The Eight-Circuit Brain

brain8big.jpg

The following is an excerpt from The Eight-Circuit Brain: Navigational Strategies for the Energetic Body, forthcoming from Vertical Pool Publishing.

 

"We soared, we crashed, we burnt out, we're tuning back in."

We are all walking through the pages of our own stories every day, stories that intersect the stories of others, dead and alive, as chapters in the larger Book of Life. If you are friends with writers, your story will probably end up in their writings or in their books some day, whether you like it or not. Even if you have never met the author of a book or read the book itself, your story is probably already captured. This happens all the time. And no matter how much certain authors write from their own personal experience, they cannot help but also reveal the greater truths innate to the collective milieu we are all expressions of. Some of these writers seem to have built-in broadband antennae for picking up those signals and decoding them for the rest of us; Timothy Leary was one of these big antennae writers.

Large collective shifts have ways of grabbing our personal lives by the scruff of the neck and tossing us about as if we were plastic action figure replicas of ourselves. Sometimes these greater forces erupt from deep within our own genetic makeup and shock us with diseases unexpectedly inherited from our ancestors. Other times, we get lucky and the chaos gods of the zeitgeist decide it's our turn to win the lottery. Or when Aphrodite Love comes to town and turns our lives upside down in the name of Polymorphous Rapture.

These "outside shocks" can be humbling to any naive ego still in denial of the objective truths (and shocks) of Ecstasy, Uncertainty, Indivisibility and Impermanence. Thanks to Dr. Leary's Eight-Circuit Brain model, I learned to see these shocks as activation points for what he calls fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth circuits, respectively. As it turns out, we all have antennas to pick up the big signals. We only have to learn how to unwrap them from ourselves, our self-absorption, and point them outwards again.

In video-blogger Brian Shields' interview with Lisa Ferguson (2/8/2009 at the Timothy Leary reunion party, 111 Minna gallery in S.F.), she shares a startling message from Leary himself, spoken to her personally three days before his death. "We were right," he told her, "all the ideas and dreams we had back then, we were right. It's time to tune back in." Lisa took his message to heart as a boost to complete her documentary film, "Children of the Revolution." Inspired by her own Millbrook childhood stories where her baby sitters were none other than Tim Leary, Ralph Metzner and Richard Alpert (Ram Dass), the film also features interviews with other sixties luminaries and what they are tuning into today. Watch for it!

Those who were not alive to witness or participate in the sixties cultural revolution first hand may feel a sense of having missed out on something important and/or harbor the more cynical belief that the world is worse off thanks to Baby Boomer's self-indulgent delusions of entitlement that got us into the mess we're in today. As with many polarized views, the truth often lies somewhere in between. It is now well documented that the American media and government created and maintained the illusion that the sixties were a failed experiment in drug abuse, sexual debauchery, and impossible utopian ideals. And in one sense they were right. Literally millions of participants in this cultural experiment soared, crashed, burnt out, and lost all perspective by pursuing overly inflated, narcissistic visions of changing the world with more peace, love, sex, and LSD.

I can only assume that most utopian visions fail from apathy due to a lack of the consistent self-discipline necessary to embody the vision and "become the change we want to see in the world." Any full-blown spiritual event, with or without LSD, can naturally expose the futility and the illusion of ego. In a naive attempt to preserve spiritual revelation, many ego-trashing dogmas have been created. Taken to heart, any anti-ego hippie belief can easily lead to a "why bother?" apathy masked by a "just mellow out and go with the flow" fatalism. As it turns out, a strong, flexible ego is necessary to manifest our innermost dreams in the external world at large. Any attempt to hold onto a dream, without the self-work to embody it, keeps that dream alive in the mind alone. And in the sixties, LSD opened up millions of minds and more specifically, millions of third eyes (sixth circuit). This powerful cultural and psychic event also catalyzed equally potent somatic, body-centered experiences through the sixties' sexual revolution. LSD can also make us very horny.

The sixties were not a failed experiment. The sixties wrote the first chapter in an ongoing book of how culture transforms itself starting at the level of the individual. In this chapter, an all-encompassing epiphany of self-awareness explodes in the brain and exposes the nature of reality itself. This event can easily overwhelm the existing means to contextualize and apply this knowledge, especially if we are spiritually starved and cannot stop eating fruit from the tree of cosmic knowledge. We eat, we rest, we talk and dream of future societies, and then we eat some more and talk some more. The more forbidden fruit we eat, the more our minds expand and enflame the search for what it all means, ad infinitum and ad nauseum.

"Existence itself may be considered an abyss possessed of no meaning. I do not read this as a pessimistic statement but a declaration of autonomy for my imagination & will and their most beautiful act of bestowing meaning upon existence itself." -- Hakim Bey

The use of LSD and other psychoactive agents not only shocks the ego with exposure to the void but also shocks the very core of our being with a direct experience of void as true nature, who we are at essence, a stunning revelation brought to collective consciousness centuries ago by Gautama Buddha (and given collective context through the creation of various schools of Buddhist meditation practice, doctrine and dogma. I think of Timothy Leary as a Buddha or, as he might prefer to be called, an MVP (Most Valuable Philosopher) of the 20th Century. And like other great philosophers before him, it's reasonable to assume that his seminal contribution may take forty or fifty years to find a collective and cultural context.

Even though Leary indirectly turned millions of people on to LSD, that phenomenon was clearly beyond his control. It was not his central contribution. His seminal offering persists as his Eight-Circuit Brain model for Intelligence Increase, a user-friendly grid designed for anyone exploring higher consciousness as a means not merely to get high, but for designing and creating new contexts for their lives. At the heart of the Eight-Circuit Brain model we find the two most important questions any self-aware person can ask: 1) What is intelligence?, and 2) According to your definition, how would you increase this intelligence?

I first encountered Leary's Eight-Circuit Brain model in Bob Wilson's ground-breaking book, Cosmic Trigger. Leary's grid struck me with awesome potential. Here was a way of redefining "intelligence" through eight different yet related modalities that -- when fully absorbed, integrated and transmitted -- could possibly increase one's intelligence as eight brains in a neurological clusterfuck of Eternal Humming Delight. My twenty-seven year old mind was set ablaze as the seed was planted for writing my first book, Angel Tech.

Berkeley, California 1979-82: During one of Robert Anton Wilson's many Discordian Salons, I shared with him my passion for Leary's circuit system. I told him I'd like to write a book about it and apply my background in theatre to create rituals to help activate these "circuits" for the reader. Bob laughed and said it was a great idea. He then proceeded to tell me that he was writing a book along similar lines called Prometheus Rising, and that it might be the most important book he had written so far. I sat there dumbfounded as Bob's gaze shifted towards his good friend, Greg Hill (author of Principia Discordia) who winked back at him. The Famous Published Author was writing his next masterpiece while an unknown theatre rat was in the wings scribbling notes for his, as of yet, unwritten and unpublished first book. A confusion of emotions. How could I feel so damn self-important and utterly insignificant at the same time? Operation mindfuck was in full swing.

I went home that night and started reading Leary's book, Exo-Psychology. About seventy pages in, Circuit 3 intellect stuttered and choked before it finally shut down. Information overdose. So many theories, so little application. If I can't apply knowledge in some way, it feels useless to me. For all of Leary's brilliance and innovation, I was annoyed by what felt like a serious imbalance between theory and praxis. I asked Bob about this and he said "people might understand Tim better if they knew his nickname during his Harvard days: Theory Leary; he had reams and reams of them." I decided that Angel Tech had to include numerous ways to substantiate a more direct experience of what the "circuits" symbolized. Direct experience trumps the armchair philosophy of abstract rationalizations. The Dogma of Direct Experience. I found my new dogma, though I didn't know it was a dogma back then. Dogmas can be like that.

Four years later, Prometheus Rising is published. Bob's encyclopedic funhouse genius advances Leary's theories by linking them to a web of isomorphic systems, memes, and paradigms like Quantum Mechanics, B.F. Skinner's Behaviorism, Korzybski's Semantics, Sarfatti's Superluminal Physics, Alan Watts' Zen, Freud, Rattray Taylor's Patrist/Matrist Sociology, and Toffler's Third Wave. Bob also broke the Theory Leary Barrier by slyly inserting a series of tasks, word games, exercises and meditations aimed at triggering a more direct experience of the sources of intelligence inferred by the Eight-Circuit Brain model. In this book, Bob advances Leary's theories for the postmodern Western central nervous system. This breakthrough also meant that in writing Angel Tech, I had to carry the ball further into terra incognito and descend deeper and deeper into the flesh and blood embodiment of these ideas.

Though Timothy Leary is publicly credited with the creation of the Eight-Circuit Brain model, he actually did not originate it but popularized his own updated version of an ancient Eastern spiritual code and practice. In the preface of his 1976 book, What Does Woman Want?, Dr. Leary explains how "Dr. Adams," a Hindu scholar from Rutgers University, arrived at his Millbrook estate in the early sixties and initiated him to an esoteric practice of the Hindu Chakra System. Dr. Leary fully absorbed and assimilated this new teaching by replacing "chakra" with the modern term "circuit" and adding Western scientific terms plus recent breakthroughs in Genetics and Quantum Physics towards the transmission of his opus, Exo-Psychology (Starseed Press; updated to Info-Psychology, New Falcon).

The ancient yoga of the Hindu Chakra system aims at trans-substantiating consciousness through the energy centers of the body's spinal column and brain. From the coarsest, densest, and slowest vibrational frequencies of the Muladhara root chakra (the coccyx) to the most refined, subtle and fastest vibrations of the Sahasrara crown chakra (the skullcap), a vertical pathway has been thoroughly and meticulously mapped out centuries ago infusing a priori status on the crown chakra as a final resting place for "The Enlightened." Over years of meditation and yoga practice, the yogi learns to ignite the fiery kundalini coiled in the root chakra. When activated, its white-hot liquid fire pulses and hisses its way up the spinal column, blissfully burning through each chakra on its serpentine pathway toward the crown where it explodes into a "thousand-petalled lotus," a luminous fountain of cosmic consciousness, establishing spiritual Guru status for the aspiring yogi.

This distinctly Eastern process of trans-substantiation moves consciousness beyond the finite domain of the physical body toward communion with The Infinite, an act that sanctions a disembodied spirituality in many Guru/Sunyasin traditions. The Guru's expansive presence magnetizes scores of sunyasins, or devotees, who act as his "anchors" in the material world to assist the business of daily survival and to act as vessels for his vision, message, and spiritual presence. A deeply symbiotic bond develops as a mutually embraced dependency; the guru needs disciples as much as the disciples need the guru. Examples include Da Free John, Rajneesh (Osho), Muktananda, Maharaji Ji and many others.

Far from these Eastern religious traditions of trans-substantiation, western classical mythology points to the wily Titan Prometheus who steals fire from the chief god Zeus and gives it away to mortals for their personal use. This "stealing fire from the gods" story also appears in Native American tribal dreams and myths. According to the Cherokees, when Possum and Buzzard failed to steal fire, Grandmother Spider used her web to steal the fire, hiding it in a clay pot. Fire was also stolen and given to humans by Coyote, Beaver, or Dog. To the Creek Indians, Rabbit stole fire from the Weasels. Timothy Leary embodied this promethean mythos by stealing the fire from the Eastern gods and passing it onto the more materialistic and rebellious Western mind.

Beside updating archaic terms to postmodern sciences and terminologies, Leary introduced a significant breakthrough that bridged the Eastern bias of trans-substantiation to the Western substantiation bias, or materialization, of energies. He did this by basing his definition of intelligence on the biological model of the neuron. As the most basic unit of biological intelligence, the neuron functions by absorbing signals, storing or integrating them, and transmitting the results. He suggested that each of the eight functions of intelligence, symbolized by the Eight-Circuit Brain, could only be fully experienced through their absorption, integration, and transmission, and on their own terms.

He also suggested that intelligence would remain latent or repressed to the degree that we were unable or unwilling to fully absorb, integrate, and transmit it. This implies that simply absorbing data or experience alone cannot advance intelligence. Or put another way, who will know how intelligent we really are until we have integrated our experiences enough to express, share, and articulate them? If we apply this tertiary principle -- of Absorb, Integrate and Transmit -- to all eight functions of this model, the implications are staggering.

If all perceptions are gambles, as Bob suggests, the Eight-Circuit Brain model remains one of the most eloquent and thrilling ways to play the cards I've been dealt. Bob also used to say, "The future is up for grabs. It's too late for anything but Magick." I think the future has already happened. The future is now. Spread the word. Prometheus has risen. Life itself is the guru.

 

The Four Survival Circuits: Their Fixations and Anchors

Each of the first four "survival circuits" are driven by variations on the primary will to survive. Fixations refer to any concentration and investment of consciousness in specific events and experiences that activate a given circuit. Fixation also demonstrates how consciousness can become fixed, or "stuck," in one circuit over another by overemphasis. Anchors refer to how we know a circuit has been earned and integrated and is ready to serve as a stabilizing influence, or anchor, for absorbing and integrating the shock from its higher overtone function (1 & 5, 2 & 6, 3 & 7, 4 & 8; more on this later).

C-1 Physio-Biological Intelligence; the will to survive fixations: food, shelter, self-preservation, material goods, safety and security.

Anchor: degree of confidence earned and maintained to assure physical survival.

C-2 Emotional-Territorial Intelligence; the will to power fixations: self-defense, territoriality, status, ego-strength, emotional honesty.

Anchor: degree of emotional confidence earned and maintained to assure personal worth.

C-3 Symbolic-Conceptual Intelligence; the will to sanity fixations: thinking, problem solving, analysis, semantics, system theories.

Anchor: degree of mental confidence earned and maintained to assure peace of mind.

C-4 Social-Moral Intelligence; the will to socialize fixations: friendship, domestication, sexual rites and tribal identity, ethical codes, religions.

Anchor: degree of social confidence earned and maintained to assure sense of belonging.

 

The Four Post-Survival Circuits: Their Catalysts and Shocks

Catalysts refer to whatever triggers and stimulates the specific energy, or current, innate to a given circuit. Shocks refer to the specific impact these currents and energies have to stimulate growth and evolution in their corresponding survival circuits, i.e., 5 & 1, 6 & 2, 7 & 3, and 8 & 4.

C-5 Somatic Intelligence of Body Wisdom and Five Senses

Catalysts: whatever triggers the experience of rapture, communion with nature, tantra (yoga, meditation, ritual), charisma, second wind, falling in love (endorphins) and the expanding presence of being here now.

The Shocks of Ecstasy and Bliss (absence of suffering).

C-6 Intuitive-Psychic Intelligence of the Brain, Spine, & CNS.

Catalysts: whatever triggers the experience of the energetic body or aura, the second attention, intuition, clairvoyance and other psychic abilities, ritual magick, reality selection, direct perception of a relative nature of reality.

The Shocks of Uncertainty and Freedom (absence of falsely assumed certitudes and dogmas).

C-7 Mytho-Poetic Genetic Intelligence of DNA and the Planetary Entity.

Catalysts: whatever triggers the experience of ancestral and past life memories, autonomous archetypes, synchronicity, planetary (Gaia) mind, cosmic consciousness.

The Shocks of Indivisibility and Cosmic Unity (absence of dualistic consciousness).

C-8 Quantum-Nonlocal Intelligence of Subatomic interactions.

Catalysts: whatever triggers near death experience, out of body experiences, the dreambody/dreamtime continuum, communion with Void and the mysterious singularity at the heart of subatomic activity.

The Shocks of Death and Impermanence (absence of ego-identification and release from physical body).

 

The Three Sub-Phases: How Intelligence Can Be Increased

These eight functions of intelligence can be accessed through any experience allowing for the full absorption, integration, and transmission of each level. These three sub-phases reflect the functioning of our most basic biological unit of intelligence: the neuron (alternative terms: receive/digest/eliminate, experience/process/communicate, study/interpret/articulate). All three stages are necessary for the advancement of intelligence. If you only absorb, nothing is integrated; if nothing can be integrated, we regurgitate and parrot whatever we are absorbing. Each of the eight levels expresses distinct ways in which this three-stage process can occur, ways that do not necessarily apply to other levels. For example, C-2 emotions do not follow the same "logic" as C-3 ideas and vice versa.

 

The Verticality Factor

Each of the eight functions exists within each individual at various degrees of expression and latency. They can be viewed and approached in a linear sequential "evolutionary" way and/or in a nonlinear "radial" way; both vantages carry their own values. I think it would be erroneous to assume any one circuit to be "better" or "worse," or "higher" or "lower" than any other, if they symbolize simultaneously existing states of consciousness working together as a dynamic changing whole. To view them hierarchically, by positing any circuit as superior or inferior to any other only perpetuates "the emotional plague," a term proposed by Wilhelm Reich for the psychological syndrome marked by irrational insistence on beliefs and ideas that depend on dissociation of mind from body. Reich also referred to it as "the neurotic character in destructive action on the social scene."

Though there are countless ways these eight functions interact and/or act on each other, the area I have found most interesting so far addresses how the first four "survival" circuits and the second four "post-survival" circuits act on each other in very precise two-way vertical connectivities. I specifically refer to how the upper circuits act on the lower circuits as distinct shocks and how the lower circuits act on the upper circuits as stabilizing anchor points, or the absorption and integration of those shocks.

 

The Vertical Connectivities: 1/5; 2/6; 3/7; 4/8

Without a supple and resilient foundation (circuits 1-4 integrated), any significant force of expanded consciousness (circuits 5-8) can leave us destabilized at varying degrees of personality disintegration. Once the survival circuits can be more fully experienced, integrated and embodied, they can also better serve to (re)stabilize the personality to better absorb and integrate the shocks delivered by any activation of the post-survival circuits.

Upper circuit post-survival shocks stimulate growth and development in the four survival circuits, just as the survival circuits (once integrated) can help substantiate the more ephemeral and subtle states symbolized by circuits five through eight. If monitored and tended to, all eight circuits can be made to work together in more meaningful ways to serve the dynamic changing whole they are expressions of. By tending to the specific verticalities shared between upper circuit shocks and lower circuit anchors (1/5; 2/6; 3/7; 4/8), the Eight-Circuit Brain model can offer safer and more creative guidelines to the high seas adventures of consciousness research.

The Nature and Function of "Shock"

How we respond to real life shocks often determines the degree our experience turns negative or positive, painful or joyous, destructive or creative, good or bad. Is it possible that shocks are neither bad nor good by nature, but neutral? To assume that shocks are not neutral but always negative or positive suggests that the universe is either out to get us and burn us -- the negatively inflated paranoid bias -- or that the universe is out to bless us -- the positively inflated messianic bias. I think both biases express self-delusion. If we value a choice-centered life of increasing autonomy and self-responsibility, how we respond to shock may have more lasting value than any initial shock itself. Here, responsibility is revisioned as our response-ability, our ability to respond.

In context to the Eight-Circuit model, shocks are only "shocking" to the degree of our naïveté around the objective truths of ECSTACY, UNCERTAINTY, INDIVISIBILITY and IMPERMANENCE (corresponding to circuit five through eight, respectively). Ecstasy expresses our most natural state of being when unburdened by over-identification with the anxiety, guilt, and suffering resulting from unsolved survival problems (circuits 1-4). Uncertainty refers to the truly unpredictable nature of life, of not knowing what will happen next, as a liberating and highly creative state. Indivisibility expresses the dissolution of arbitrary divisions revealing the basic unity of all life forms. Impermanence means all things pass; everything once alive eventually dies.

"Inability to accept the mystic experience is more than an intellectual handicap. The lack of awareness of the basic unity of organism and environment is a serious and dangerous hallucination." -- Alan Watts

Real life shocks can happen anywhere, anytime and to anybody; nobody is exempt. Examples: sudden housing eviction, getting fired from work, marriage, divorce, childbirth, parenthood, loss of loved ones, natural disasters, sudden kundalini activations, death of parents, death of children, falling in love, unexpected financial windfalls, terrorist attacks, any move of residence, police arrest, incarceration, big employment promotions, social betrayals, family disintegrations, automobile accidents, hospitalization, surgery, spiritual epiphanies, cardiac arrests, strokes, epistemological crisis, heroic doses of magic mushrooms; the list goes on & on & on...

Shocks act as turning points for Self-initiation, of engaging the separatist ego in a confrontation with the archetype of the Self. And, as Swiss psychiatrist Carl G. Jung suggests, "The experience of the Self is almost always a defeat for the ego." As more outside shocks are absorbed and integrated, we become initiated as human shock absorbers transmitting initiatic shock to others. We become as initiates, men and women of power; if that is what we want. Some of us undergo this Self-initiation process instinctively without any conscious plan or knowledge, while others approach it on purpose; either way, when outside shocks are absorbed and integrated, we are transformed by the transmission of their presence to the world.

 

Shock as a Creative State

Shocks come in basically two forms: inside and outside. Inside shocks are shocks we can administer ourselves. For example. By choosing to intentionally inconvenience ourselves amid daily activities, we can administer small shocks to our habitual routines by going against the grain of habit and altering the expected. Any way we are able to shock ourselves constitutes an "inside shock." However, there is only so much we can do by our own efforts alone. Armenian philosopher G.I. Gurdjieff called "outside shocks" those event arriving from any place beyond our personal control and comprehension (see examples given earlier).

Outside shocks tend to be far more effective in transforming and shaking things up than any self-created inside shock. Implementing inside shocks can, however, encourage enough flexibility to help us navigate and manage the greater forces of outside shocks when they arrive. Any state of shock naturally manifests some kind of an internal emergency state where, as a survival reflex, our senses open up to get more information. This escalation of awareness can also occur on small scales such as whenever we become emotionally upset, or lose our physical balance and fall, or are mentally thrown into bewilderment.

In these instances the ego wobbles as our awareness of uncertainty increases. We experience ourselves as more fluid, volatile and unstable. In this marginal state, we may be more open to taking on new directives and values. If the new direction takes and holds, it can be maintained with applied effort and a supportive environment. It can be strengthened by a series of challenges designed to test the integrity of our new patterns. In this way, the state of shock can initiate a creative state and, given the commitment and will of the individual, a sixth circuit process that John C. Lilly coined as "metaprogramming."

 

Image by exper, courtesy of Creative Commons license.

Comments

YEAH!

Propaganda Anonymous

Antero, so great to see your writing on RS!

The 8-Circuit Model of Intelligence,or as RAW called it in his later yearsThe Circuit System of Intelligencebased on his knowledge of neurological-somaticfeedback loops, Is a real contribution to Evolutionary Psychology, IMHO.

It is a great model and totally inspiring when thinking about Consciousness.

And not knocking the great Ken Wilbur hereLeary developed this model before Wilbur's "Spectrum of Consciousness" (a great book!)and before soooo many of the models and muddles abundantly filling bookshelves today

Leary was a pioneer

Bob Wilson a true philosopher of scienceand

Antero RAWKS!

PEACE

8 Circuit Brain

I was very happy to see this article as I'm currently reading Prometheus Rising. I think the 8-Circuit Model gives a really good perspective of how we function, we are indeed domesticated primates and often behave in robotic and unhelpful ways.

I love the notion that we can re-programme ourself and become less a slave of our conditioning, and I think the higher circuits give an inspiring view of our own potential as human beings.

I think the model also relates nicely to Guirdieff's work, as if by being able to step back and observe our unconsious behavior we are automatically more free from it.

Many Thanks Antero Alli.

Here's a great quote from Leary:

"Our brains are still learning to exhale as well as inhale in the datasphere. Of course, not all humans will make this move (into the future). Many of our finny ancestors preferred to remain marine forms. Many humans will be trapped by gene-pool geography. However, every stage of history has produced names and heroic legends for the strong, stubborn, creative individuals, who explore some future frontier, collect and bring back new information, and offer to guide the human gene pool to the next stage..." www.sniffcode.com

Escalating Shocks

I sit here and attempt to absorb and integrate this information.

 

I haven't worked much since last October and utilized the time to scan the world's information offerings. What I haven't done much of is integrate this information in what I'd perceive to be useful ways.

 

Like many, my path (story) has recently included loss of employment, loss of private housing and a variety of universe provided external shocks, such as having a deer suicide itself by leaping into my path, resulting in replacement of my vehicle.

 

Curiously, after digesting this article some, I have noted that part of my response has been to hibernate and slow down all aspects of physical stimulus, including less participation with folks and settling into a very dull and risk-less set of routines. What I am focused upon, and discerning, is the rate of external shocks feels to be escalating for the collective, based upon current economic environments. In observation, I note that these conditions are not feeling to be a neutral occurrence with it simply up to the participants to make the best of them and evolve. It feels more like orchestrated overload of the collective, yet by whom or for what specific purpose I am not resolved. Certainly an enormous swindle and wealth transfer has taken place, and continues, yet resting on this evaluation seems to only scratch the surface and there seems to be archetypal forces in play.

 

Within the coming weeks and months, I am sensing many veils will drop for our collective and that we each have an opportunity to hone ourselves and become more helpful for one another as we seek and provide compassion, as we become equalized in the same soup, or pot of boiling water as frogs, we may find some common ground in relation.

 

Namaste!

 

~ blessings of blissings ~

http://communityvisionblog.ning.com/

 

Therapy?

Does anyone know of any therapists using the 8-circuit model of consciousness? The only therapist I had was more concerned with "fixing" me (or telling me I was fine without actually trying to understand my psyche, and of course pushing the prozac) rather than seeing my case as a work in progress, as all humans are. I don't have any overload of mental qualms but we're all neurotic to some degree, and we all overcompensate our under-development in certain circuits for over-development in others. I would like to see if there are any therapists working on balancing these circuits, as Leary probably would have done in a psychological setting, with and without the help of LSD, if he wasn't the scapegoat for the government's many mistakes in the 60s.

Try this...

To Dust_23.

Here's a quote I lifted from somewhere: "All routes may lead self to self, though no route is any more valid than another and new routes may be created individually at any time with equal potential. Dabbling with many routes designed by others doesn't necessarily hold the answers and growth sought, though it often results in interesting experiences and distractions"

There are many map makers, such as Tim Leary, and there are many, many maps you could follow. But within your own psyche there is a kind of homing beacon leading to your own personal map making lab.

One way to tune in to that homing beacon is by using Stan Grof's NOSC brainchild. Check out this link:

http://holotropicbreathwork.ning.com/

I began this journey with a very inexpensive group Focus Breathwork session with better-than-expected results, which can be seen here:

http://www.realitysandwich.com/revisiting_quotrealms_human_unconsciousquot#comment-23806

Also, check out other's comments here:

http://www.tedriskin.com/hb/hbquotes.htm

Tap into your own well spring of intuition during a  Non Ordinary State of Consciousnes in a safe and professional set & setting. If at first you don't find anything keep digging! Even the dirt in your next shovel-full may hold some meaning...

 

intuition as sixth circuit attribute

To Leon Night ~ Your quote reminds me of another. "If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there." I see this as an optimistic outlook, one that permits enough uncertainty to remain open to the moment and enough perception to see beyond preconceptions and previous beliefs. As you suggest, tapping into this wellspring of intuition can pave its own authentic trajectory -- free from any system -- and from this, we can discover those images, words and maps innate to our own internal resonances. This process expresses very precisely someone whose sixth circuit has opened and who has found the emotional anchoring (C-2) to effectively navigate their lives, their energetic body, in the transformative post-2012 times to come.

Reminds me of

"A fool who persists in his folly eventually becomes wise" - Taoist wisdom via Alan Watts.

Personally, I strive to be as wise a fool as I can be! http://aonstation.blogspot.com/

William Blake

One of my fave quotes, "A fool who persists in his folly eventually becomes wise" is actually from visionary poet, WILLIAM BLAKE. I believe it's from his epic work, "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell"

Thanks!

Thanks for clearing that up! Watts used it during one of his talks entitled Intellectual Yoga that I love to listen to. Something very warm and mood lifting about his voice and manner. If anyone reading this likes his work I suggest hunting down recordings, though I'm not sure if they're available in digital format anywhere. There was a popular cassette for The Way of Zen circulating for years that is also excellent. Not nearly as much raw info as the book but so much more digestable and a real joy to listen to. Many thanks Antero, I'm making my way through your excellent book you sent me (via Tenth To The Moon).

http://aonstation.blogspot.com/

WATTS ON THE AIR

I was fortunate to be living in Berkeley all throughout the seventies and looked forward to hearing the weekly broadcasts of Watts talks over KPFA radio. What a voice, what a mind, what a heart!

Allan Watts recordings

In one of Allan Watts' books, he talks about 'aching legs Zen' as a kind of compulsive obsession with sitting meditation. I'm glad I read that after only five uncomfortable years, before any serious cramp had set in.

Funny how a single well-forged phrase can unhook a hang-up, and redirect an over-serious seeker.

Here are some Allan Watts recordings, animated by some of the South Park crew:

http://www.freshminds.com/animation/alan_watts_theater.html

2012

'...in the transformative post-2012 times to come.'

Seeing as you bring up the subject of 2012, I was wondering whether you expect something of note to happen on that date? Do you think we might reach a kind of critical mass in terms mastering the circuits?

earth surrender rites

I don't know what's going to happen on 2012. I think the best way to predict the future is to create it. If the recent cresting and collapsing of widespread global materialism and its reigning economic structures are any indication, I’d say the immaterial and objective force of the Earth has been amping up its frequencies. The world is burning and the planet is picking up speed.

If we really want the scoop, the frontline information, about what is actually going on, we have only to point our antennaes -- our C-6 intuition -- outwards to the Earth below and around us. Attuning to planetary energies brings us to the absorption phase of C-7 where the individual body/CNS links directly with the Earth as a primary source.

I do not refer to any Gaia concept of the living earth but to an enactment of an earth surrender rite for accelerating the absorption and circulation of the immaterial, objective force of the Earth throughout the instrument of your own body and CNS.

earth rites

'..an enactment of an earth surrender rite for accelerating the absorption and circulation of the immaterial, objective force of the Earth throughout the instrument of your own body and CNS.'

I must say this does appeal to me, and will try it.

I enjoyed reading the Akashic Record Player excerpts, although parts of it seemed somehow outrageous to me, there did seem to be a certain ring of truth to it.

 

earth surrender rites and kundalini

I was reading about the 'earth surrender rite' on the paratheatrical site. I like the idea of getting a sense of yourself as a 'bump' on the planet.

I think I had a similar type of experience quite a few years ago - at the time I'd been high on cannabis and my attention was fixed on listening to birds singing during a dawn chorus. (I was convinced that the birds had become possesed by highly intelligent aliens because the sounds had become very electronic sounding.) At the same time I was seeing a yantra type mandala in my inner vision. Then the mandala became a single white circle and I felt the  earth spin as energy moved through my back, this lasted only a moment.

I later interpreted this as a kundalini awakening.

I was wondering how kundalini fits into your 8 circuit model, is it associated with one particular circuit?

I was also wondering if alien encounters have been known to occur during the earth surrender rites?

Therapy

I believe I fit the description of a therapist you're looking for.  Often I have to educate clients to the 8-circuit model, it would be a pleasure to work with someone who already has an understanding of this paradigm.

 

Feel free to contact me with questions

http://www.psychdirectory.com/directory/Mental_Health_Professionals/Psychotherapy/Therapist/Personal_Corporate_Coaching/4-46-0-2826-A.html

8-Circuit Therapy

Propaganda Anonymous

PEACE Dust.

Not sure of any therapist's that work solely with the 8-Circuit Model.There may be those have who read and integrated it into their practice.However, Antero has moderated a number of classes at the Maybe Logic Academy that work specifically with exploring and developing one's "circuit intelligence"

Also, maybe try picking up a copy of Robert Anton Wilson's Prometheus Rising and do the exercises and the end of every chapter.

Bob always used to say that it is one thing to just read about this stuff, and it's a wholly other thing to do the exercises and experience this stuff.

Therapies

I've been doing a powerful therapy over the last 8 months that acknowledges the chakras (central nervous system) and how the patterning of each center relates to different aspects of personality / ego defense patterns etc. Its like a mix of inner-child work, with Bio-Energetics.

Set an intention for such a therapy and you will meet your teacher/therapist/guide...

Bless!

 

"When the power of LOVE overwhelms the love of power, the world will know peace" - J.H

WHOA

Timothy Leary is some kind of special icon to RS and the distorted history of his life's philosophy and accomplishments abounds with opinions that may or may not be accurate.  It is a fact that he was an intelligent guy, a trained Skinner Psychologist, from one of the most mainstream universities in the US. Let me start by saying that to equate Leary with the Buddha is a joke.There are so many questionable statements about Leary, Ram Dass, etc, given as facts in your article with a tone of "Know it All" that I must express some response. First you state that the MOST important question that any aware conscious human can ask is.... what is intelligence and how do I get more .... I disagree with your premise and think you and Timothy have intelligence and awareness mixed up. I can think of a few other important questions to start with. Tim's eigth circuit brain system is a clever superficial collection of concepts from Buddhism, Hindusim (Eightfold Noble Path) and other wisdom traditions, just like the Book of the Dead.

Leary and Ram Dass and many others who are held up as these great leaders of the sixties as Buddhas as MVP's etc . to me were really just acting like rock stars. For me there is way too much mythic hype about Tim or Ram Dass etc. In fact Leary, as far as I can see remained a typical Skinner reductionist until his end despite eating large amounts of LSD. He was not a Buddha in my view. Skinner did not import much to compassion. Do we really need to create these kinds of false myths for our side. How can anyone that reads Alan Watts or Leary or Ram Dass now think or believe that their understanding of Zen or the Tibetan Book of the Dead in the 60's was anything but naive, superficial and intellectual, but at the time it was WOW, NEW, and their books sold well.

While I agree with many of the concepts in Leary's 8 Circuit Brain ( they are not his concepts eg interdependence, impermanence etc) it is hard to make a case that Leary's system is in any way profound or original. The reception/perception of data shocky or smooth and organization and integration of data into knowledge by complex intelligence is great but this is dimensions apart from Wisdom Awareness. Do we really need to work a system that generates more reductionist accumulation of intelligence. It is as if Leary, myself and others stumbling our way through the 60's and in reaction to big shock waves, collected pieces of wisdom globally. We tried to pretend that we had integrated these wisdom jewels into some vain new system of enlightenment, when in large part all we really had done was just to begin our spiritual journey within a maze of spiritual materialism. I think your description of the process of the 8 Circuit was really great and revealed some of your wisdom and experiences. Your interpretation and explanation of the feedback system was very clear and useful. Why do we need to make icons out of people? I am sure Leary had some fine qualities but why do you or I need to perpetuate this bullshit mythology of the man. Michael Jackson too. Plus Skinner sucks.

Why Leary was a Rockstar, or better, a true Beat

Propaganda Anonymous

I wouldn't say Leary was heavily influenced by Skinner. Perhaps in the slightest sense because Skinner was the big man on campus at Harvard during the days Leary was there.

Leary developed his own methods of psychology within the realm of Existential-Transactional Psychology, which means he, and otherswho where in that field, were more concerned with things like Communication and Personality.

In fact, Leary criticized Skinner's theory as being too concerned with only the outside world, and failing to even consider the internal movements of people.

Leary was way more influenced by the work of Harry Stack Sullivan, whose work on interpersonal relationships laid the foundation for Interpersonal psychoanalysis. Sullivan's notion of Survival Anxiety was a bog philosophical foundation for Leary's Interpersonal Grid. (which was praised up and down by nearly everyone in the academic world when LEary and crew came up with it in 1957.) The most well known practioner of which is Eric Berne with his books "Games People Play" etc.

As a clinical psychologist, Leary was about leveling the playing field and power dynamics embedded within the structure of the clinical setting. He encouraged people he worked with to regard those they were trying to help as just some regular people who needed some help, as as opposed to "patients." The word itself holds a strange power dynamic.

Leary was one of the first to work with Group Therapy and is considered a pioneer in this field.If you study Leary's work, and theory, from the beginning of his career, you can see a steady thread and line of philosophy that was innovative and important. And far from Skinner type reductionism.

Leary's definition of Intelligence. His definition comes from his training. It coincides with Communication Theory and Information Theory. Meaning that, according to these theories, Information is all around us. And so is Noise. Information has a pattern to it. Noise does not.At first Information can be viewed as Noise, because it is a New pattern, and those not willing to look for the possible pattern may be turned off by it.

Leary's view of Intelligence works in three stages, which he modeled from his knowledge of how neurons function.

First, a signal of electricity is RECEIVED by the dendrite

Then, the information is INTEGRATED by the neuron

Third, it is the new info is TRANSMITTED onto the next neuron.This is the process of gaining intelligence.

We Receive new informtaion.

We Integrate, or process this information.

We Transmit, or teach other people this info.

Sounds like a pretty good definition of Intelligence to me.

The 8-Circuit Model of Intelligence took Leary years to develop.The first time he wrote down something like it was in an essay he wrote in 1967 called "The Seven Tongues of God"

This was a synthesis of his former work with the LEary Interpersonal Grid, his constant readings in to Ethology, Brain Sciences, Information Sciences, and Qunatum Theory,and what is called The Perennial Philosophy. Buddhism, Hinduism, Pythagorus, Gurdjieff.

He went to all those "mystical" schools of thought not to hijack, but because this was the stuff coming up for him through his work with psychedelics. This is great stuff in my opinion.

It is because of Leary and his generation that there is a MAPS, that there is a CIIS, that there is a REALITYSANDWICH.

Throughout the 1970's Dr. Leary went on to develop the 8-Circuit Model. Whenever anybody criticizes Leary they never mention the series of books he wrote during this period. Info-Psychology, The Game of Life, What Does Woman Want, Change your Brain, etc.I think it is because Tim wasn't on the news all the time then.

People believed the Mainstream Media's slander and just assumed he lost his marbles.

He also went out of fashion with the Left because of being a pussy when talking to the feds about some people in the Left, which was not cool on Leary's part in the least.

Robert Anton Wilson took Leary's 8-Circuit Model and fine-tuned it. RAW's addition to the model is phenomenal and a true work of philosophical art, I think.

This map is a very useful one when exploring one's of "consciousness" and I think this is the point of Antero's essay.

As far as Leary as a Rockstar. Well he was. With all the admirable traits and all the foibles of people like that. We Needed Leary. For better or worse.

And he deserves every bit of intelligent praise he gets, because there are still those who flat out tear the man apart, that is not useful to any one.

His whole approach was conceived as a threat to the WASP Power structure that sought to run everything when he was coming up. And he was part of a generation who would not stand by that line.

I give praises and respect to all of you who were a part of that.And I hope that those of you who were a part of that generation also see all the great additions by those who came after you.That we are all in this together, we all have are voices to add to this song, and that we can always continue to grow.

Watts

This morning I was re-reading "Aesthetics of Change", a classic of cybernetic epistemology(self-referential logic, circular causality,recursive function theory, aesthetic pragmatism) and I found Alan Watts quoted, not by coincidence...

I mean, a book of his, like "Nature, Man and Woman", written fifty years ago, where he introduces Gregory Bateson's cybernetic thinking, it's still fresh today...

He was a genius, influencing virtually all of Western culture (from Roland Barthes to the birth of the contraculture, to Ken Wilber (yuk!) ); rediscovering the secret ani/mystic core beyond Christianity ("Myth and Ritual in Christianism"); helping to spread the Sensory Consciousness movement, with Charlotte Selver; writing one of the most intelligent, deep,books about the psychedelic experience ("The Joyous Cosmology"), etc., etc., and all of this with his caracteristic anti-hypocritical joie de vivre, openly recognising his flaws...

many,many thanks, maestro Watts

(and many thanks, maestro Alli, in developing a practical application of Leary's  system)

 

"Wanderer, there is no road,

the road is made by walking". Antonio Machado

Pasito a pasito,Todo quiere ser querido.

the value of its application

Thank you all for your thoughtful responses to the introduction of my forthcoming book. I have a few responses and notes to share at this point. It wasn't until after working with the 8-Circuit Brain model for the last 23 years that I was privvy to the real depth and complexity of this grid, not so much as another eloquent mental construct but moreso as a point of departure towards direct experience of the states of being, consciousness and the autonomous forces the eight circuits merely symbolize. Much like the way some see Tim Leary himself (or his public image), I have seen many people close their minds to this grid and settle on a superficial perception of its nature and use based on a cursory examination and/or the careless misassociation with other systems. The more I have tested it in the lab of real life, the more unique and original it seems to become. I attribute this to how each user of the grid itself must first define intelligence on their own terms based on how they personally absorb, integrate and transmit the experience of each of the eight functons of Intelligence. Since each CNS differs, the 8-circuit grid offers almost infinite variations of possible outcomes. more to come... -AA

'I have seen many people

'I have seen many people close their minds to this grid and settle on a superficial perception of its nature and use based on a cursory examination and/or the careless misassociation with other systems.'

I expect this is true, because not everyone has the inclination or ability to study the model in such depth. I guess we are all doing our best to fit in as many pieces of the puzzle that make a complete picture of who we are and so even a 'cursary' examination of a system can unearth a personal treasure - we all know the feeling of coming across something that rings true for us.

How a person then fits that insight into their own model will vary and may seem erraneous to someone else. I suppose a problem occurs if the person then, as you say, closes their minds to futher interpretations, not realising that their understanding is always a work in progress. But I feel that if I were to study how I absorb, integrate and transmit my experiences of each of the eight functions of Intelligence I would be here all day and never get anything done..

How would you know ?

re: "But I feel that if I were to study how I absorb, integrate and transmit my experiences of each of the eight functions of Intelligence I would be here all day and never get anything done."

 

How would you know the results if you do not actually perform the experiment ? If this were only a naval-gazing experiment, nothing would get done except more naval-gazing. Truth is, this process of absorbing, integrating and transmitting these experiences is already happening, albeit unconsciously and/or automatically. When engaged consciously, everything changes. And you are correct about not everyone having the inclination or ability to study the model in such depth. Far fewer would be willing and able to actually apply it. In my opinion, the 8-Circuit Brain was never meant to be a populist model; it's not for everybody. As with most meaningful endeavors the more you put into it, the more you get out of it.

implementing change

'How would you know the results if you do not actually perform the experiment.'

I can see that a mere mental grasp of the model has only limited value. I get the sense that in order to implement real change one has to feel the energies associated with the circuits more fully in the body, in order to ascertain where the sticking points are - by guaging one's energetic response and body language created by the different experiences?

I'm particulary interested in trying to break through to a more stable, harmonious state of being, where I may find it easier to work through lower circuit issues.

Does the study of how I absorb, integrate and transmit my experiences of each of the eight functions of intelligence require some kind of second attention associated with the higher circuits? 

 

the second attention

re: "Does the study of how I absorb, integrate and transmit my experiences of each of the eight functions of intelligence require some kind of second attention associated with the higher circuits? "


Yes and no. There are ways to experience states of consciousness symbolized by first five circuits that do not require the second attention, in fact, we do it all the time without realizing it. When you experience basic fear or perceive a physical threat, that's a C-1 signal. How you respond to that signal defines the degree C-1 is integrated by the degree you actively restore your a sense of safety, or not.


Circuits 1-5 represent specific needs that can be seen, felt and met without the second attention, an attribute of the sixth circuit that serves metaprogramming. To clarify, first attention refers to that awareness linked to thinking, language and the automatic assignment of meaning. The second attention refers to that awareness linked with presence, phenomena, energy (without the reflex of assigning meaning). Both attentions, ideally, work together.

 

 

8 circuit Model retrospective

Since about 1991, I have devoured as much literature on the 8 circuit model as I could find. Unfortunately, it only left me with a few books by Leary, RAW, and Antero Ali's.

What I found (appropriately) missing from this summary of Leary's model is an account of just how elegant of a cosmology the 8 circuit model is. In 2001, I began working on a digital feature film that used Leary's 8 circuit model as a map and story for the experiences of the main character, and spend months in a highly creative state exploring each circuit. Unfortunately, the movie went over budget and was not completed, but in that time, I cross referenced the 8 circuit model with both science and the many esoteric systems that it integrates and had a few very profound insights from the process.

In my opinion, the 8 circuit model functions like a Rosetta stone for various esoteric and exoteric systems, uniting science and the occult into a very elegant layout.The implied cosmology of the 8 circuit brain implies teleology - or simply *Intelligent Design* of evolution - with Humanity itself becoming and returning to her rightful place, as the creative component and organizing principle of the universe itself.

Unfortunately, the term intelligent design has been co-opted by the fundamentalist right, so introducing any teleological model into rational discussion is almost impossible in any academic consideration.

Leary designed the ultimate humanist/futurist philosophical system, and it has greatly influenced myself along with thousands of others, and it should be judged academically on it's predictive powers.

Leary was such a pioneer of where humanity was headed, and when we review his work from the 70's, we can see that his many predictions of humanity in the early 21st century are spot on accurate.

As someone who works inside of the new mediums, I can say that I was 'prepped' to properly integrate the emerging technologies and I used that POV to guide my work - by Leary himself and I hope one day his model is properly discussed academically.

 

Antero Ali - I am looking forward to reading your new book - we need you active out there, everyone else from that school of thought is, um, dead! 

 

 

AA! It is Thou!

Antero! Your name came up in a conversation with Paco (Xander) recently; and here you are! I actually read this entire article without realizing that you were the author. So did you find that the structure of the Astacircuit settled down into the bottom of your spine and spun senseward? Or have you been architacting (neologism not typo) this intentionally? Results, man! Anyhoo, great to read from you! e'Leu'sis

 

"Bobos –as nascent Bobosattvas-- are pretty sure that the Queendom of Heaven is within them, and are undaunted –or even intrigued--  by the sticky irridescence of the map. "

from Tantra for Bobos

a ritual technology for Self-initiation

Much of my own substantiation of the eight circuits has come through paratheatre, a precise group ritual technology for Self-initiation (as documented in my book, "Towards an Archeology of the Soul" and in several videos). These processes of substantiation continue in me as a dynamic of intentionality and convulsion through the energetic and physical bodies.

 

In this group ritual work, I never refer to the circuits per se (I don't use the word "circuits") but focus on alternative directives enabling direct access, embodiment and expression of the internal landscape of states and forces the circuits act as mere symbols for. We are always approaching a concept-free zone of activating and empowering the energetic body through feeling the physical body (very) deeply.

 

details at: www.paratheatrical.com

vertical stability

I liked the notion of  'vertical stability', do you ever relate that to the 8 circuit model?

the context of verticality in the 8-Circuit model

I apply the term 'vertical stability' (in this new book) to what happens when the first four survival circuits (1-4) are integrated enough to act as anchors for absorbing the shocks from the second post-survival circuits (5-8) in this combination:

 

1/5, 2/6, 3/7, 4/8

Of course this refers to an ongoing process with no graduations or final arrivals thanks to the cosmos' constant influx of new information and experience necessitating various personal adjustments and realignments. Just as the lower circuits can anchor and absorb (or ground) the shocks from upper circuit experiences, the upper circuits also act as evolutionary triggers in the lower circuits. 


Many who first study this 8-circuit system naively impose a value hierarchy that posits apriori status onto circuits 5-8, while dismissing circuits 1-4 as "robotic" or something from the planet of the apes.  I think both Tim Leary and Bob Wilson, in their differing ways, fell into this trap.  To me, circuits 1-4 actually hold a key for unlocking a safer, more creative access to the so-called higher consciousness of circuits 5-8 but only after their mutual (2-way) vertical supports can be actualized (1/5, 2/6, 3/7, 4/8)

  approach to shocks

From the article - 'Is it possible that shocks are neither bad nor good by nature, but neutral? To assume that shocks are not neutral but always negative or positive suggests that the universe is either out to get us and burn us -- the negatively inflated paranoid bias -- or that the universe is out to bless us -- the positively inflated messianic bias. I think both biases express self-delusion.'

 Ouch! I suppose I have quite a treasured notion that my world is in a sense my own dream created by my unconscious self, that the essence of the world is the same as my own essence and is therefore benevolent torwards me..  This seems not only comfortable to me but also fits in with my experiences and logical reasoning, although I do remain uncertain about it.

Reminds me of the quote from RAW's home page - 'You should view the world as a conpiracy run by a closely knit group of nearly omnipotent people. And you should think of those people as yourself and your friends...' although i don't think he intended anyone to take that too seriously...

 You go on to say - 'If we value a choice-centered life of increasing autonomy and self-responsibility, how we respond to shock may have more lasting value than any initial shock itself.'

In another article called 'The Magus and the Mystic' you compare these differing approaches - do we surrender to the forces like the mystic or work to control and direct the forces like the magus?

I prefer the former approach..which I think tends to view the Universe as benevolent. 

I was just curious about how you view the world around you  - is it out to 'get and burn you', or 'bless you', or neither, or both, or don't you know, or do you adjust your viewpoint to suit the circumstances?

Do you take the approach of mystic or magus?
 

magick and mysticism

ada ~ the terms magus and mystic express simplistic categories representing opposite ends of a spectrum of how we might orient ourselves in the world. as we are far more complex than any category imposed on us, each of us embodies characteristics and tendencies of both in varying degrees of latency and expression. if a gun were held to my head and i was forced to confess, i'd still say "both".  as for how i see the world, that depends on the moment.  i am too fond of the sense of immediacy (read: hakim bey's "immediatism") to be guided by preconceptions and am having too much fun living without a self-image to go back to one now. 



"both"

It's a bit like trying to embody a paradox - between free will and surrender, operating together, it's difficult to think about it..

a pair of ducks

re: "It's a bit like trying to embody a paradox - between free will and surrender, operating together, it's difficult to think about it.."

 

Difficult to think about, easy to experience.

Paradox transcended

Either/or is a notion imposed upon our somatic consciousness by the very nature of our material existence.

Whenever you are given one of two choices, consider the possibility of Both, and then work out the logic to your satisfaction. (It gets easier and easier)

Once you can comfortably see the logic of Both in all dualistic choices, replace Both with the possibility suggested by the expression Not Two, and then work out the logic implied therein. (a little harder)

Once you can comfortably feel the unity of Not Two in every suggested choice, you'll notice that your consciousness is being driven to a state where paradox ceases to exist.

 

Then the goose is really out

Then the goose is really out of the bottle!

Fantastic job, Antero.

Fantastic job, Antero. Everyone gets the Leary they deserve and it's obvious you got one of the Higher Models. I'll be looking forward to reading more of your work.

The Inner and Outer Shocks

Outside shocks tend to be far more effective in transforming and shaking things up than any self-created inside shock.

 

Thank you for writing this article, I found it a very entertaining read. Whether or not the 8-circuit model constitutes the objective reality of our consciousness, I'm not concerned with, as I find profit in many different models or representations. Where I find that value, specifically, is in any model which attracts my attention and causes me to be interested in the nature of my Self, asking me to become open to new possibilties and perspectives ... then I can begin to experience my Self for my Self. Really, just lovely :)

I quoted the above excerpt because I seriously question your statement that outer shock is more effective or transformative than the inner. For who? In what instances? I have some insights I'd like to share.

First, it is arguable (at least from the perspective of the teachings of GI Gurdjieff, who in my opinion, was far more than a mere 'philospher') that human beings, AS WE ARE, are stimulus-response machines. Some outside event, or shock, knocks some level into action, which in turn hits a gear, and so on and so forth until VIOLA -- a "thought", "feeling" or "sensation" is produced. Because of the effects of what Gurdjieff calls "kundabuffer," our ego perceives this event as being unrelated at best, or even CAUSED by the thought/feeling/sensation at worst. As we are, we see the world "upside down."

I bring this up, because within the context of his teaching, man as he is does not possess the POTENCY  of Being to be ABLE to provide shocks to himself. Everything he is, everything he 'does' is tainted by the "consequences of the properties of the organ kundabuffer," that is, by self-love, vanity, conceit, and other "unbecoming" attributes, and therefore, any attempt from within himself is doomed to only make him "Idiot-squared." To dream that he is awake.

However, some have more potency of Being then others, and are therefore, more able to Work. We can, as you say, provide some inconvienience to ourselves in the midst of daily life; let's say, by only using our left hand for the day, not saying "I" to everything, walking with a pebble in our shoe, whatever, but these can only serve to bring us to a point of the "realization of our Nothingness." To see that we CANNOT follow through with our task because we are mechanical. This, however, (according to the teaching of Gurdjieff) is not enough. Something more is necessary, but HOW?

Gurdjieff says that man does not have free will so much as an ability to choose his influences. In a way, we can choose which 'currents' to put ourselves under, once we see where it is that we wish to go. One of the aphorisms on the wall of his Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man read: "Here we can only direct and create conditions, but not help."

I don't mean to stray from the point, and I believe that the above aphorism gives us a very good picture of the situation; in fact, I believe it reaffirms your statement quoted above. The important variation I'm stressing here is not that the outer is better, but that the inner is currently IMPOSSIBLE. We lack what Gurdjieff calls our own "Law of Three." The ability to apply an affirmitive, denying or reconciling force to the needed interval of the octave of any process ("the Law of Seven"), inner or outer, in the form of a shock.

But even then, putting ourselves into favorable conditions for the evolution of consciousness, or Work (that is, conditions which evoke our fundamental weaknesses inherent in our psyches, thus engendering what Gurdjieff called "the first conscious shock," i.e. self-remembering) is too passive an approach for the times we find ourselves in. It's too easy to put ourselves into a difficult situation and then, by the SHOCK of the situation, forget ourselves -- go back into the surivival circuits by  necessity, then come out the other end of the situation maybe 10 minutes later and find ourselves looking back saying "wtf, mate?" It's easy for Work On Oneself to become a compulsion to put oneself into difficult situations, all the while forgetting the purpose. To evoke what has hitherto been dormant in our consciousness. For that, someone must be home.

So (if I understand the teachings of Gurdjieff even a little, which is a BIG if!) the Work effort must comes from both directions simultaneously, even though we lack the being-ableness of an inner effort -- one must help the other. At one point (I believe it was in his Third Series), he states:

<cite>“There are two struggles—inner-world struggle and outer-world struggle, but never can these two make contact, to make data for the third world. Not even God gives this possibility for contact between inner- and outer-world struggles; not even your heredity. Only one thing—you must make intentional contact between outer-world struggle and inner-world struggle; only then can you make data for the Third World of Man, sometimes called World of the Soul. Understand?”</cite>

What I'm suggesting is that the idea of inner-shock and outer-shock be reevaluated in light of the reconciliation of opposites which happen at the higher circuits of consciousness, to use Leary's model.The idea of "inner" and "outer" really needs to fall away, or rather, become One. What's being asked of us is that we intentionally intersect our personal weaknesses with an intentionally established Aim, outside of ourselves. Some goal which we wish to accomplish, but as of yet have been unable. This is where Gurdjieff's work becomes beautifully practical. In order not to forget ourselves by the nature of a shock, our effort must be PERSONAL. That is, related to an essential wish, a striving. Then, we must mercilessly endeavor to actualize that wish, whatever the cost of subjective suffering. Then, the inner and the outer become one struggle, and slowly, but surely, we accumulate an energy which provides the potency to be able to Be, and little by little, we move more and more from the coarse influences of society, programming, conditioning, the moon and the planets, to the finer influence of our own inner authority, our true Self, our Conscience, which Gurdjieff so eloquently equates to the sunken continent of Atlantis.

 

Sorry to go on ... I've probably been reading too much "Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson." 

 

 

on the accumulation of presence

Apsinthion ~ Thanks for your post and your thoughts on the nature of shock.  Since I do not ascribe to any school of Gurdjieff or his terms and definitions, I have taken the liberty to define my own terms based on my ongoing self-work with direct experience and delusion. I use the 8-circuit Brain as a map to measure and test my own assumptions, not as any model that constitutes the objective reality of consciousness which is laughable. My only use for a map is to throw it out after I find the territory.   

I agree that most people may be incapable of shocking themselves on purpose (ala "inside shocks") yet I have seen how we are all adepts at shocking ourselves silly without knowing it. Not all inside shocks are 'conscious shocks'. And not all outside shocks are equally effective in their action on the awakening person, as so much depends on how each of us responds to the real life shocks that come our way.  

The outside shocks I am most interested in are only shocking to the degree of my naivete around the innate realities of Ecstacy, Uncertainty, Indivisibility and Impermanence (corresponding to circuits 5-8, respectively); the nature and quality of shock being relative to ego naivete. To the degree I am living with awareness of these innate realities (and not in denial of them), seems to be the degree I am also waking up.  

The wisdom I read in your post arrives in your recognition that each individual comes with their own unique strengths, qualities and limitations that bear on what they are able AND willing to do, given the power (or BEING) enabling real action or work in the first place.  This is where I resonate with what little I know of Gurdjieff's vision, that one cannot really DO until one has accumulated enough presence to BE.  My process of self-work involves this accumulation of presence but even moreso, a vigilance for the causes of power loss in my life and exposing whatever daily habits fail to feed the BEING and/or slowly starve it to an untimely death.

I use the 8-circuit Brain

I use the 8-circuit Brain as a map to measure and test my own assumptions, not as any model that constitutes the objective reality of consciousness which is laughable. My only use for a map is to throw it out after I find the territory.  

As a practitioner of NLP and hypnotherapy, the idea that "the map is not the territory" is an incredibly powerful way to help people find an absolutely necessary seperation between how they are perceiving their enviornment, and what is actually perceiving it. From there, we can reaccess where it is they would actually like to go, then we can create a new, more functional map. A great job, really!

To the degree I am living with awareness of these innate realities (and not in denial of them), seems to be the degree I am also waking up.  

One of the corner stones of Gurdjieff's teaching (towards the end of his life, at least) is that the key to waking up lies in what he calls "being-obligolnian-striving" and "being-parkdolg-duty." In the first case, this refers to 5 quintessential strivings that characterize a person who is working to awaken their Conscience (when Gurdjieff spoke of 'awakening' it was almost always connected with Conscience, what he called the "representative of the Creator within").From his book, "Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson":

 "All the beings of that planet then began to work in order to have in their consciousness this divine function of genuine Conscience, and for this purpose, as everywhere in the Universe, they transubstantiated in themselves what are called the 'being-obligolnian strivings' of which there are five, namely:

First Striving: "To have in their ordinary being-existence everything satisfying and really necessary for their planetary body."

Second Striving: "To have a constant and unflagging instinctive need for self-perfection in the sense of being."

Third Striving: "The conscious striving to know ever more and more concerning the laws of World-creation and World-maintenance."

Fourth Striving: "The striving from the beginning of their existence to pay for their arising and their individuality as quickly possible, in order afterwards to be free to lighten as much as possible the Sorrow of our Common Father."

Fifth Striving: "The striving always to assist the most rapid perfecting of other beings, both those similar to oneself and those of other forms, up to the degree of the sacred Martfotai, that is, up to the degree of self-individuality."

As for "being-parkdolg-duty," it is summed up in a no less cryptic formulation of "conscious labors and intentional sufferings."

Back to the point at hand, however, I mean to say that the cornerstone to Gurdjieff's methods toward awakening consist, as I understand it, in becoming a more and more RESPONSIBLE being. Truly, becoming able to respond. And it strikes me that that's what you are coming at when you speak of "the degree I am living with awareness of these innate realities (and not in denial of them)."

 

Gurdjieff also said (and this is one of my favorite G-quotes!), "The last degree of esoteric knowledge is common sense." 

presence of mind

'.. by the SHOCK of the situation, forget ourselves -- go back into the surivival circuits by  necessity, then come out the other end of the situation maybe 10 minutes later and find ourselves looking back saying "wtf, mate?"'

This is something I can totally relate to. For me an example would be getting an unexpected phone call at an inconvienient time and find myself agreeing to do something that I later regret.

I think it is helpful to think about it in terms of the circuits, in this case I might have been being automatically submissive on the 2nd circuit level - perhaps being too eager to please. Or perhaps I just wanted to end the conversation as quickly as possible.

Falling into these lapses of presence is something I'd like to try to overcome. It's as if the sequence of events happen too fast and rather than try to slow down the brain processes I find myself being swept away by the pace of them.

I think this is why I find it easier 'conversing' on the computer via blogs etc because there is time to reflect.

Attempting to remain aware in situations where I might normally resort to unconscious programming is a goal I'd like to set for myself.

 

Attempting to remain aware

Attempting to remain aware in situations where I might normally resort to unconscious programming is a goal I'd like to set for myself.

I've got to say, that's a great goal! Just remember, everything comes at a price ... what are you willing to pay to achieve this? 

'what are you willing to pay to achieve this?'

I'd have to give up complacent familiarity with things, give up certainty. I'd have to broaden comfort zones, give up addictions. Give up what's wasteful, give up being inflated and deflated, give up worry, give up belief in my own ideas and especially, give up laziness.

The price I'd have to pay would be heavy...so I can't say I blame myself for trying to get something for nothing. :)

 

From a long time reader

Antero, I actually quote you and provide a link to your website in an essay on this sight - search: "Co-creating the World-Soul" though i screwed up when i posted it and lost the paragraph structure so its one big block (unfortunately) of text. I read Exo-Psych and Cosmic Trigger when they came out when I was 20. Later read Prometheus and Angel Tech.

Anyway, Antero...

...I have also often thought that Jose Arguelles' "Earth Ascending: An Illustrated Treatise on the Laws Governing Whole Systems" explores ideas very similar to Leary's direction in The Game of Life, arguably Leary's magnum opus on the Eight-stage system. At any rate, it is kind of amusing to look back and realize how much Angel Tech influenced the metaprograms of this transceiver. Mutants Arise and All Hail Eris, JK

circuit seven adept, Jose Arguelles

When living in Boulder (1984-88) I had the good fortune to meet and work personally with Arguelles and discovered in him a pioneering spirit similar to Tim Leary; both were visionaries who opened new doors for the collective consciousness.

Jose is what I'd call a 7th circuit adept who helped bring planetary consciousness to the masses back in the early seventies with Earth Day and then, later with the 1987 Harmonic Convergence rituals. Also like Leary, they became so deeply immersed in their big picture visions that their writings grew increasingly impenetrable and obscure. Genius has its price...

I remain grateful for the lasting influence of both these adepts (along with the written realities of Robert Anton Wilson and Christopher S. Hyatt), if only to discover which of the memes they carried persist throughout the coming years.

ANTERO!

I love your books, and they've taught me quite a bit esp. Angel Tech (MUST READ!), as well as amused me immensely, esp. The Akashick Record Player, and its remix on deoxy.org...

RESPECT


Ritual theatre is where it's at...

The 8th circuit model was 7 circuits to begin with but then Leary added no. 8 when he did ketamine!!! am i rite?

It was good but is now obsolete (for me) as are any other kabbala-style models drawing lines and diagrams and so on... easily misconstrued as hierarchical arrangements, which brings people back to below zero.

The 2D or even 3D simplification is not relevant to my experience any more - too in the head!


some comments on the topic:

As for Leary, i didn't know the man personally, but i can say I don't share the enthusiasm about him or what he did with the LSD...

In fact he may well have been somehow set up to do what he did so as to ensure that psychedelics get forever dumped in the "dangerous crackpot" bin and their potential for transformation of the West blocked in public opinion for good.

Just note the hints of patronising cynicism whenever any modern supposedly cutting edge journalists refer to "consciousness expansion" and psychedelics. They will not say they're bad, they're more sophisticated than that, but they'll imply their use is a dead end, akin to belly button gazing, or making oneself faint by squeezing one's neck arteries. It is relegated to "adventure journalism" and totally displaced from any potential positive application within our societies.

Even many of those that took acid back then, and mouthed off the usual (r)evolution slogans- and then sold out, now refer to all that as crackpot, pipe dreams, while waving their gold cards - what really matters , after all.  

One of the reasons for this is that the ex-hippies, now yuppies are right. LSD fails to deliver. Leary should have stuck with the low-key magic of mushrooms and other natural medicines, but no, he wanted to go for MASS EFFECT, in his typical Irish monomania.


Antero, your thoughts on "CS Hyatt, PhD", real name Alan R. Miller,  and Newfalcon (which published your books too) would be much appreciated, in light of recent "developments" or devolvements!

I was shocked to find more about that liar now that he's gone & disgusted to have put so much time and energy in studying and occasionally practising his work.... this has done little to reduce my cynicism on just how rotten America and freemasonry is!


His son writes:

 Dr. Hyatt was a Libertarian of the Ayn Rand school, .... Some time before his death, he was formally elevated to the IX° by O.T.O. in recognition of his spiritual stature and integrity of character... (!)

A highly successful businessman,  he at one time owned his own private jet, was an avid yachtsman, a hunter, firearms enthusiast, and motorcyclist. He was also an observant Orthodox Jew whose religious practices were at various periods intensely rigorous. He traveled to Israel, and advanced the work of the Chabad through charitable contributions, serving in an advisory capacity to his local Temple, and was a friend to various Rabbis and leaders of that movement.

NICE, a masonic, zionist fat rich american man always ranting against dogma ( I guess orthodox jews are beyond human dogma and onto DIVINE LAW) while teaching the naive hippies (who he derisorily called the great unwashed)  how to "undo themselves" presumably so as to become "free" and "succesful" individual american enetrpeneurs like himself. Gah, vomit!

The Nietzchean ideals of the Superman that he was promoting really smack of fascism. NO surprise the extremely bad tasting and badly drawn comics at the end of the original edition of Undoing Yourself was removed in later editions...

Antero, looking forward to yr comments!

http://www.tranceparents.org/


Keeping Up Appearances

 

Just note the hints of patronising cynicism whenever any modern supposedly cutting edge journalists refer to "consciousness expansion" and psychedelics.

 

You'll find the very same journalists at certain higher-quality underground gatherings, expanding their consciousness psychedelically in sophisticated environments of controlled chaos that have more in common with the Pranksters than with anything Leary envisioned while meditating.

Openly advocating the left-hand path always leads to trouble; better to leave a trail of clues for the proper heads to follow.