Support our Kickstarter

RS in the Grey Lady

2012 Book Coverlp.jpg

Reality Sandwich has reached a noteworthy milestone -- our new anthology has been reviewed by The New York Times.  In fact, rather than appearing as one of over two dozen books in the Sunday book section, Dwight Garner's review of Toward 2012: Perspectives on the Next Age received a highly coveted spot in the Friday's "Arts" section.

As for the review itself, its approach is reflected in the tongue-in-cheek headline, "The End Is Near! Now the Good News: It Could Be Groovy." Garner treats the anthology with a mixture of appreciation, curiousity and contempt. It's a wonderfully befuddled critique. On the one hand, he is clearly drawn to the book, calling it "one-stop shopping for anyone interested in the vanguard of New Age thought." A sub-headline in the print version of the review describes Toward 2012 as "A New Age take on what ails the world and how to fix it." We'd kindly despute the term "New Age," but the rest is okay by us.

However, as Garner dips into the more mystical, transcendent, and consciousness-flavored pieces in the anthology, his dour skepticism seems to get the best of him. He refers to some of our favorite articles as "patchouli-scented and divinely inane; they’ll tempt you to set your yoga mat on fire and permanently avoid certain aisles at Whole Foods." Come on. Have you even tried to set fire to a yoga mat? They don't burn easily. 

The mixed review reminds us of Andy Warhol's advice about publicity: "I don't read my press. I weigh it." With the Times article now spiralling out across the web and appearing in papers like the International Herald Tribune and even The Jakarta Globe, our growing transformational community is racking up some serious media poundage in our effort to evolve consciousness bite by bite.

At the same time, Toward 2012 has given the RS crew ample opportunity to speak directly to large audiences at bookstores across the country, and through the media, as well.

Comments

Surprised at the lack of coherence...

Overall it's a good broad selection, but I can easily see where lots of people would be disappointed. Specifically one of the first articles, "Homo Luminus: You With Wings," was a stereotypical new age fluffy piece. It may have sparked the imagination of people like us, but average people are going get nothing but contempt from this. I took it as ok, but it didn't bring me to a greater understanding or spark deeper self questioning. Similarly I thought ST's piece about Casteneda's legacy was just whining about details, while not even giving a brief idea of his take on Castenada's philosophy and what it means. And of course there was only John Major Jenkins' article from his book in 1998 that tried to deal with what might happen on 2012. This makes it look like there's been no one formulating a comprehensive theory of it, from personal philosophy to collective enlightenment - and maybe there isn't. Well, maybe that's the point, that no body knows, everything is uncertain and all over the place, but we can at least describe our descent into chaos can't we? The one author that stands out as having that capability is Paul Levey who wrote "The Wounded Healer" article. It describes nicely what's going on now, but how are things changing, what is the final healing moment like on 11:11 12/21/2012? That's what's needed.

Great Review

I saw this a few weeks ago - RS comes out of the encounter pretty well I think. It kicks ass that some of the contributors here are suddenly being read (about) by the mainstream community. That's hugely positive in my view - gaps are opened in the window, oxygen seeps in, and readers realise that regardless of the economic depression some folk are dancing onwards...

 

I've resolved to trash my secular music collection more than once after stumbling into ecstatic experiences. And stumbling into these experiences is something humans continue to do, regardless of the prevailing models. Allegri's Misere has been my only sustenace for many a week....

 

I hope the reviewer gets to know the resolute astonishment of that feeling at least once in his lifetime - afterall, he can always download his faves again, when the ecstatic illumination fades away and the smoking ruins of his ipod have cooled...


In wildness is the preservation of the world - Thoreau

Just curious

What do you mean by "trashing my secular music collection" ?

 

Congratulations, and whoah..  I just realised on that website (nytimes) if you select some text there's a popup icon and if you click it, you get the description of the highlited word. I just learned a new english word today "sprightly" hahah (french native).

In any case, no press is bad press.

Perhaps if then people start seeing little evolutionary groups popping up all over the place(evolver.net!?!?!?) then it will show them how down to earth things really are.

 

 

 

Black Light in the Attic Podcast

http://blacklightattic.podomatic.com

Normalizing function

The job of the mass media is like the playground bully-- to keep everyone in line with social norms. So I'm not surprised by the snarky tone of the review, which is the only tone the educated class can use when dealing with anything heavy or serious anymore.

 

Author of Mediacology: http://mediacology.com/the-book/

Quan Duc

silly review

got my copy and look forward to reading it. I loved the first 2012 by Pinchbeck. Please come to Santa FE, NM and talk to us. We are very "woo woo" around here and I mean that in a cosmic giggle kinda way. :)

burning secular music

The "burning my secular music collection" quote was taken out of context. During an Ayahuasca ceremony, while I was being cleaned out and healed from years of fundamentalist Christianity, I revisited flashbacks of myself burning my secular music collection in the name of Christian faith. Ayahuasca showed me how judgmental I was during my days as a Christian, which is what the piece is about, in the simplest terms. The author of the New York Times piece clearly didn't take the time to actually read my essay, which was disappointing for me, but it's alright. I think it will reach whoever might find it helpful! Adam Elenbaas

Please don't call me 'New Age'

It's true that I have gotten some 'contempt,' derision, and, more politely, raised eyebrows from a few people in response to 'You with Wings,' but that hasn't been the majority. Most people take the article for what it was: A chronicle of an experience and an exploration of personal meaning. Many tell me about similar experiences.

The fact is we have all had experiences that transgress the logical framework with which we collectively limn ourselves. I hope the article calls that framework into question. Isn't that what Reality Sandwich is all about?

First they ignore, then ridicule, and then.....

Reminds me of the old Gandhi line: First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."

I wonder if we all should be clinking our consciousness-raising champagne glasses, having just reached stage 2.  Cheers to all of you.  

Now, I guess we look forward to stage three, although I'm hoping we can switch out "fight" with an "all night dance party." It'd be a more fun and civilized way to go about it.

NYT RIP - Love the Cover!

Haven't had the opportunity to really absorb the RS Book, but I must say that the cover mesmerizes. Unlike the NYT humanist position that the universe is unintelligent and man must fight against the savageness of the earth and the heavens by utilizing and devloping technologies, the cover points to a new understanding awakening in us that the universe is indeed THE INTELLIGENCE - all of us patterns shimmering around the Source.