Alex Grey and the Mind Parasites

Alex (left) and Jonathan
Alex's Vision
Alex was in a loft in Boston where a colleague of Timothy Leary had given a group of 15-20 people, most of them quite inexperienced, LSD. Alex took a double dose. The social environment of Alex's trip was extremely chaotic--some people were laughing uncontrollably, some were vomiting, some were groping other people, and there was no one who was managing the chaos. Alex began to have an out-of-body experience, and found himself hovering above the weirdness of what was going on in the loft. On some different plane he saw deities drinking from a pool of "electric milk" a "vast lake of timpani," of "vibrating energy." Alex described the vision as follows:
"I had a vision of the group soul of humanity as a perfectly circular pool of intense living light. All around the rim of the milky pool were a complex variety of sexual rites, a metaphor for all social interaction. Translucent Hindu deities swooped over the group taking the excessive energy of the shimmering pool and passing through the group as ecstasy and pain. I saw that the reason we were all brought together was to provide a psychic energy feast for the Gods and Goddesses. I saw my heart as the axis of karmic, earthly, and universal energies, transected by and uniting the polarities of male/female, birth/death, good/evil, and love/hate. To maintain a balance of forces we all fed both Deities and Demons."
This visionary experience eventually became the masterpiece: Demons and Deities Drinking from the Milky Pool.
( This painting is published in Sacred Mirrors, which is filled with extraordinary images and you can order it through alexgrey.com, Amazon, etc.)
A Vision of the Top of the Food Chain
The demons and deities were feeding from a pool of "vibratory energetic milk" created from human activities of all kinds, though Alex used sexual coupling to represent human activities in general. I suggested that that the couplings were visual shorthand of human energetic transactions of all kinds and Alex responded enthusiastically to that description. Apparently, the deities were drinking from a vibratory pool of the energetic metabolism of the species so that through the pool they were drawing energy from the entire species.
A reductive way of describing Alex's vision is to say that it represents the very top of the food chain. The painting, however, is much more than that; it is a revelation of the human form transcending the food chain. Transcendence does not mean removing or floating above something. What you transcend is still present, and the transcendent state includes that which is transcended while new vistas of awareness are added. Alex's paintings are "forbidden seeing" --revelations of what is hidden but that the species desperately needs to see. Conventionally we see ourselves as the top of the food chain, but Demons and Deities... reveals this as a delusion convenient to those who harvest our energy. Another realization about this painting is that it is a classic illustration of the alchemical principle of "as above, so below." We see the same range, if more polarized, of darkness and light amongst the deities at the cardinal points of the mandala as we do in the human couplings that form the perimeter. And there was also a similar dark/light range in the chaotic loft where some people were acting out dark compulsions while Alex was receiving this transcendent vision.
Sexual Chi as Food Source
Alex's artistic decision to represent all human activities by a range of sexual couplings was no random choice. Sexual chi is a potent energetic food that can be harvested by human parasites and predators and possibly other types of parasites and predators. Orgasms can be viewed as energetic flowers blossoming in the collective human energy field. The couplings are arranged in a kind of circular spectrum from loving couplings to atavistic, sadistic-looking couplings. Benevolent entities appear to be feeding off the energy of the loving couplings and demonic entities, one of which looks like a devouring vagina, are feeding off of the degraded (sex as a metaphor for power) couplings. Orgasms, which are energetic eruptions into, and interpenetrations with, the collective human field, vary from the ecstatic unions of loving soulmates to the sadistic ejaculations of rapists. The couplings that Alex depicts in this image can be viewed as a circular spectrum of these possibilities oriented to the cardinal points of a mandala where there are also associated deities.
A Carnival of Lost Souls
The background of Alex's vision is also interesting and instructive. He was in a chaotic boundary-dissolving experience with a group of people who were predominantly strangers. Socially dense environments of strangers and substances mixing together are likely to default to lowest-common-denominator factors of social parasitism/sexual predation/chaotic acting out of fragmented personalities-what I sometimes call a carnival of lost souls. Everything depends on who are the particular people in a group that is having a boundary-dissolving experience or ritual. Naïve people frequently forget this. Such people think the ritual is what matters and take all comers, but this can be a disaster! Generally, I think it unwise to have boundary- dissolving experiences (such as sex and/or hallucinogenic trips) with people you don't know and wouldn't trust with your life, because you are trusting your life with them. There are, of course, exceptions to everything and a visionary as great as Alex Grey was able to rise above the experience and receive a powerful vision about human energy and the entities that harvest it. (Though I have a feeling he wouldn't choose to be in another such chaotic situation.) Otherwise, I caution people about doing things such as going to a rave with a sketchy vibe redolent of prowling sexual agendas (in other words, almost any rave) and opening themselves to the toxic energy by taking a boundary-dissolving substance. Unless you want to internalize a carnival of lost souls it is probably unwise to blow yourself wide open in an setting of trance-inducing music/lighting and stoned people, many of them on the prowl for parasitic sexual encounters.
An Ancient Gnostic Text on Parasitic Abduction
The power of this image is that it shows those who harvest our energy, and yet at the center of the image is the human empowerment that occurs as we awaken to the food chain. The ancient Gnostics had similar visions and called the harvesting deities the "Archons" (see: A Gnostic View of Mind Parasites). Also, notice how closely the scenario described below parallels a modern alien abduction experience.
(The following ancient Gnostic text is excerpted from the superb metahistory.org website. Here's the link to the full article.)
From The First Apocalypse of James (NHC V, 3), a revelation dialogue in which an unnamed teacher (the "Lord" or "Master") confers secret knowledge upon a Gnostic named James:
The Master said: James, behold, I shall reveal to you the path of your redemption. Whenever you are seized and you undergo death-pangs (mortal fear), a multitude of Archons may turn on you, thinking they can capture you. And in particular, three of them will seize you, those who pose as toll collectors. Not only do they demand toll, but they take away souls by theft.
Now, when you come under their power, one of them who is the overseer will say to you: "Who are you, and where are you from?"
You are then to say to him, "I am a child of humanity and I am from the Source."
He will then say to you, "What sort of child are you, and to what Source do you belong?"
You are to say to him, "I am from the pre-existent Source, and I am the offspring of the Source."
Then he will say to you, "Why were you sent out from the Source?"
Then you are to say to him, "I came from the Pre-existent One so that I might behold those of my kind and those who are alien."
And he will say to you, "What are these alien beings?"
You are to say to him: "They are not entirely alien, for they are from the Fallen Sophia (Achamoth), the female divinity who produced them when she brought the human race down from the Source, the realm of the Pre-Existent One. So they are not entirely alien, but they are our kin. They are indeed so because she who is their matrix, Sophia Achamoth, is from the Source. At the same time they are alien because Sophia did not combine with her like in the Source (her divine male counterpart), when she produced them."
When he also says to you, "Where will you go now?"
You are to say to him, "To the place when I came, the Source, there shall I return." And if you respond in this manner, you will escape their attacks.
(NHC V, 3. 33 - 34: 1- 25. Translation from NHLE 1990, pp. 265-6 and Kurt Rudolf, Gnosis, p. 174-5.)
What I find amazing is that Alex, in creating this painting, has followed the instructions of the unnamed Gnostic teacher to perfection. The image shows that which is human and alien. It also shows that man is from the source and at the center. This is the secret of our transcendence of the food chain according to the Gnostics. The Archons are masters of deception who manipulate by encouraging us to give away our power to external saviors and authorities. We become like the living dead when they succeed, like Tolkien's Ring Wraiths--withered, obsessed beings forever craving but unable to reach "The Precious," which could take the form of an object or person of desire, or a fanatic ideology/fundamentalist religion that enslaves us to its version of salvation. When the deceivers succeed we get, for example, possessed suicide bombers hungry for death and their seventy-two virgins in paradise. The way out of this deceptive matrix is the recognition that we are of the source, of the source of nourishment. An incompleteness is revealed in the Archons because they must depend on us for their derivative nourishment. Clearly Alex was brought out from the source to behold such things and share with us his revelations.
A way out of the bondage of deception is the path of wholeness that is our birthright. The principle of androgyny, the inner alchemical marriage of yin and yang, masculine and feminine, releases us from an enslaved relation to the matrix. I have written about this in Casting Precious into the Cracks of Doom--Androgyny, Alchemy, Evolution and the One Ring
Two
Other Related Alex Grey Paintings
Two of Alex's paintings in his book Transfigurations depict what seem to me a mind parasite attack and the human condition of bondage and mind parasite insertion. In the painting entitled Despair we see a figure with his head down being attacked by small entities equipped with stingers and insectile parts while inside the mouth of some larger deity. The points of attack seem to correspond to chakras. In Self-Hate/Endarkenment we see humans held in shackles and an entity appears to be stinging the figure in the foreground in his third eye. To me it seems as if it is inserting its mind or will into this human victim.
Addendum:
After I wrote the above, on August 14 of 2006, Alex joined me for thirty minutes of a three hour interview with George Noory of Coast-to-Coast AM. After he recounted the LSD experience I asked Alex if he thought that the parasitic beings had influenced the chaotic behavior he witnessed in the loft.
Alex replied:
"At one point I did feel that this entire thing has been orchestrated by these beings, that our coming together was not an accident... When we feel influenced to do certain things, or intuitively guided to do certain things- many times we may seek guidance from a higher realm-In the same way one can be vulnerable to the influence from beings from a lower realm."
Alex then described another mind parasite experience he had under the influence of LSD:
"I remember one time being on one of the most harrowing LSD adventures I ever had. I felt like I was a flapper in the wheel of fortune and every realm of being and dimension was one of these slots that the little flapper was open to. And in one such dimension that was flying by I saw this really strange insect-like creature lunge out at me. After I came back from this trip, and for days afterward, I was really feeling out of sorts and very energetically drained. And I realized that this thing had jumped out and was probably still embedded in my aura. So I did a whole cleansing to draw all the energy back into the heart and then expand it out from the heart to banish this being."
Tweet- 9-25-11
- Jonathan Zap's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Wow
Kudos Zap! First article I read from you that I can actually vibe with :P It just so happens that, while falling asleep last night, a thought came to my mind regarding precisely this phenomenon. As I pondered each chakra being coupled with a bio-psychological input/output system, I wondered what the input/output of the crown chakra would be. Whether the flow of consciousness could be considered vertical, horizontal or both.
Instead of framing the transference of "psychic energy" in the mythology of archons and deities, I tend to consider it as more of a trans-/inter-personal process. The "higher" and "lower" realm beings represent, in my mind, the myriad bio-psychological systems comprising the self, and the benevolent/malevolent transaction of "energy" the many means and modes of transference between individuals and groups. Of course one can always argue that a distinction between psycho-social phenomena and "higher order" processes involving "energy organisms" etc. is merely linguistic or dualistic and therefore arbitrary (and I would concur), but in the spirit of our secular culture I find it valuable to communicate these ideas within the accepted paradigms of "materialistic" (pshh) science.
Thanks for the article. I love learning more about the genius that is Alex Grey.
Similar
In the Carlos Castaneda series, there are mentions of similar possibilities ... "the Eagle feeding off human awareness" ... and of course ... "predatorial inorganic beings" ... 'hence the need for "impeccable living" .. to use all of ones awareness with direct conscious intent ... no inertial sloth ... the very "psychic gravy" that attracts such "lords of the left overs" type of energetic hunger.
The "cream off the top" that we unconsciously sacrifice due to not being fully energetically integrated within our own "energetic continuum."
"Wonder is what Mystery would do if it was conscious" ...
"Wandering is for every other possibility"
freedom from parasites
All of these stories can be framed from a more personal level if one takes out the external. The thought that doubts and fears can appear as demons and thoughts of loving kindness might appear as angels is in no way to diminish them. What it does do is that it puts the responsibility and hence the control right back on your own plate. From the dzogchen buddhist view all is self, so these archons or parasites are just the embodied fears inherent in all of us. The more we buy into the them the more real they become and the minute we buy into them they become real. I am talking about taking back control for the whole human experience without diminishing ones visionary space which I feel is beautiful and as necessary to our survival as breathing. There is a Tibetan Buddhist technique called chod, where you ritually and visually offer yourself to all the demons, jealous gods and animals as food in order to break down your own fear and attachment to yourself. To quote Machig Labdron the founder of chod, " The only demon that you ever need to slay is the demon of the illusion of self" Once we destroy this demon, nothing can touch us as all is self and pure at the same time. Buddhists also talk about the six realms and our aversion and attachment to them and the need to overcome them and this is what Grey is talking about. They say one can exit suffering and enter Nirvana in a moment as one changes ones mind about the set of circumstances occurring to one. Demons can turn into angel and angels back into demons as we move from hate to love and back to hate again. This can occur in a moment and be banished in a moment. When we get to the point that we realize that we are all demons and angels and that those aspects in us make up our fine colours and our personality then we can truly begin to be compassionate and move beyond the dualistic nightmare we dance into on a regular basis. This is liberation from suffering. Check out my book and site www.buddhabrats.com or especially the left hand path as I deal with all of this and more and propose a beautiful and simple way through suffering to everything we ever wanted.
From the depths of the atomic fires is born the diamond age. Adamas
The "nephilim" + nuanced understanding of dzogchen view
* Very cool article! A nice combination of spirituality and creativity. The author is clearly quite insightful about alot of things
* I have a friend who told me a few times about these very beings - he called them the 'nephilim'...so this is very interesting. I don't know if they are real, but it's worthwhile considering.
* I need to offer a more nuanced view to in response to the compassionate offering by Adamastiamat about the dzogchen 'view' of 'self' (ie pristine awareness) in relation to world. Many teachers/texts do say 'all experience is only Mind.' However, this in fact is a kind of shorthand designed to assist realisation, to help people break out of the massively dominant belief in dualism - that they are a person 'here' in a world 'there'. It is one giant leap in the path to understand that actually, you as awareness are PRIMARY, and 'the world' is secondary. However there is another step to take. It is not precise and accurate to say "the world is you" or "you are the world".
Furthermore, telling this to spiritually immature people can lead (or contribute) to mental illness (I have seen this happen). That view is actually called 'solopsism' and is wrong, if one wishes to be philosophically precise.
You simply don't want to go around telling people that 'everything is just your mind'. Most people will just ignore it, but vulnerable people such as the mentally ill or those on drugs can take this the wrong way and - to use a shorthand: think they are some kind of 'god' - ironically becoming 'the biggest ego in the world' - and not in a good way! Whilst it is true that we are like a god in one way (pure awareness is the very basis of all experience - and therefore (the basis of) the entire universe of any individual), we do NOT have ultimate control over the phenomena that appear in that space. That is a SHARED thing. This is part of the beauty of it. Remember: the MIDDLE WAY, free from extremes.
(And by the way, a wonderful way to check any realisation is to see if it seems one-sided or extreme. If it is, it is probably off-the-mark!)
* It is not true to say that each being IS the world or "all is self". An accurate metaphor is that Mind (intrinsic awareness) is like CLOTH, and appearances are like INK in that cloth. Or that awareness is like the space of the sky, and appeareances are like the clouds. NOTE:
1. The ink/clouds and the cloth/space UTTERLY intermingle/interpenetrate, inseperably. They are not 'separate'.
and
2. The ink/clouds can never damage or change the cloth/space.
BUT they are not THE SAME thing.
Norbu himself gives the example that Mind (space-like intrinsic awareness-in-itself) is like a crystal ball. When you put it on a coloured cloth, it TAKES ON THE COLOUR of that cloth. So the EXPERIENCE is that the crystal is actually the colour of the cloth. But they are NOT existentially THE SAME. Crystal is one thing, the cloth it is 'experiencing' is another.
* Although it's good to teach others that about which you are certain out of compassion (beyond any self-gain), one reason that even quite advanced practitioners are reluctant to teach - and ESPECIALLY to act as gurus (Exemplars) - is because you have to wear the karma for any problems and suffering that result from mistakes in that teaching. So it is good to be careful. If you are teaching out of a very pure intention (beyond any personal gain) and have bent, bitten, burnt and hammered the particlar piece of gold you are offering many times until you do have a powerful certainty, then you have less chance of suffering problems later.
So for example there is little danger in teaching loving-kindness (like a 'spiritual friend'). If you are claiming to teach the ultimate teachings - or offering yourself as guru/exemplar - you need to be more careful ! It's very easy to confuse people and wrong teachings destroy people's faith in the dharma - with all the consequences for the world and the individual that will bring.
If your intention is pure but you still pass on incorrect teachings, you will still end up creating problematic karma. But it won't be as 'hot' if you did so with a very pure intention and teachings you have thoroughly tested - through life experience but also with the texts, living teachers and the sangha.
As it says in the Tao Te Ching: "the old masters were as careful as one crossing an icy mountain stream."
:-)
Emaho.
~{Seal of Mahakala}~
{{May the Buddhas and Bodhissatvas correct any mistakes I have made in communicating this, for all beings}}
thanks for the comments
Jungian archetypes
Stereotyped Attacks
LSD
Interesting,
I liked at the end, his description of how he got rid of the parasite, he made it sound so easy. In the picture self-hatred/Endarkenment it seems to me that the creature is like a pair of bellows sucking out the person's life-force, it seems if the person would just straighten up take some deep breaths and stretches, he'd be fine, but the chains seem to me to be the unconscious behavior, that can't be broken untill seen into.
All that about aliens harvesting souls reminds me of Antero Alli's book The Akashic Record Player.
Energy Parasites
"Archons"...?
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
Sorry to sound ridiculous but...
Having tea with the demons
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
Jonathan Zap of
Ask yourself a question
Fear of the Dark Parading as Critique of Fear of the Dark?
return of the archons
good star trek episode. I thought as you did once, Daruma, but some of us have had experiences that have changed all of that...forever. sounds a little melodramatic, but so are these astral encounters.
The Ghetto Shaman
http://www.dailydiscord.com/
Feeding your Demons
What struck me about this well written article is the similarity between a bon-tibetan Buddhist ritual called Chod ("cutting through") in which beings, including gods and demons are intentionally summoned and fed. The point of the feeding is, in most part, to compassionately fulfill the highest needs of all beings so that they will cease suffering. They are fed an amrita that provides not for wants but for the actual need to achieve enlightement and transformation from a samsaric state. Lama Tsultrim Allione has legitimately (not just in my humble opinion but because of her recognition as an emanation of the creatrix of the thousand year old practice, Machig Labdron) westernized a version of the chod practice called Feeding Your Demons. This practice is powerful when used on what modern psychology may call our shadow sides. The book is available on Amazon and I highly recommend meeting and working with a qualified Chod teacher/lama, as well, especially if you want to go deeper into the practice than the Western version.
Before studying the practice more deeply I believed that the Chod practice was shamanic. However, it has been since explained to me that the roots of this practice extend into the 'empty nature' and thus there is a subtle distinction that I have not yet completely grasped. That said, please keep in mind that there may be mistakes in my understanding as it exists now including my understanding that this Chod practice relates to the feeding in the article as well as other shamanic or 'shamanish' practices. May any mistakes lead to further understanding and only greater insight for any readers including me.
It depends...
I hear you, Jonathan. Certainly, it's a very slippery terrain...:
Thought-forms...they can feel robotic or hollow, lacking the spark that a living being has. (...) This happens in the relationship between such beings and ourselves. Unless the being has a strong core identity that it can successfully project into our world, it may anchor itself in our presence and relate to us by taking on some of our energetic characteristics. This can have odd effects. If a person's field is largely made up of negative, hostile, angry energies, the subtle being can take on these characteristics, too, and manifest them back. We might say, "Oh, we're in the presence of a demonic being." But the same subtle being can then go into the presence of someone who is radiant with love, joy, and attunement to higher-order energies and take on those energies instead. Now we would say, 'oh, a being of Light, maybe an angel, is with us!" Yet in both cases is the same entity.
~David Spangler, "Subtle Worlds: An Explorer's Field Notes"
If you're frightened of dying and you're holding on, you'll see devils tearing your life away. If you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels...
~Meister Eckhart (as quoted in the last scene of the film "Jacob's Ladder")
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
start with cases, not theories (inherited or otherwise)
Hyperdimensional realities and alien abductions
One of the most misunderstood aspects of the UFO subject is the hyperdimensional and paraphysical nature of the phenomenon, as well as the idea that humanity may not be as "special" and untouchable as we believe ourselves to be, but seems to be used as "food sources" in some ways. We explore the UFO phenomena, alien abductions, the hyperdimensional aspect of reality, the Gnostic's idea of the Archons, Castaneda's work, DMT induced Abduction experiences (Dr. Strassman's work), general UFOlogy as well as ancient history and esoteric significance relating to the "topic of all topics" (as Don Juan coined it).
“There are a thousand things which prevent a man from awakening, which keep him in the power of his dreams. In order to act consciously with the intention of awakening, it is necessary to know the nature of the forces which keep man in a state of sleep. First of all it must be realized that the sleep in which man exists is not normal but hypnotic sleep. Man is hypnotized and this hypnotic state is continually maintained and strengthened in him. One would think that there are forces for whom it is useful and profitable to keep man in a hypnotic state and prevent him from seeing the truth and understanding his position.”
- G. I. Gurdjieff
Great
Sex-Bugs
Dubious Sex Bugs
Zezt: In regards to
so will his philosophy
Terence Mckenna's "philosophy" as you call it? If you really understood it, would not make you make such off the wall comments about it.Terence was talking about language, in order to make himself understood by those who would understand the stuff he was point to, must needs speak in various perspectives at once.How many people have taken on that task? It is not that some aspects of his thought were wrong, or left open to interpretation, it is that he made the observations at all, that he dared to make them at all.It is not what will happen when 2012 arrives, it is about what we perceived about the meaning of the cycles of time, it is about awakening a more profound point of view, to the possibilities.It is not that nothing will happen, it is how we perceive the "nothing" between one cycle and another other.What would you have happen or not happen? What is it that makes you make such statements at all? ..."so will his philosophy?" you make it sound like his philosophy is some kind of ugly object found in a junk store.Oh his hippie philosophy, like some shmata he bought at the thrift store of philosophies that get tossed out the window, just as soon as some more important philosophy kicks it into the gutter, where all those 2012 weirdos belong, with the other rif raff that make philosophy while on grass and LSD.But of course you know all about phiilosophy.It is human to be vulnerable, and as Crowley said, "make it your own" (philosophy) as in magick in theory and practice.In theory Terence was very right on, in practice, he is the invisible hand handing you the DMT pipe,(symbolic or not) when 2012 arrives the hit will crossover a certain zero point.At that point you can speakaboutwhere the philosophy went. Way off base? from what base do you speakith?Oh, it's that habitual use of psychedelics, and we all know that somebody that does that is not to be trusted, because there are some other people that know better, aha!
When I wrote my novel about the late 60's and about grass and LSD trips I went on at the time, I was not so much writing about philosophy, I was just attempting to tell it like it was, but also to put the use of psychedelics into another perspective, so as to grok what the times a changing morphed into the times we are living through now, tosee the very human side of it, so as to better understand why it is so important to understand now.To blame people that took psychedelics then and now as someone you would not listen to, because , well.
We should blame those stoned apes, yup, we should blame those stoned poets, and those surrealists, and abstract artists, that Hitler said that if they did not change the way they see the world should be put away, yup!Because,because, well, those people that don't take psychedelics know better, just look at how sound their philosophies are, damn straight! they will servive 2012, for sure, for shore.And that fay fell-oss-oh fee of those Terence folks will just pass like a fart in the Chartres Cathedral.Sniff!
I wonder...
I wonder if this could be a more satisfying way of thinking about it.
It seems that there is a lot of resistance to the idea of mind parasites. I resisted it at first as well, but I think that actually the only thing I am resisting against is the implication, intended or not, that these things are somehow evil. The term parasite stirs images of things lurking, "out to get me", but I think perhaps that's simply a cultural belief that doesn't adequately describe reality.
There are plenty of physical organisms, Candida albicans for instance, which will opportunistically flourish in the body of people with imbalanced systems. The normal way of looking at this in our culture is that Candida albicans is a parasite, feeding off of poor, defenseless humans; in a word, bad, something to be eradicated. But looking at it ecologically, we see that this relationship is fairly normal, and that as Candida is always present in the human digestive tract, an overgrowth is simply an indicator that the system is out of balance.
Organic farmers worth their salt look at "pests" not as an evil to be eradicated, but as welcome indicators, bringing them the message that their soil is lacking something which the plants need.
Admittedly, when the soil culture is deficient and the farmer is unable to supply the necessary nutrients, the plants do get eaten by bugs... and none of us want to get eaten by bugs. But when the soil is deficient, the plants are weakened, and in their weakened state are susceptible. If the plants get eaten, the ecological understanding simply says "those plants weren't really cut out for that ecosystem."
Along those lines, I don't think that many on this website would say that the "soil" of our culture is sufficient to adequately nourish human life, physically or psychically, and same as with the plants, on the physical level, there are hundreds of organisms which are feeding on imbalanced humans today. So while I admit to having a resistance to the idea that there are invisible psychic or energetic entities which may be feeding on me, the reality is it's probably likely. I am the product of a very nutrient poor culture. Most humans aren't really cut out for this ecosystem either.
But, mosquitoes have to eat, and it's only a habit to swat them away. Once, during a meditation retreat, when I was able to step in front of my automatic responses for a time, I actually found the sensations of being bitten by a mosquito rather pleasant. And it was surprisingly gratifying to watch a mosquito get her belly full and fly away satisfied, knowing she will use my blood to create and nourish her offspring. I got a distinct sense too that she was grateful for the meal. And, while I have not had enough experience to say with any validity that this is always the case, I was surprised to find that the few times that I have consciously chosen to not just let her eat, but welcomed her and gave generously, telling her that I hope the blood nourishes her, and let her have as much of my blood as she wanted, I didn't end up with an itchy swollen bug bite later. It never even turned red. I should note, however, that even with that experience, most of the time since then when I am bitten, my awareness is elsewhere and I automatically brush them away and get itchy later.
I would posit that what the disagreement boils down to is the idea that there are some things which are "good" and others which are "bad", and that we should find, attract, and maximize the "good" and avoid, minimize, banish, and kill the "bad". We could call this idea a cultural mind parasite too, the next thing to be banished, but ultimately the idea of good and evil had a cosmic purpose as well and exists outside good and evil. As Charles Eisenstein puts it, “We embark on a journey of separation in all its forms, we reach its extreme, and we come back to Union at a higher level of complexity, enriched by our journey.”
These things, whatever they do and whatever you want to call them, undoubtedly also serve a cosmic purpose, in the same way that Candida and mosquitoes do. And, as in my experience with the mosquito, our response to them has a profound effect upon how they effect us. We do have the power to choose how we respond to them, though perhaps only when we become conscious to the unconscious nature of our typical responses.
The revolution that is underway today is starting with an acceptance of what is, with a seeking to find the rightness in all things we've been calling wrong, and allowing all beings space and support to give of their gifts. And I believe that, as my experience with the mosquito hints at, when we give of ourselves consciously and graciously, even "parasites" are grateful and don't hurt us so much as we think.
Energy Hygiene (and wild laughter, heart-centered mojo) works
At the end of the day, what is essential is to remember that we are not disempowered: First, our attitude matters
http://books.google.com/books?id=YxG1lh3iedsC&pg=PT192&lpg=PT192&dq=mojo...
and we have allies and ways to practice an energetic hygiene, both active
http://www.elcollie.com/st/chap9.html
and preventive
http://www.colleendeatsman.com/articles.html
"The SACRED (whatever that means) is surely related (somehow) to the BEAUTIFUL (whatever that means)..."
Gregory Bateson
Zezt and Wildthing
those who presume to pass judgement on others
Well said,
I grokked
You're entitled to your opinion
You are wrong
Sorry but you are just plain wrong on that my friend. It is not behaviour that is healthy for society or for children present who are yet to establish a sexual association.. this is why Islam goes to such extreme measures when it comes to homosexuality, to protect the health of society and the innocent. I don't agree with the killing or Islam, but I do agree that it is behaviour that is not conducive to a healthy society when practiced opennly.
You may choose to disagree with that if you wish, but history speaks for itself in regards to homosexual practices within a society, and our present society is no different.
Hey..
Ok
I know you don't believe me but I will say it again. I have nothing against homosexuals, period. It is just a life choice that I do not believe to be healthy for the individual or society, but I would never impinge upon your freedom to express that life choice if you wished. What I do strongly disagree with is the drive to educate children about homosexuality and the belief that it is healthy simply by democratic vote instead of actually doing proper studies (and for other sex acts too). The area that needs to be studied is mental not physical, so obviously this presents a problem.
I understand your resentment at what i've written.. it is natural to try to protect what is fundamental to being human (sexuality). But what can I say? The Gay lobby had the manuals changed to remove homosexuality as a mental illness not because any new evidence came to light or scientific study, but simply because they realized they could exert political pressure riding on the back of a wave of reformed "liberal sexuality" of the 60's. When you look back at history and what happened.. well, in all honesty can you really say I don't have a tenable position here? You can not disagree either in regards to homosexuality being unhealthy even purely on a physical level.. that is a non-debate!
I will not speak on this anymore as we're digressing the wall topic.
'I will not speak on this
'I will not speak on this anymore..'
Probably just as well.
LOL
I love how you can pass judgement on my character from a few posts.. yet as I have stated many times already I hold nothing against you or anyone for being homosexual. Who is the vile individual here really..
Sorry but you are typical of a person entrenched in the homosexual bandwagon who would cut down anyone who dare to question the concrete "facts" of homosexuality. Not because I have said anything that deserves such punishment but merely because I am encroaching upon what you believe to be your god given right to pleasure.I find that to be the most fascinating aspect of human behaviour and it only serves to show just how possessed of mind humans really are in regards to sex, homo or hetero.
Your final sentence.. LOL. No one is born homosexual, that is perhaps the most ludacrous assertion of the gay rights movement. As for my children, well, at least I will be able to provide a balanced environment.. two parents of the same sex is a recipe for disaster. Good luck with that one.
well, you've sure shown your true colors
"as I have stated many times already I hold nothing against you or anyone for being homosexual"
aah, the ol' "some of my best friends are ___" retort, that certainly doesn't get used these days. and then you say things like:
"As for my children, well, at least I will be able to provide a balanced environment.. two parents of the same sex is a recipe for disaster. Good luck with that one."
Prejudiced and illogical statements that clearly come from your own lack of knowledge and experience in such matters. Seems you already know all there is to know and have your mind made for you. Perhaps it is you who is possessed of mind, as you seem far too comfortable with your own skewed opinions which honestly don't jibe well with reality.
It is clear that you do harbour some deep resentment and prejudice towards homosexuals, and you freely admit it in each post, while perplexingly denying it in the same breath. You clearly feel there is something "wrong" about them, either on a purely sexual basis, or a relationship one (or both, it wouldn't surprise me) so you resort to using the same tired, petty "arguments" made by homophobes past. you also employ extremely snide, condescending tones when making your "argument" that paint you as a self-rightous bigot to others reading your comments, so you've already alienated yourself there. Mindsets like your own render you as freerange for any entities you think are hovering over you.
I challenge you to admit that you are homophobic, and stop lying to yourself and the others on this site. Then maybe you can make some progress.
web development
The points of attack seem to
A way out of the bondage of