Achieving New States of Consciousness Through NLP, Neuroscience and Ritual

bookofatembigMMcoverFullZ1.jpg

This article is excerpted from Meta-Magick: The Book of Atem, newly released by Weiser Books.


Foreword

by Douglas Rushkoff

I DON'T BELIEVE IN TRADITIONAL MAGICK. Nor should you -- especially if you want to learn to practice it.

No, it's probably easier just to get everyone else to believe in it. Then just proceed according to plan and watch the rest of the world conform to your intention.

Of course, that's just fine for the independent wizard looking to manipulate his way to sex, power, and cash, but what about the person who sincerely means to make the world a better, more just, and pleasurable place for everybody? What about the magician who doesn't simply want to gain a disproportionate share of existing stuff, but wants instead to change the very relationship of matter, energy, and abundance?

That's the kind of person who should turn away from traditional ceremonial magick and turn instead to the work of Philip Farber.

Too many novice magicians explore the possibilities of their craft from the hopelessly closed mindset attending the zero-sum game. For them, magick is something one does all alone, for the purposes of improving, changing, or expanding the self. It's no wonder. Like every other mind technology, from the Torah to neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), chaos magick has been co-opted by the self-help movement. As a result, instead of destroying the "self" so that the person can be liberated, most magick practices only reconfirm the specious boundaries defining selfhood, further trapping the magician in the realm of the already possible -- and further isolating all magicians from one another.

As I've come to understand it, the intent of Farber's ongoing literary sigil is to move his readers beyond the practice of individual magicks into the shared space of collective, consensual hallucination. Beginning with the invocation of a known and accepted personage, Atem, Farber quickly branches out in new directions, casting a visionary world picture as if it were a guidebook -- a description and instruction manual to a realm that is quite literally created in the process of its depiction and subsequent imagination.

But Farber's world picture is not a specific map of forces. Rather, it is a place where his readers are free to develop their own. It is a meta-landscape -- a series of laws that are each invitations to create new ones. The only terra firma is the guarantee of access to this collective act of ongoing creation.

In this sense, Meta-Magick is truly a "meta" magick -- a menu-to-menu creation, an open-source approach to magick that puts each participant in the role of contributor and propagandist.

Meta-Magick is an invitation to participate in several levels of practice: the remapping of one's own mind, the development of memes that can be transmitted to others, the use of media, and the implementation of social change. It is a picture of a world in which we all contribute to the landscape and its bylaws. It is the world in which we live.

 

* * *



PART ONE:
Invocations and Simple Evocations


FIRST INVOCATION OF ATEM


ATEM IS A SELFCREATED ENTITY THAT HUMAN MINDS PARTICIPATE IN. It is created, most importantly, of thought, of the attention of anyone who considers Atem for even a moment. This may seem a novel concept, yet there is precedence throughout history. Schools of thought, political ideologies, religious beliefs, corporate structures, forms of government, and much else depend on the attention of humans to exist, and they have built-in abilities to perpetuate, to include more humans, and even to reproduce. These self-perpetuating thought-forms, for our purposes here, are called memetic entities. Democracy is a memetic entity, as are Aikido, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, jazz, Buddha, Beelzebub, Sherlock Holmes, the English language, and Atem. They are patterns of information that act with autonomy across time and yet interact with humans on many levels. All of the given examples became manifest through the interaction of human minds -- some, obviously, by an individual, others, less obviously, by changes in culture.

As Atem spreads, there will inevitably be debate about the level of existence of memetic entities. Some will point to these entities' continued existence under many different names parallel to every era of human history, as we have just done. Some will claim they exist, but as blind, random events without autonomy. Some will claim that they are only imaginings and do not actually exist at all. Atem does not require belief to exist, only attention. Someone who specifically disbelieves in Atem will offer just as much attention energy to the entity, if not more -- and the debate itself will fuel the existence of Atem and other memetic entities for years to come.

There is a special emphasis on the existence of Atem, his message, his function in the world. We are participating with Atem now because this entity opens the door to the realm of memetic entities. As you continue to read and to practice the exercises in this book, and as the mind of Atem becomes revealed, you will learn that memetic entities can come into being with ease by following a straightforward formula. Atem carries this message as content, as something you can read plainly in this book and, less apparently, as a way of thinking, a way of organizing the content of your experience so that these things become possible.

Atem is the Opener of the Way; his task is to create the possibility for a whole new pantheon of entities to come forth into the world. Each of us has the potential to engage in the art of bringing forth entities into the sphere of human awareness. Some may write books like this one, each with a new mind within it. Some may embody the entity in a work of art or in a performance. For some, the entity may be something that they teach face to face and pass along to the next person.

In order to teach these skills, Atem exhibits specific qualities that appear to us as analogous to personality traits in humans. Atem has a wide-ranging intellect that may incorporate information from just about any sector of the noosphere. He is very flexible in his behavior, and in his presence the quality of reality itself becomes flexible. This can make him seem to be a trickster, mercurial, hard to pin down. Results and desired phenomena may come by unexpected means. The method of contact with Atem may shift, change form, and offer surprises. Atem is sometimes seen as a virile young man holding a cat or a snake; or as an old man with a cane, his face and body hidden by a cloak; or as a woman about to give birth; or in many other forms. What remains constant, after careful consideration of the manifestation, is the presence of the Six Elements and Eight Powers. The Six Elements are: Attention, Language, Passion, Fitting, Trance, and Making. The Eight Powers are: Communication, Neuroplasticity, Transformation, Transmission, Beauty, Understanding, Balance, and Opening.

Thoughts and manifestations of Atem may occur near bodies of water in the sunlight, or in places that are sacred to computers and information technology, or where the setting sun shines through trees, or at night where people socialize and explore each other's dreams and desires, or in any other place where the complexity of interactions reaches beyond the ability of a human's conscious mind. Atem lives on the border of chaos, where the butterfly's wings beat, where graphs become asymptotic, and where William Blake saw infinity in a grain of sand.

Atem is not here to save the Earth or unite mankind or to put health, wealth, and wisdom in your hand. Atem is here to Open the Way for the diversity of memetic entities who are capable of those tasks and much more.

 

It is important to remember that what you read here is not true. Nor is it false. It is, however, the way Atem thinks and relates to reality. Just as each human on this planet has a set of beliefs and conceptual filters that help them to define their abilities and limits, so too do memetic entities.

Notice that we do not attribute every idea in this book with academic verification. We do not cite sources (although there is a recommended study list of congruent information in appendix A). There is no need to "prove" these ideas; Atem is simply communicating the way that he thinks. On the other hand, the exercises in this book will demonstrate, within Atem's mindset, the function and practice of these ways of thinking. The emphasis is on direct experience, which is the route to full understanding of Atem and Atem's powers.

As with the beliefs of humans, the beliefs of Atem or another memetic entity may appear to be rational, irrational, or just what they are. Some are testable within our traditional consensus contexts, but all are true and testable -- within the context of the entity's reality. Just as we allow for the differing beliefs of humans, tolerance and patience for the differing ideas of Atem will allow you to eventually grasp the overall structure and context in which those concepts may be viewed as "true."

Consciously, these are still just words. But read on.


SIMPLE EVOCATIONS

Basic Positive Resource Entity

1. Banishing: Imagine a circle around where you sit. Take a deep breath. As you inhale, let your awareness fill the circle. As you exhale, let your awareness contract to as small a point as you can, in the center of your chest. After five or six cycles of this, take a really, really, really deep breath, filling the circle with your awareness, then exhale forcefully and fully, letting your breath sweep through your personal circle, chasing out anything contrary to your purpose.

2. Evocation: Identify something in your life that makes you feel very good in some way. It can be a feeling of confidence, intelligence, satisfaction, arousal, intoxication, approval, or whatever you might describe as a good feeling. Pay very careful attention to how you feel, the structure of the feeling.

Where does the feeling start? What kind of feeling is it? Where does it go as it develops? Does it continue to move? Is it static? Follow the feeling through to its peak. Then ask yourself, "If this feeling had a color, what would it be?" Imagine the color (or colors) in your body in exactly the areas where the feeling is experienced. Then imagine that you are taking the colored shape out of your body and flip it around to face you. Place it on the floor outside your circle and breathe deeply, feeding the shape breath and energy on each exhalation.

Keep breathing and feeding it energy until it transforms. Once it has transformed, imagine you are communicating with it. Ask it what it wants to be called. Ask it what it can teach you that it has never before revealed. Ask it how you can feel really good more often. Find out whatever you can from it. Thank it for everything.

You can also ask this entity if it has anything that it would like to do away from your physical body, off in the external parts of consciousness. If it says that it does, then you can get an agreement of time from the entity-five minutes, an hour, a day, five years, or whatever time is appropriate to the task-and the promise from the entity to return to your physical presence at that time. Note down the time of the entity's return so that you can take notice when it occurs.

3. Closing: Reabsorb the entity and anything else you may have created in your aura during this operation.

4. Repeat Banishing.

Transforming Negative Entities

1. Banishing: Imagine a circle around where you sit. Take a deep breath. As you inhale, let your awareness fill the circle. As you exhale, let your awareness contract to as small a point as you can, in the center of your chest. After five or six cycles of this, take a really, really, really deep breath, filling the circle with your awareness, then exhale forcefully and fully, letting your breath sweep through your personal circle and chase out anything contrary to your purpose.

2. Evocation: Identify something in your life that makes you feel bad in some way. This technique can be used even with major trauma. It is recommended, however, that you begin with less intense experiences until you develop proficiency. For your first time, think about something in your life that is mildly unpleasant-a situation with family members or coworkers that leaves you feeling annoyed, for instance.

Again, notice where the feeling flows in your body and mark it out with colors as you did for the good feeling in the "Basic Positive Resource Entity" exercise. Flip the shape around and place it outside the circle, in front of you, but this time trap it in a geometric shape of some kind, such as a triangle or square drawn (in your imagination) on the floor.

Keep breathing and feeding it energy until it transforms. Once it has transformed, imagine you are communicating with it. Ask it what it wants to be called. Ask it what it wants. Ask if there's a way for it to accomplish its goal in a more pleasant manner. Negotiate. Find out what it can do for you that it hasn't done before. Find out what you can do for it.

Keep breathing to feed it energy. It may transform again, if your negotiation is successful. If it does, flip it back around and draw it back into your body, in its original position.

If it doesn't change again, you have a couple of choices:

(1) draw it back into yourself, but reversed from its original position, or

(2) breathe and draw some energy from it with your inhalation until it has diminished somewhat, then reabsorb it back, flipped around, to its original position.

3. Repeat Banishing.

Attention

"A path is formed by walking on it."
-CHUANG TZU

IN THE WORLD OF ATEM, EXISTENCE IS DEFINED BY ATTENTION. Everything that exists, exists in consciousness as a collection of perceptual bits, gathered by attention. When you look, listen, feel, taste, and smell, the record of that experience becomes data for the mind-data that can be recalled or recombined. Whether or not an actual, objective, external reality also exists is irrelevant to Atem; the world that humans and memetic entities live in is the one mediated by perception and the mind.

We can think of our conscious minds, the ostensible engines of perception, as a flashlight in a very huge, dark building. Level upon level of experience awaits us in that building, opportunities for countless experiences of perception, but our flashlight can only illuminate a very small circle at any one time.

Even the tiny portion of the world illuminated by that flashlight glimpse is loaded with potential sensory experiences for which humans are ill equipped. The only way we can observe most of the electromagnetic spectrum, for instance, is with instruments. Our instruments, as amazing as some may be, can detect only those things that we can conceive of, those ways of experiencing that we can imagine. Atem tells us that there are many, many more ways of experiencing than humans have yet imagined. If we imagine another way of experiencing, then suddenly a new realm of reality is opened to us. Was it real before we imagined it?

Zen amateurs question the existence of falling trees in hypothetical forests, and by doing so give existence to all such remote trees.

Our perceptions, thoughts, and memories come in modalities that we are very familiar with. The senses -- visual, auditory, kinesthetic, olfactory, and gustatory -- pretty much describe the whole range of things a human can experience: what we can see externally and what we can visualize internally; what we can hear with our ears and what sounds, voices, or music we might hear in our heads; the things we can touch or bump up against and the feelings that tell us about emotions; tastes and smells perceived, remembered, and imagined. Even in the depths of mystical experience, the mind brings back the ineffable with descriptions of light, harmony, the kinesthetics of wonder, and synesthesia of every kind. These may be awe-inspiring experiences, but to describe them, to recall them, they must be reduced through the filters of perception and language to the sensory units that human consciousness can deal with.

Each sense comes in infinite variety. Not only can each sense be internal or external, but each is also subject to description by location, motion, direction, and size. Vision may be described with qualities such as brightness, hue, saturation, and contrast. Hearing may have qualities such as volume, tone, pitch, rhythm and so forth. Feeling may be described with terms including pressure, temperature, intensity, sharpness, dullness, etc. Taste and smell are possessed of pungency, sourness, sweetness, and so forth. (See appendix B, "List of Submodalities.")

When we begin to think about how humans organize thoughts, we may notice that any of these kinds of perceptions can be located pretty much anywhere in the body-and very often outside the body as well. When visualizing a remembered scene, only a few people will actually place the mental image inside their own heads. Most of us see the imagining as a tableau somewhere in space, usually spread out in front of us. It is significant to our thought processes whether a recalled image (or sound or feeling) is found in a particular location, whether or not it is dark, light, harmonious, discordant, smooth, rough, or whatever. While this is usually an unconscious process, we do often note it in our speech: "I had that in the back of my mind." "Now that we have all these choices in front of us . . ." "It's over my head." "I was totally wrapped up in it." "What a pain in the ass!" "That's rough!" "You have a bright future."

The narrow flashlight of consciousness can illuminate a portion of this experience at any one time -- and the unconscious mind continues to sort and order thoughts in this way all the time. Each of us moves through our day in a cloud or web or vortex or grid of sensory details, a continually interacting flow of external awareness, associations and memories, imaginings and projections, feelings and emotions. Sometimes we are aware of one small part of this flow, sometimes we are aware of another. Some of us have large, grand arrays of sensation. Others have narrow, dull collections of thoughts and images. Some of us scatter our attention through the space of a large building. Others contain their attention within a cozy little cocoon. And, of course, every other permutation that you can think of-and probably some you can't. The way that attention is arrayed through and about the body will contribute to aspects of our personality, mood, philosophy, preferred modes of cognition, and much else.

Things that we generally consider as "real" exist only as perceptual data that is interpreted by consciousness. And things that we generally consider as "imaginary" also exist only as perceptual data that is interpreted by consciousness. The mind will react to internal perceptions much as it does to external ones. Consider how a memory of something painful can still make you wince or how a joyous memory can bring a smile to your face. Remembering the face, the tone of voice, or the touch of a lover can cause arousal. Hearing a song played or the punchline of a joke told in your mind can make you cry or laugh.

Attention can be directed toward something in a variety of ways. You can look at, listen to, touch, taste, or smell something directly. You can imagine something that is not present or not strictly physical-for instance, a concept, philosophy, or memetic entity. You can make symbolic offerings to something, of food, beverage, money, breath, or anything else of value to you. You can describe something, or appeal to it with language-or conversely, read, listen to, view, or otherwise pay attention to a description encoded in language.


DAY ONE: ATTENTION/ATTENTION

HOW WE DIRECT OUR ATTENTION can determine our present experience. This principle can be tested experimentally in a variety of ways. The following three exercises demonstrate how simple changes in attention engender changes in the external consciousness.

 

Forward/Backward Thinking

1. Person A holds out an arm, fully extended, palm facing forward. Person B holds hands up in front of his or her chest, at the level of Person A's arm. (See fig. A.)

2. Person B walks forward at an even pace and continues on even after contacting Person A's arm. Person B calibrates, learning how much effort is necessary to walk past Person A's arm.

3. Participants return to their original positions. Person B picks an object or location some distance ahead of him or herself. B continues to think about that object or location as he or she, again, presses past Person A's arm. B notes how much effort is necessary to walk past A's arm with attention ahead.

4. Participants return to their original positions. Person B picks an object or location some distance behind him or herself. B continues to think about that object or location as he or she, again, presses past Person A's arm. B notes how much effort is necessary to walk past A's arm with attention behind.

5. Partners switch positions and repeat steps 1 through 4.

6. Partners take a few moments to discuss their observations.


Up/Down Thinking

This exercise is performed by three people.

1. Person A stands in the center, and B and C take positions on either side, facing A. Person A holds elbows at sides, forearms folded up against upper arms. B and C take hold of A's elbows. (See fig. B.)


2. B and C carefully lift A, calibrating and learning how much effort is needed to lift Person A in this manner. A is then gently lowered back to the floor.

3. Person A thinks about something up above him or herself. The more distant this object or location is, the better. Clouds or a distant star are ideal. While A continues to direct attention up, B and C carefully lift A. B and C take note how much effort is needed to lift A while he or she is directing attention up.

4. Person A thinks about something below him or herself. The more distant this object or location is, the better. The center of the Earth is ideal. While A continues to direct attention down, B and C carefully lift A. B and C take note how much effort is needed to lift A while he or she is directing attention down.

5. Participants take a few moments to discuss their observations.

Circular Thinking

This exercise normally requires at least two people. One will perform the experiment while the partner(s) will observe as closely as possible. A solo version can be performed using a video-recording device as an observer.

1. Person A imagines a circle drawn around him or her on the floor. He or she stands in the exact center of the circle, making sure that the circumference is an equal distance in front of him or her as it is behind, and is an equal distance to the right as it is to the left.

2. A imagines that the circle is sliding forward along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, in front of A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.

3. A imagines that the circle is sliding backward along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, behind A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.

4. A imagines that the circle is sliding to the right along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, to the right of A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.

5. A imagines that the circle is sliding to the left along the floor, until it has moved, in its entirety, to the left of A. A holds this imagining for a moment, then returns the circle to its original position.

6. Observers discuss what they observed, no matter how minute.

7. Person A discusses what the experience was like from his or her point of view.

8. Participants change positions and repeat the experiment, rotating until everyone has served as both observer and observed.

(Weiser Books 2008. © copyright 2008 Philip H. Farber. Used by permission.)

Comments

its a nice jumping off point,,

I like the physicality and non-goaloriented approach of the exercises, it reminds me a bit of my good friend the late Kerry Thornley's book Zenarchy. Its nice to see an approach to Chaos Majick that goes beyond sendups of Santa Ria or fetishizing the eight point Psychic TV chaos star/cross to bend and warp the spacetime continuum and plays around with the sometimes goofy, sometimes profound mind/body interpersonal connection and the infinite surprises that surface when you tinker with it. Using the recipes as starting point you could play around with the conceptual framework maybe and pretend your on a group building seminar for some whacky corporation whose only product is happiness. The possibilities are endless...

Kerry Thornley

I never met Kerry, though I was friends with his partner-in-discordia Greg Hill for some years online. Nonetheless, I imagine one might be able to trace some common roots in our work. Most of Meta-Magick: The Book of Atem is exercises and, yes, some of them can be quite goofy.

Kerry was extremely tangled up in my scene for awhile...

we did some secret projects w/ a small group of friends and among those in Little five points scene here in Atlanta that could get past his rampant paranoia there are a lot of twisted stories,,,anyway I like what I see so far with the book.

Mystical Realism

Yay!

This kind of realism is exactly what I seek to promote.

We don't need to take quantum outs to connect with the real; Reality is huge and encompasses even (and perhaps especially) the imagination. Evolution, for all it's evils and warts, is the author of the greatest virtues, nobilities, and possibilities.

Real-izing what we have is the quest.

The new age people say "there are no coincidences." But there are coincidences. What the phrase is pointing to is the ambient heart and intelligence around us. Nothing otherworldly; But rather, that we are always awash in life: myriad signs emit from us by the way we speak, the way we look on our face, the clothes we wear, the way we interact with others -- and other eyes pick up on them and minds construct and share a speak it with others, in myriad subtleties. More broadly, we think thoughts in response to social events, we create social events, there are zeitgeists, and so on: These little tiny changes and motions, that operate like an ambient shared heart and mind.

This is purely naturalistic, but works to assure that, in the majority of situations, it is not the work of a coincidence.

This is one quotation ("there are no coincidences,") this is one truth.

The article detailes how magic is real. The task before us is to real-ize the myriad others.

Get that this is spiritual practice that even Richard Dawkins will be hard pressed to say, "That's not true."

i perfer to call it Synchronicity/Zeitgiest/coincedence

"i call it after the Surrealists: Objective Chance", as a working philosophy/psychology that allows for the element of a chance encounter, to become something other, to kind of do an exercise in holding judgement about some interaction between one transaction and another. Certainly in the realm of the actual practice of a Quantum Physicist certain positions are observed and figured in any further development that gather data and depend on the factor on either side of the equasion, obviously in the realm of philosophy or metaphysics we are seeing a similar exchange, but here we are moving in the conceptual/metaphor with more allowance for the language to breathe.

If one looks at the objective chance phenomenon, and begins to see the occurrence of this in real life, it is perhaps because one is paying attention to the rhythm of its quality and when it becomes a quantity, one then might utter at some point " there are no coincidences" this does not mean that you suddenly believe in some mysterious mumbo jumbo and have suddenly become a "new ager" it does not mean that you lost your objective ground and have now eliminated the word coincidence from your vocabulary. it merely means that another layer of experience has been added to the previous standard brand reality that we are all conditioned to, including scientists, religionists, everyday enforcers of some base line that causes some to see the world in linear perspective, as if God or Newton were the only possible source for our current evolution(the watered down Darwin) or creationist (myth with fixed ideas). One uses the apple as an object lesson and calls it the fruit of good and evil, the other sees that fruit as a mechanical object falling from a mechanical tree, and calls it gravity, by observing the velocity at which it comes down to the ground, Adam and Eve have sense gotten designer fig leafs and have leashed the snake to a steam engine.

Objective Chance, is not some quaint phrase made up by the most off the wall art movement of the 20th century, it is a actual strange attractor, or hidden variable, or hidden god(fairy?), that appears like the Zietgiest in its many shapes forms and lucky stars.It is the event horizon that links two remote thoughts together, and perhaps is the feather that floats down and lands in your scale at the moment it could go one way or the other.

Thanks

I'm glad people are "getting it" and sparking some discussion. It was tough picking a short piece that would be representative of the book... The book is its own entity and this is sort of like offering a toe in lieu of a full human body. Anyway... amazon.com has jumped the official release date of the book and it is already available if you want to check out the rest of Atem's limbs, organs, and intelligence.

Hmmm, this is uncannily familiar

I think I may rush out and buy this book. Reading it and the introduction to Atem reminded me so much about the birth of a meta idea called O.S. 0 1 2 that myself and a few others took place developing and creating a few years (2002-03) back as a Master Meme for Conflict Resolution and Global Problem solving. Thanks for this introduction!

Something that just seems natural

Into the everything
Of what tomorrow shall bring
My mind wonders wide
And then again narrows
Narrowing into the everlasting of everything.

Yesterday begins to disappear
Like the spring flowers
Whose petals fade
Fallen onto the ground of a goddess
Too whom my hopes have been stamped under.

And the light of today
Blinds my way to see
For even with prayer all is uncertain still
From where I came... to why I'm here
Uncertain still but somehow planned by my own making

Who lives in this world today
Timing their happiness and pain perfectly
One day I'll meet a thorn on the bush that will make me bleed
One day I'll meet a  bloom on a tree will make me sing...
Is it I that wills all to happen?

Yes, into the everything my mind flows
Sometimes to whistle out a lost song
Sometimes to whistle found
Wide then again into the narrow
Sometimes then to not whistle at all

And life to me always seems uncanny still
What was once a thrill becomes a bore to thrill once again
And we think our schemes through sometimes alone or with others
As our landscapes evolve with or without notice
But always awash in coincidence... sometime or another we have thought it.

Just seems like to me that the above article seems like a lot of work for something... everything... that always comes naturally.

I don't know what to think of it...
just feel that it's not for me
as of now anyway.

Dualism

"Zen amateurs question the existence ..."

prompts me to ask what does a "Zen professional" look like? 8-)

 

Enjoyed the taster... will look out fro the book when its released "down under".

 

Aum Shanti

Just like two zen professionals...

only half as much so.

 *rimshot*

 

And a round of applause from the one handed audience members.

Perhaps I shouldn't comment

Perhaps I shouldn't comment on something I don't fully understand, but it all seems so damned complicated and long-winded.

It's as if sometimes, thinking, writing and talking about magic acts as a distraction from the simple and honest act of prayer.

sometimes yes

In general,prayer is either a personal experience or a very controlled group affirmation and doesn't leave much room for surprises within the overall group dynamic. Sure there are other rituals and dogmas, meditations, etc. but this kind of magic is spiritual playtime as complicated or simple as you want. Phillip seems to be throwing a bit of both the simple and the complicated at us.

Surprise!

Surprises! Yes! If you're not surprised, you're probably not learning from whatever your activity.

Simple? Rarely

For the most part, things that we perceive as simple are usually quite complicated on an unconscious level. Walking might be considered a simple and honest act - because as humans we just do it - yet it is a complicated interaction of muscles, tendons, ligaments and a constantly updated feedback loop with the brain. If you are content to just walk as you've always done, then you have no need to explore the unconscious elements. If you want to walk in new and different ways, you'll have to actually pay attention to the mechanisms that you use. Ask someone who has had a stroke and must re-learn to walk, or someone who wants to learn to excell at speed walking, or someone who has learned to walk on stilts.

 

This holds true for most human activities. While this isn't necessarily about what I'd call "prayer"... if you want to learn what's happening when you pray, on a level less obvious, then I suspect you'll find it is far less "simple" than you've imagined.

 

With that said... most of the exercises here are quite simple - tho I do expect that anyone learning anything new (not just from this book) will have to stretch their brain a bit into confusion and beyond.

prayer

'While this isn't necessarily about what I'd call "prayer"...'

I was just thinking that often we're not consciously aware of exactly what we want, what our underlying or unconscious intentions are, and prayer kind of helps us guage that by the intensity of our feelings for what we're 'asking' for..

rarely is ok

just trying to keep the wolves at bay.

The Need for Firm Foundations

The problem is that prayer, while beautifully simple, just isn't believable, and thus inaccessible, to a large number (perhaps even most in the USA, at an unconscious level,) of people.

I mean, we can, if we want, stubbornly just believe, in contradiction to science, (as the author advised us not to, in the very first sentence,) but then we have to spend our life trying to avoid and dodge science and scientific understanding.

This is hardly stable ground.

The line of thought in the article is (A) completely reasonable & rational, (B) is part of the path towards bridging science and spirituality, in a way that is completely in alignment with naturalistic commitments.

Complicated?  Yep.  Do you need to understand it all?  Not necessarily.  Should you?  I personally think so.

The article isn't complete.  I wouldn't necessarily call it Divine, or "the most high."  We're not reading Tolkein or the Bible here.  (No offense intended.)  But is it important?  Yes, definitely.  It's an essential step in the quest for the Divine.

well put

I absolutely agree with your response here lionkimbro. I am a bit tickled at the reversal in projections coming forth here by those who offer mystical critiques.

The Prayer Plus People are placing 'Meta-Magick' in a magical circle inside of an illusory conflict called 'Prayer vs Meta-Magick' and then self defining the simple rational approach to magick as *poof* - complex, while performing a overly complex irrational magical spell in the process. Sheesh, these comments should make for some good and enlightening reading!

Thanks for sponsoring this discussion Phillip and RS.

 

-

-

i was looking at some of

the videos on Philip's site, tring to get a better picture of his approach, anyway i just wanted to say that my interest in Magick began as i began reading lots of poetry, and other literature, also i got my first Tarot Deck, but i think it had a lot to do with the area i lived in, which was Santa Cruz California, i remember taking a jr. collage class in comparative religion, and some guy in the class invited us to a satanic ritual in the hills, i did not go, but that was the kind of thing that was happening in Santa Cruz.But for me magick was something i fell into completely on my own.I just fell into it.IT happened, and then not long after i was reading RAW.I was self-induced into it, then it just was happening around me, I would be reading books in the university library that i hung out at, and one day i was reading about Crowley because his books were in the local book store.

Then I was reading RAW.It was not like I read Raw then i began falling into it, i fell into it on my own like it was just what a hippie poet did.My poet mentor buddy was good at finding strange books for me to read, and he could translate French into English or Spanish, and he was all fired up about Surrealism, but he did not read books about the occult, except that Surrealism was spoken of by Andre Breton in the context of,"the complete occultation of Surrealism" and also he traced the Surrealists back to the Gnostics.Also i never was interested in NLP, as that seemed like another in group that i just was not privy to.But Robert Anton Wilson really seemed to be there just when i needed to understand some of the stuff i had been experienceing.I was like wow, i'm not the only one!

There was a consciousness around me that was happening in the world and it was magick, this was also the magic i had felt in the air of the late 60's i mean not just the trips but the trip around the trip.So for instance when i was reaing books in the university library on say ancient Sumeria, and i would look at some word, and it ment branch, and then i would read that somehow that word connected to the exoteric meaning of Jesus or somethin, and i was thinking about how all this stuff connected down through the ages, and years later i read Holy Blood Holy Grail, and they talked about the bloodline like a branch of families, and the tree of life was now mixed up in my mind with bloodlines, and i would think about stuff that Breton said and i would begin to compare stuff i was reading that Crowley wrote inbetween all the more formal ritual stuff, it would hinge on things that were happening around me at the time, all this linking up of objective chances.That is how the magick worked in my world.

It was never practical, it was all through the poetry, That is the glue that held it all together for me.

whoah, mamma...

and a little Dada, sums up a path I'm very familliar with, thanks for that cj.

Santa Cruz

I grew up in Santa Cruz in the 1980's.  Aptos & Watsonville for the 1990's.

loved that cj

'never practical,it was all through the poetry' You've just defined for me,what i feel spontaneous ritual is,i've always had a problem with planned contrived theatrical workings,i've seen many,participated in many and the ones that prove most fruitful[if thats the right way to put it!]are the moments when it just happens and evolves as it should in that moment.Intention/attention gives it all energy,clarity of thought will keep it centred,but there are times when prayer/intention needs guidance of an certain order...i suppose you have to engage both at different times accordingly to know what is needed and learn for ourselves...good article,reminded me of a lot i've read from the many prophets/profits out there!!!!!Esoterical studies require greater discipline of thought and share very little room with randomness of spontaneous thought,even on this fence there are sitters,belivers and non believers...the ingredients of all of this remain the same but we all have our own ways of breaking eggs!!! Solas agus gra

Can someone speak to this quote?

As a result, instead of destroying the "self" so that the person can be liberated, most magick practices only reconfirm the specious boundaries defining selfhood, further trapping the magician in the realm of the already possible -- and further isolating all magicians from one another.

 

How do most magick practices reconfirm selfhood? I'm not sure I understand this statement, particularly with no examples to back it up. Any thoughts? ~Rev

Personal vs. Transpersonal

Douglas Rushkoff is the author of that particular paragraph and I don't think he's here to comment. My take on it would be that much of Meta-Magick (the book, not the concept or the system) is concerned with transpersonal experience. Many "traditional" forms of magick are concerned with defining the self (for instance, identifying personal resources such as the HGA) or manifesting circumstances and/or stuff that relate to the self. And "high magick" is practiced alone in a personal circle. In contrast, Meta-Magick exercises are often in the context of groups or practiced with partners and aim ultimately at the creation of transpersonal entities that reside in and are composed of many minds. Participating in such entities stretches the boundaries of awareness beyond the simple self/other dichotomy and may help the individual to destroy self-constructs that represent limits. This is just my response to the quote, not a definitive understanding of Rushkoff's intent there.

The power of Meta- versus the power of the Ego

Hi Philip,


Thanks for lending your interpretation.  That does help clarify, regardless of Rushkoff's intention. 

My question extends to a practical matter of the Meta-Magic practices then.  Transcending the ego clearly isn't a simple act.  The choice of whom we practice meta-magic with will often be made by the ego- we'll look to our peers, our friends, people who "get us" to practice these exercises.  The ego will most often be the interface through which we interact with these peers.  Just as many other group spiritual practices focus extensively on the dissolution of ego (tantra is a great example) before any of the "juicy stuff" can happen- it seems like a great deal of the work in Meta-Magick has to be done before entering the group dynamic to try to work from the self and not the ego.    Alternatively, do you expect that the transpersonal entities created by this group dynamic will manifest regardless of the individual's personal journey?  Can our collective effort supercede the expressions of multiple individual egos? 

Thanks for the brain juice!

~Rev

Maybe

These are all excellent questions and the answers are different in every situation. There are as many different kinds of transpersonal entities as there are people - maybe even more. Just as each individual human has a unique set of fundamental beliefs about the nature of the world, each entity also has its own epistemology. Participating in a particular entity allows you to think from the fundamental set of presuppositions inherent in that entity, rather than the ones that you may have acquired for your "self." That's perhaps as far as my dogma goes. The book presents a series of experiments that allow the reader and practitioner to experience awareness from a variety of very different entity mindsets. These experiences are themselves transformative. The result may not necessarily be dissolution of the ego - rather it puts our usual ideas of self into perspective and may inspire a little epistemological self re-engineering.

Another way to express this is with the Burroughs/Gysin metaphor of The Third Mind. When any two people communicate, there is a third mind which is the sum and synergy of the interaction. You can attempt to understand these entities on the level of the individual mind - or from the perspective of the third (or fourth, fifth, etc...) mind.

I'd also add that tools such as Simple Evocation, as described in the excerpt, are very useful tools for re-aligning aspects of the self prior to taking your work to the transpersonal level.

If this really interests you, check out the book. Atem offers experiences rather than arguments. It's tough to jam these ideas into a thread here - and they make so much more sense as something you do rather than as explanation. It's sort of like explaining a joke or describing good sex to Republicans.

When i piece together the yesterday

today and tomorrow, of the journey , my mytho-poetic magickal journey RAW's words still fresh in my mind i see it all in terms of a narrative, of personal experince, that is part of a greater experience.It's like if i tried to explain to you how i experienced the poem 'Drunken Boat' by Arthur Rimbaud the first time i read it. I can see myself finding a copy of Moon Child in the used book store, i can see myself opening the cover of that used paper back and begin reading the story.Years later after reading Cosmic Trigger, i said if i meet those people i would like to join.About three months later some strange character with a t-shirt that said OTO on it was hanging outside of the Deli store my girl friend and i worked in.I later asked this guy about his T-shirt, and he said my girl friend and i could get initiated into the OTO that was in Oakland on San Pablo Ave.So we took a bus up to see the Caliph, my soul mate and i, and some months later, we moved to Berkeley and soon were initiated at the grand lodge.We in a year became a priest and priestess team and the whole scene was going through the changes that were going on at that time, the shifts and circles within circles, the ritual and the politics, the ego power trips and the moments of psychic transformation.

See, this as the first paragraph, as the attempt to understand what happened in those three years we were members of the OTO, as some recognition of the events that seemed to be connected to my pervious psychic experiences and what seemed to lead my mate and me to the door step of Grady MacMurphy, and that day he sat there and filled up his hash pipe and told some stories about how he met Aleister Crowley, in the months and years that followed a lot of experience was cramed into that moment, the three years we were connected to the grand lodge seems like three centuries, or three shakes of a lambs tail.

That day my wife and i got on a grayhound bus to go up to Oakland, we had been drinking wine the night before in a cafe, i had a bit of a hangover, i recall she was writing in her magickal diary, she could have been a poet too, but i was the crazy poet, she was writing, the line went,"birdshit boots fly me to the moon" that made us laugh all the way to San Francisco.How psychic was that line of flippant poetry, as Grady had on old army boots. We had to meet Gypsy Death the ex-biker pimp to tell us how to find Grady's old house on San Pablo Ave., we went up some stairs in a Tenderlion Apt. and went into a tiny room, that had Thoth Deck cards stuck on the filthy wall, Gypsy Death was this very strange character's name, and he had some young wild eyed girl there with him, that was a runaway that he was pimping on the street.Strange beginning to our OTO journey indeed, GD introduced us to a dude with a spiked collar around his neck that he called Bulldog, told us that Bulldog would escort us to the Grand Lodge.Thus we were about to enter the wild wooly murky magickal world of the Caliphate Ordo Templi Orientis.Birdshit boots flying us to the moon.

Mr. Crowley

was an intelligent prick that liked to to stick his cock into anything fleshy while under the influence of whatever substance could bend him a bit this way or that. He was pretty smart though, and although technically not a chaos majishun due to his golden dawn origin.

Dear Mr. Crowley

notice that nobody likes my story, or wants to hear anymore, and yet people are into magick, and sell books that distance themselves from this, however we cover it, or flip it around, and add nice neat words like Neuro-Linguistic-Programing or Kaos or Chaos Magick

or majik, or sigil shmidgal, or scientology, or computer-shamanic-chaos, or chaos poet, call it what you very well please.

When i was just getting into it, like i said, it just happened, i had nobody to tell me about Crowley this or Crowley that, or to put on some act like they knew where it was at, or wasn't at, or write nice neato books about this or that magick or hocus pocus, or weirdos that thought if they knew some rituals they could mess with your mind, heck my mind already was mess with, i just was trying to un mess it, if you get my drift, and don't give me short shrift.

I remember reading a book called Real Magic, by Isaac Bonewits, this was before i knew anything about RAW or AC, i was just into Surrealism, but that book got me thinking, years later i met Isaac, he came to a Gnostic Mass we did, and he was in one of the rites of the First Batch of the Rites of Eleusis, I remember him putting down The Book of The Law, and making fun of it, i also recall lots and lots of people that were attempting to decipher it.

I remember people calling people Crowleyites, and some were like very gung ho, lots of Pagans and assorted Witch coven people, I remember the Head of the Temple of Set coming over to the grand lodge one day with his VampQueen lady, and attempting to tell Grady that the OTO should let the Temple of Set take it over, I would have liked to learn more about Magick itself, but the owner of the OTO was like an ex-physics professor, and his classes were BORING!!! and he was into Enochian, but he was so coveting.Oh so much happened in three years, and later when i ran into the 11th degree on Haight Street.And we went to the funeral of the Lady that put on The Rites of Eleusis.How many of them are gone now?

i guess Crowley is a lot of things to a lot of people, i did learn some things while i hung out at the grand lodge, i got to do filing in a big file cabinet at the lodge(an old victorian type house), i read all sorts of letters that people sent from all around the world, velly intellesting...BUT YOU SCREWED IT UP!!!

OH I AM THE HEART AND THE SNAKE IS INTWINED!...AUMN.

When i got my first iMac, i was communicating with this lady that was really into Jack Parsons, for a short time, she really believed! She prolly thought she knew just what Jack and Crowley were all about, and would rise high high high in the order.HER web site was called Babalon after the Babalon Working.

...and ufo's in the desert and some green-eyed Venus walks out of the portal that Jack made.

 

I like Uncle Al

Most of the "schools" of magick trace the lineage of their techniques back to Crowley. That includes chaos magic and that includes Meta-Magick. Crowley was likely an infuence on NLP via Richard Bandler who was also a big fan of RAW - tho more obviously, NLP descends from General Semantics, Chomsky's theories on grammar, and the work of, for instance, Milton Erickson and Virginia Satir.

And magick changes and grows. Thelemic magick was not Golden Dawn magick, however much they shared roots, and chaos magic is not Thelemic, no matter how much one emerged from the other. We do need those words so we know what we're talking about.

Although he never explicitly describes it in his writings, I think Crowley had managed to isolate the basic of structure of rituals, the shape of the ritual that made it work, that made it a ritual. You can see this in his usage of similar ritual structures in, for example, Liber Samekh as in the various pentagram and hexagram rituals. He both elaborates on and strips down this basic structure in a few different ways in creating, say, the Star Ruby or Star Sapphire. Meta-Magick is more an attempt to describe that skill - the ability to isolate useful structures of ritual - than to teach symbol sets, which is what Golden Dawn and many other systems tend to spend more time on. There is use for both structure and content, of course. I suspect Uncle Al would have appreciated the balance.

Being in New York, I never met McMurtry, tho I do know a few of the current OTO officers and count one or two of them among my friends... and from my own experience, meeting Thelemites does generate interesting stories (whether they are wearing a 93 on their forehead or not).

93 is on my head

but it is invisible, so there is so much i don't know, but thanks for the reply, really, it makes a lot more clear, my understanding of ritual,my wife and i did plenty Gnostic masses at Grady's house, (grand lodge), was basic, it was intuitive, i did do the lesser pentagram all the frickin time, the star ruby too, i liked invoking Liber Samekh(the invocation alone), and did Sex Magick with my mate, but other then the Rites of Eleusis, which was the grandmother of all the stuff we did when we were still in the order i did not do any Enochian or other very elaborate rituals.When we did the first Rites one of the people that put it on, the guy living with the woman that put them on at her house, he made the sigils for each planet.So my knowledge of the structure and shape of the ritual as you explain it, was not, or did not have the space or time to develope.I was merely attempting to deal with the strange goings on the politics and the current changes that were happening in and around the order.And this i could write a book about if i had the nerve.And i am glad that people like you Philip, are doing the work of keeping the magick alive and moving out of that whole atmosphere of grand mucky mucks, that some people object to the whole Masonic conspiracy thang, this and that, and now that all you hear of is Grail this and Holy that, and books written about Templar's secret treasure yatta yatta everybody wants to get into the act.

 

Creation Spirituality

With respects to the (meta-magickal) ritual conversation, ...

... I like the Matthew Fox Creation Spirituality approach:  Since the spirit is alive within you, you can roll your own!  Mix tradition and new ways, and divine from the heart.