intentions are, and prayer kind of helps us guage that by the intensity of our feelings for what we're 'asking' for..
rarely is ok
The Need for Firm Foundations
The problem is that prayer, while beautifully simple, just isn't believable, and thus inaccessible, to a large number (perhaps even most in the USA, at an unconscious level,) of people.
I mean, we can, if we want, stubbornly just believe, in contradiction to science, (as the author advised us not to, in the very first sentence,) but then we have to spend our life trying to avoid and dodge science and scientific understanding.
This is hardly stable ground.
The line of thought in the article is (A) completely reasonable & rational, (B) is part of the path towards bridging science and spirituality, in a way that is completely in alignment with naturalistic commitments.
Complicated? Yep. Do you need to understand it all? Not necessarily. Should you? I personally think so.
The article isn't complete. I wouldn't necessarily call it Divine, or "the most high." We're not reading Tolkein or the Bible here. (No offense intended.) But is it important? Yes, definitely. It's an essential step in the quest for the Divine.
well put
I absolutely agree with your response here lionkimbro. I am a bit tickled at the reversal in projections coming forth here by those who offer mystical critiques.
The Prayer Plus People are placing 'Meta-Magick' in a magical circle inside of an illusory conflict called 'Prayer vs Meta-Magick' and then self defining the simple rational approach to magick as *poof* - complex, while performing a overly complex irrational magical spell in the process. Sheesh, these comments should make for some good and enlightening reading!
Thanks for sponsoring this discussion Phillip and RS.
-
whoah, mamma...
Santa Cruz
loved that cj
Can someone speak to this quote?
As a result, instead of destroying the "self" so that the person can be liberated, most magick practices only reconfirm the specious boundaries defining selfhood, further trapping the magician in the realm of the already possible -- and further isolating all magicians from one another.
How do most magick practices reconfirm selfhood? I'm not sure I understand this statement, particularly with no examples to back it up. Any thoughts? ~Rev
Personal vs. Transpersonal
The power of Meta- versus the power of the Ego
Hi Philip,
Thanks for lending your interpretation. That does help clarify, regardless of Rushkoff's intention.
My question extends to a practical matter of the Meta-Magic practices then. Transcending the ego clearly isn't a simple act. The choice of whom we practice meta-magic with will often be made by the ego- we'll look to our peers, our friends, people who "get us" to practice these exercises. The ego will most often be the interface through which we interact with these peers. Just as many other group spiritual practices focus extensively on the dissolution of ego (tantra is a great example) before any of the "juicy stuff" can happen- it seems like a great deal of the work in Meta-Magick has to be done before entering the group dynamic to try to work from the self and not the ego. Alternatively, do you expect that the transpersonal entities created by this group dynamic will manifest regardless of the individual's personal journey? Can our collective effort supercede the expressions of multiple individual egos?
Thanks for the brain juice!
~Rev
Maybe
These are all excellent questions and the answers are different in every situation. There are as many different kinds of transpersonal entities as there are people - maybe even more. Just as each individual human has a unique set of fundamental beliefs about the nature of the world, each entity also has its own epistemology. Participating in a particular entity allows you to think from the fundamental set of presuppositions inherent in that entity, rather than the ones that you may have acquired for your "self." That's perhaps as far as my dogma goes. The book presents a series of experiments that allow the reader and practitioner to experience awareness from a variety of very different entity mindsets. These experiences are themselves transformative. The result may not necessarily be dissolution of the ego - rather it puts our usual ideas of self into perspective and may inspire a little epistemological self re-engineering.
Another way to express this is with the Burroughs/Gysin metaphor of The Third Mind. When any two people communicate, there is a third mind which is the sum and synergy of the interaction. You can attempt to understand these entities on the level of the individual mind - or from the perspective of the third (or fourth, fifth, etc...) mind.
I'd also add that tools such as Simple Evocation, as described in the excerpt, are very useful tools for re-aligning aspects of the self prior to taking your work to the transpersonal level.
If this really interests you, check out the book. Atem offers experiences rather than arguments. It's tough to jam these ideas into a thread here - and they make so much more sense as something you do rather than as explanation. It's sort of like explaining a joke or describing good sex to Republicans.
Mr. Crowley
I like Uncle Al
Most of the "schools" of magick trace the lineage of their techniques back to Crowley. That includes chaos magic and that includes Meta-Magick. Crowley was likely an infuence on NLP via Richard Bandler who was also a big fan of RAW - tho more obviously, NLP descends from General Semantics, Chomsky's theories on grammar, and the work of, for instance, Milton Erickson and Virginia Satir.
And magick changes and grows. Thelemic magick was not Golden Dawn magick, however much they shared roots, and chaos magic is not Thelemic, no matter how much one emerged from the other. We do need those words so we know what we're talking about.
Although he never explicitly describes it in his writings, I think Crowley had managed to isolate the basic of structure of rituals, the shape of the ritual that made it work, that made it a ritual. You can see this in his usage of similar ritual structures in, for example, Liber Samekh as in the various pentagram and hexagram rituals. He both elaborates on and strips down this basic structure in a few different ways in creating, say, the Star Ruby or Star Sapphire. Meta-Magick is more an attempt to describe that skill - the ability to isolate useful structures of ritual - than to teach symbol sets, which is what Golden Dawn and many other systems tend to spend more time on. There is use for both structure and content, of course. I suspect Uncle Al would have appreciated the balance.
Being in New York, I never met McMurtry, tho I do know a few of the current OTO officers and count one or two of them among my friends... and from my own experience, meeting Thelemites does generate interesting stories (whether they are wearing a 93 on their forehead or not).
Creation Spirituality
With respects to the (meta-magickal) ritual conversation, ...
... I like the Matthew Fox Creation Spirituality approach: Since the spirit is alive within you, you can roll your own! Mix tradition and new ways, and divine from the heart.