Evolver: Wake Up and Dream

Reality Sandwich & Jivamukti Yoga School Present...
EVOLVER: WAKE UP AND DREAM
Saturday February 2, 8pm - 4am
www.realitysandwich.com
What happens when America's most visionary city starts building a new world by living out its dreams?
Take an overnight journey into a realm of new possibilities with otherworldly music, performance, ideas, art and alchemy. Drift through a labyrinth of rooms full of enchanted activities, glowing and pulsing artwork, exotic performers, magical chill caves, futuristic playgrounds, and endless spontaneity.
Featuring: Globesonic's (Fabian Alsultany & Derek Beres) electrifying melting pot of Afro-beat, tabla, drum 'n bass, global trance, dub, hip-hop, and house. Haj (Resident DJ of Sub Swara & Freek Factory) and his "low-end monkey business that's more about journey than genre." Hercules' (Safetycan) Hobo Tech, Freshstep and Deep Electrofunk.
Glass Bead Collective's "Spaceship Inflatable," Peripheral Media Projects' {E}volutionary {E}volver Printing, Scott Draves' "Electric Sheep," Blinky Art by Fort-Da/Image Node, Dr. Brainwave's "Mind Machine," Face Painting by Kostume Kult & Friends, "Gastronome Cache-Cache: The Masked Meal," Bill Kennedy's gaggle of dream geese, Future Unincorporated's "Poll of the Future" by Cassie Thornton, "Entheogenic Plants of the World" with Nat Bletter, chakra balancing with Lisa Paul Streitfeld, "Restoring the Revelation Dream" with Rodger Kamenetz, C. Eule Dance: "Flight of Fantasy" with video by Yuliya Lanina, ecstatic drumming with Jay Michaelson, hula-hoop instruction with Stephanie Radia, "INFINITY" mannequin installation with Kundalini Couture/Wearable Art by Selma Karaca and video by John Knowles., the "kirtan rabbi" Andrew Hahn, "Chakracize" with Kiana Love, saging by Parashakti, interactive light installation by Seej, Michael Robinson's "Universus" project, video art by Love Intelligence Group and The Housewives' Guide to AnatomyD… And, of course, that bold beautiful dreamer – YOU!
Evolvitorium, 8:30p: "Asanas and Ayahuasca"
In this talk Sharon Gannon (co-founder of Jivamukti Yoga) and Reality Sandwich's Daniel Pinchbeck (author of "2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl") compare and contrast yoga and shamanism and how these ancient techniques might just save our world today. Opening "Body Prayer" by Jivamukti co-founder David Life.
Communion Square Cafe: Courtney Weber - MC and Astro Hour with musical accompaniment by Eric Holloway, sitar and Sufi poetry with Dawoud Kringle and Asad Khan, Divine Drum & Bass Hip Hop with Naada, fantastical storytelling by Martin Dockery, David Life live, Jessica Star's Burner-Country music, Michael Brownstein's "Must Not Sleep," and Bill Kennedy on the mike. Yummy vegan food, sumptuous smoothies, & fair trade coffee.
Dreamy Costumes Highly Encouraged! 18+ with ID or all ages with a parent. No alcohol will be served. You'll need to take off your shoes when entering the dream so don your funkiest socks or slippers.
This is the first in a series of freakishly fun experiments from Reality Sandwich. Their goal is to spread ideas, connect people and reinvigorate life with creativity and spirit. As the seasons change, expect more invitations to participate in reality-changing events.
If we can build it here, we can build it anywhere. So, let's get together, New York, and start dreaming.
Saturday, Feb 2, 8p (doors) to 4a
Jivamukti Yoga School
841 Broadway, 2nd Fl. (between 13th & 14th St. at Union Square)
$15 advance tickets, $20 door
Tickets: http://www.jivamuktiyoga.com/fms/event_fm.html
www.realitysandwich.com / www.jivamuktiyoga.com
- 1-30-08
- Jonathan Talat Phillips's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
ShareThis






Comments
Evolver returns
Ooooooooh that looks a lot of fun.... reminds me of "the old days".... too bad I can't afford plane tickets =)
I'm curious: which DJ's are spinning? Is someone going to film video to be posted here on RS?
Good luck with the party. I wish I could be there.
^__^
I was disgusted at the evolver event...
...by the toxic, ego-driven double talk of Sharon Gannon. She spoke of the ideals of love, compassion, and seeing others in our selves as if she lives by these tenets... ... and then in the next breath ridiculed and verbally attack Daniel Pinchbeck and members of the audience. I was also surprised at how many of her "yogi followers" were rooting her on as she lashed out at Pinchbeck when he expressed opinions like humans are more evolved on a concious level than cows and a human life just might have a bit more value. Crazy talk, right...? They say meat eaters are aggresive but there's nothing more vicious than a protein starved vegan on a rant. Pinchbeck made some very thoughtful remarks when Gannon paused between her hollow, unoriginal spewings... But he really nailed it right at the top when he asked her about her thoughts on how western yogic schools often lead not to any higher ideals but actually inflate the ego of the practioners towards a path of elitism. His question obviously had a ripple effect through Gannon's bloated, engorged ego because from there on it went on the attack for her. What followed was so repulsive that my girlfriend and I left immediately to escape the dark and toxic energy that had began to spiral out from Gannon's core. Reality Sandwich - I'm a big fan but PLEASE don't ever let that bitch contribute any more dribble to this site and for GOODNESS SAKE don't associate yourselves with Jivamukti. That place gives me the fucking creeps.
take some deep breaths!
Hi WMB,
The conversation between Sharon and myself was very unrehearsed and could've used some moderation, however I think it was a positive exchange, and undeserving of such negativity. I hope we can build a broad coalition of people from different disciplines who, ultimately, desire the same outcomes and are working towards it in their own way and from their own perspectives. Reactions such as this one only make that more difficult.
This was a first effort, and a real experiment. Hopefully, we will smooth out our protocol, on various levels, for the future.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
Toxic Comment
Nick, why do you feel such a strong need to choose sides and throw firebombs? We've had thousands of comments on this site, but this is -- to my knowledge -- the first to be so seething with vitriol toward a member of the community and a contributor. We want the site to have room for a wide range of opinions, lots of give and take. What's the point of spitting bile?
Honestly, I don't think Sharon came close to "lashing out" at Daniel. And Daniel, frankly, wasn't trying to "nail" Sharon -- just to ask provocative questions.
You and I and Sharon and Daniel -- all of us are engaged in a conversation about how best to transition from a self-destructive way of being on this planet that is threatening the sustainability of the ecosystem to something better. It's good for us to be challenging one another's assumptions. But there's no point in throwing firebombs.
You've got to wonder, when your own buttons get pushed, why those buttons were so itchy to get triggered.
Vegetarians cause Global Warming
Wow amazing. I also hear
sending vibrations
You've already got 'em
I'm sure you have "amazing spiritual illuminating, and off center" peeps in North Carolina who could speak at the event as well. "We're the one's we've been waiting for after all:
Have a great event. We'll be digging the synchronicity here in NYC.
live broadcast?
hmm, i wonder if we could do a live broadcast of the event - you could display it on a screen, even send us questions for the q & a.
is that possible?
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
it's possible
hi dp,
it's possible, I've done it for Earthdance events...the whole global link up...it could be as simple as just projecting the screen image of the hosting computer...you would see the window projected, with all the messaging, etc...As far as broadcasting stuff at the party, proper, to be viewable online in realtime, that is also possible...just involves a couple of video cameras, a mixer, and a video codec...and, then of course, realtime streaming capability, which has to be set up with a host of some sort...It would require the proper array of people, skills, and bandwidth....is this what you're envisioning?
e
Simple Version
It could be as simple as two computers with webcams and broadband internet.
The array of people and skills is nice, but not necessary for linking parties. We did a few with Skype... in full screen mode of course.
Just a thought. Can't come to this party, but I will be there in spirit... especially since I have been using that tagline for nearly 20 years in various events and writings. Sometimes I phrase it "Wake Up & Start Dreaming," but that is irrelevant.
Peace Y'all... I hope you manage to really wake some folks up.
very doable
There's plenty of free "web 2.0" services that allow you to do this--the most popular one is www.ustream.tv. All you'd need is a laptop with a webcam--I can help you set it up when I get there:)
www.neovids.tv
where in nc?
Visuals for party????
yay!
So excited that I'll be in town for this! Yay!!!
Adam Elenbaas
:)
Sounds like a blast. I'm looking at flights...
;)
st
Overnight visitor
Somebody musta read my mind!
I live at the Jersey Shore and can drive in to the city, but I need a corner somewhere to sleep in so I don't have to drive back in to Jersey in the wee hours. I'm well trained and never mess where I'm not allowed.
Please email me if you can help.
"If only I could remember the future"
Megatripolis
Stuck on the wrong side of the pond here in the UK, but from reading the post, it really reminds me of the megatripolis that used to be held once a month at heaven in London during the mid nineties. I was running a BBS for heads at the time, and we used to go down there with a powerbook to try and find new members. I saw Terence Mkenna do an amazing talk there to. Sounds great guys, and I'm jealous. Enjoy!
whatt, i am tempted to spend
Wow - looks like an amazing
Why only NY? :( The West Coast is missing out.
I just got back from this event...
...and I must say I was not impressed.
I went in expecting so much, but came back feeling good about the burrito I had on my way home, and that's about it.
I'm not going to sit here and type out all the smaller problems I had with the artsy/experimental portions of the event (with which I have a few) because they weren't that big of a deal. My biggest issue was with the opening debate/argument/Q&A/shit-show/whatever it was they were trying to do. I'm not an over-critical guy, so realize I must have really been put-off when I say that this was the most unorganized event I've been to in my entire life, flat-out.
It started late because there were so many people piling in (understandably so) and nobody seemed to mind, we were just happy to be there and be free and be calm. Then, after a fun little intro about the animals and spirits of the world, we went right into it: an opinion contest between Daniel Pinchbeck and Sharon Gannon. Why do I call it that? Well let me start by being kind first.
I LOVE Daniel's writings, his book on 2012 and the need for a global change in the human psyche was awe-inspiring for me. I've really found incredible insight in his writings. And Ms. Gannon is obviously extremely learned in Yoga and far beyond (I don't know of her as well as Pinchbeck but I respected a lot of what she had to say and her views on consciousness).
That being said- the way they handled the "talk" was sub-par. First of all, we all arrived expecting what they told us to expect from them: they were to compare and contrast yoga and shamanism and how these ancient techniques might just save our world today. WHAT DID WE GET IN STEAD??? Daniel Pinchbeck basically attacking yoga as a whole in front of a large audience and using Sharon Gannon as the person to describe his opinion to (in a rather offensive manner). Then (even though I believed Sharon was more in-the-know all night) she would strike back with her own feudal attempts at debate which would QUICKLY turn into boring argument with Daniel. Meanwhile, hundreds of laid back fairies and pixies and lizard-men and bird-children all watched in horror. We sat in the crowd and watched everyone begin to squirm in their seat when we all realized there was literally no structure to this "debate" and it was becoming a pissing contest of sorts. The fact that we could so easily sense the bad vibes pulsating and growing stronger was enough to make my skin crawl. Finally some crowd members began to speak up and voice their opinions out-loud, when they couldn't take it anymore. Sadly, some people began getting out of hand, and I even witnessed some people yell angrily at their own sitting neighbors (mostly out of frustration from what Daniel was saying... no offense Daniel).
I'm not going to go too deep into this because it's been enough for one night and I'm sick of remembering it. I'll end it with this though- we are all looking for a change, for something new. We all tend to agree that we need a GLOBAL TRANSITION into a more SACRED way of life. But how on EARTH are we going to do that when those of us who want to be leaders, can't have a night of "transitional" proportions without simply arguing. Because that's all I saw tonight with these two folks. Argument. Which led to more argument. I SAW A GIRL LIVID AT DANIEL IN THE CROWD. I saw a girl outside after we left about to burst saying she couldn't believe what she heard. I saw the co-founder of Jivamukti Yoga unable to contain herself and decide to be argumentative. I saw little to no real structure.
I don't know for sure what we want but this was NOT it.
leaders
If you want to entertain "those who want to be leaders", don't be surprised if they let you down.
Daniel Pinchbeck is primarily a writer and an intellectual earning a living from theorising on entheogens and 2012, not a serious psychonaut.
Disaster
Unstructured to say the least. Cheesy and lame to say the worst.
Part of the problem is Daniel's approach is analytical and skeptical by nature. So, putting him up there with someone as dogmatic as Sharon was like the worst alchemy imaginable.
Launching into a statement about how Western Yoga is elitist was not going to get a good response. Though I have to say there was validity to his statement, the delivery was a bit harsh. But her response to everything was very much like she was quoting scripture the whole time.
Also, when that fellow got up on stage and presented a VERY good argument about why there is a balance between passive/aggressive in nature and so in man, using tribal cultures as an example on how they hunt animals etc..and this is part of the balance of the ecosystem to be consumed and destroyed in order to keep creation going, Sharon's response was to attack the guy because he mentioned the Bhagavad Gita and he hadn't read it front to back. That wasn't even the main thrust of his argument, but that was all she could grasp onto. Nevermind, the rest of what he was saying had validity. She wasn't going to concede to any of the other points.
I understand a large part of her philosophy is animal rights. That is a worthy cause. But as soon as Daniel made the statement that animals don't have the same consciousness as humans it was like a needle stuck on a record. But if you think that a vegan philosophy can be applied to all cultures and ways of life you are being very narrow. You aren't going to go down to the Amazon and tell the people there they shouldn't kill monkeys or jaguars because they have a 'consciousness' and it's wrong. They aren't being spiritual because they eat/use animals to survive? Cultures that are in touch with nature and it's cycles and with respect take and give back are more 'spiritual' than a bunch of Westerners sitting in a yoga studio doing asanas or arguing bullshit philosophy about the definition of consciousness.
That's where the elitism comes in. When you think your way of life can be applied to all. There are many ways and forms to worhsip and be spiritual and last night was not a good example of any of them.
We have a long way to go, but first we have to crawl out of our own asses.
smudged
hey y'all
www.organelle.org
www.truetao.org
Well
evolving evolver
www.organelle.org
www.truetao.org
WNB
Wow, Whoever you are darling, it is your Karma to see things in this way. After all, do not forget that YOU manifest all that you see. This is the law of KARMA darling so get a grip because it's going to get much harder than a small disagreement between Daniel Pinchbeck and Sharon Gannon! They have been friends for years so if you saw THAT as a lashing? Honey... You may need to meditate and tune in to your state of mind and body. I in fact sat in the front row and watched Sharon patiently remain quiet while a couple of (let's just call them ignorant)people stepped up to the Mic quoting the Bhagavad Gita with no obvious knowledge. People stating that "killing is the beauty of life". "The kill, the hunt" is a ritual of sorts. That is a statement of mis-knowing and Sharon simply asked the oblivious young lad if he had studied what he quoted... The guy said NO. End of story! Sharon has been on many panels with Daniel Pinchbeck and she knows his views on vegetarianism and animal rights. This came as no surprise to her when he stated that Humans have a higher consciousness than Cows for instance. However, yes, to her students this WAS a surprise! So because Human Beings are a more "intelligent" species, we therefor have a higher "Consciousness?" To be Conscious is to be AWARE, known or felt by ones inner self. To say that a Human is more conscious because we can talk, because we're "smarter" has nothing to do with consciousness!! Her simple rebuttle may have outraged those meat-eaters that can't seem to wrap their heads around the gravity of our global crisis. And hey, that's ok! We are not making you become vegetarian, do and live as you please! Yoga is the state of union with your divine, higher source. Their is no judgement as to your choice of food and way of life. But don't get upset when you come to a discussion to hear to authors with very different views talk about their opinions on right and wrong. COme on! Lighten up. You're in the heart of NYC in 2008! What do you expect? Fluffy BS about hey, it's ok to chomp on that steak? No baby! Wake up and smell REALITY. Dismantle your perceptions and be open to a positive movement toward change and upliftment. Don't call a holy teacher a bitch because what you put out there, as the law of Karma will continue to show you, will come back and bite you in the ass!
OM SHANTIH! (Peace) NAHDI DEVI
on the other hand
The unique thing about the party last night was that two seemingly different crowds came together and got to know one another, shared some space, shared some dialogue, and shared some love.
I thought that the conversation contained many moments of ego, both on the part of the audience members and the speakers. I was impressed by things that were said by both Daniel and Sharon AND the audience members.
The bottom line is that none of us are above acting from a place of ego, and we can all work on that in different, personal ways. In the meantime, the dialogue was fruitful for me. I had to sit with difficult feelings about myself, about spirituality, and about two people I admire for different reasons.
The coalescence of a visionary community can only ever happen in the moment. IF there was stress last night, that doesn't mean there is now, for me, right here. I believe that turning within, turning the other cheek, running away, standing up, it all has its place. Not because theoretically all things are relative but because all of these do in fact happen.
Therefore their theoretical value, to me, is good insofar as they are actually occurring. And last night they both occurred, and those of us who like it to be one way or another, or found ourselves in one temporal location over the other, might have been a bit shaken by one or the other.
But the point of yoga or Ayahuasca, things I have several years of experience with respectively, is, as both D and S said, to open up new spaces, within and without. I think new spaces were opened up last night, not for a collective that I can speak for, but for a space within me.
I was opened up, and I will take this new space with me and occupy it in a way that opens up spaces in the world outside of me. Blessing both spaces and bowing my head for the mystery and challenge of being.
Thank you Daniel and Sharon for your hearts. You are loved by people who are seeking more love, within and without. Let's have more dialogue, even when it hurts our collective muscles to stretch out! My only regret was that we couldn't have gone a little longer!
Adam Elenbaas
Seriously Disappointed
somewhat astonished
I am somewhat astonished by this comment and many of the other comments. I am first of all astonished that you would fly up from Florida and not introduce yourself to me and the others on our team - or perhaps you did and in the mad flurry I missed it. I feel there is some misconception in the energy of this comment and other comments, and I really would like to get at the root of it.
I am somewhat astonished by people's intensity of expectation, and disappointment, about this conversation. It was never meant to be some earth-shaking paradigm-defining long intellectual discourse, but a short preamble to a night of fiesta-like displays and DJs. I admit that in the heat of the moment I felt called upon to discuss some aspects of the contemporary yoga (and Buddhist) world that I have been considering for a while. I honestly felt that it was useful to have these issues raised, and the awkwardness of the encounter was, to me, a sign that it was a valuable area to explore. In writing my books, I have found that when issues are awkward and uncomfortable, that often means there is something which needs to be publically aired and examined. I would honestly say that this type of inquiry is even part of my "spiritual practice."
I have also heard a lot of positive feedback on the discussion, little of which is represented in these comments. I certainly wasn't attacking the yoga world - I said during the discussion that I thought yoga was a very important and positive force in contemporary culture. However, I worry that the retreat from the world of politics and social engagement into contemplation and asanas is dangerous for us Westerners, who have the task stopping the insane and unsustainable monoculture we have unleashed on the planet. I find the adaption of Eastern ideas about karma and gurus and so on can add to our narcissism and self-centeredness, rather than dispelling them. I also think the way the term "Enlightenment" is used is often problematic. As I mentioned, it may help to think of enlightenment as a process, rather than some fixed state that some individuals have attained while others are not at their level. I also felt the animal question needed to be addressed from my personal position. For me, there is a way that insisting that animals are the same as people actually limits and contorts our discourse around the critical issues of this time. That is not to say that I don't care about animals or think they are beautiful, but I do feel we have to make critical distinctions, or we will continue to flounder.
We all our learning, nobody has "The Answer", and if anyone pretends that they do, I recommend running from that person. Reality is much more exciting than that. It turns out that many of us, in our imperfect selves, still have crucial pieces of the puzzle to offer to others along the way. For us, this first event was a learning process, and if you had emailed me to ask me whether or not you should spend hundreds of dollars to fly to it, i would've said to wait until we know what we are doing.
Rather than continue in this line, i would love to hear some productive and thoughtful comments about what people would like to hear, see, and experience at future salons. I was a minority voice before the event, because I suspected that people would want a longer and more serious discussion. I then made a mistake because Sharon told me right before we went on stage that she wanted to keep it light and playful, and I didn't tell her that I didn't feel that way myself and couldn't really do that, but hoped to make the discussion a serious one. I therefore didn't really know how to handle the situation once we were out there. So - it was an imperfect moment, and I'm sorry you couldn't see it well because you got stuck behind a pillar in the largest room we could possibly find. That's life sometimes.
I think the event proved that many people would like to have a serious educational component as part of their going-out on a Saturday night, rather than just drinks at some pointless bar. All of the workshops and lectures during the night were mobbed. I have observed the same phenomenon developing, over time, at Burning Man. This is really exciting to me personally.
The event suggested to me that it would be great to have some kind of community space, at some point in the near future. Or perhaps more regular meet-ups.
My hope is that people will have the presence of mind and openness of spirit to look at all the positive aspects of the event, and not focus on the things that bothered them.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
Psychopompous?
This is all very curious. It seems that people would like some kind of shamanic engagement with intoxicating ideas, via the speakers, before getting into the dionysian carnival revellry of the group consciousness. This is what happens traditionally of course, in many cultures. The group push the psychopomp into trance, with shouting, drums, clapping, howling etc, hear the narrated flight to the otherworld and back successfully related, and then get down afterwards and party. Is this a good thing for our own culture? What sorts of energies are we feeding or creating here? I think its ok....a creative roundtable discussion, with audience participation, timed well and wrapped up harmoniously could be a great launchpad. But tricky to get right, obviously.
One thing I would suggest would be the use of a chairperson or moderator in such discussion oriented gatherings. Its easy for two people to find themselves irreconcilably opposed. An open-minded chair can keep things on focus. A libra probably, with a pisces moon and a sequin blazer.
hopefully
www.organelle.org
www.truetao.org
: )
The god of Victory is said to be one-handed, but Peace gives victory to both sides. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
In all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order. --Carl Jung
Truth springs from argument amongst friends. -- David Hume
I will not play at tug o'war.
I'd rather play at hug o'war,
Where everyone hugs
Instead of tugs,
Where everyone giggles
And rolls on the rug,
Where everyone kisses,
And everyone grins,
And everyone cuddles,
And everyone wins.
-- Shel Silverstein
Eddie T. (Jivamukti Yoga Teacher)
The only "Magic" is a Shift in Perception.
A lot of things have been covered in the posts preceding mine, so that i don't have to go back into it. I didn't know much about Daniel until recently, but after Saturday night, as i reacted a bit against his arguments that to me were kind of disrespectful to the fact that he was invited into the home of a spiritual school owned by Sharon Gannon and David Life, i thought if he wanted to disagree or debate about our fundamental direction "Ahimsa" (non-harming) , he should have at least let Sharon know, so she could have had the chance to reaffirm to him that she will not compromise her lineage in anyway, and that is because if you know Sharon like her students do, you'll know one simple thing. She simply advocates to the detail of the meaning, the scriptures of Patanjali.(not her own scriptures, like some ego centered Yoga teachers seeking for popularity and money first) Jivamukti is unapologetically spiritual and in no way an exercise center to show off some flexible postures while practicing vegetarianism for vanity health reasons or elitism and narrow mindedness. I rushed to read as much as i could of Daniel's book "2012" the past few days, to make sure i would get to know him better, and i certainly think that he is a remarkable being and i admire his work. I think he has explained in his own posts, that he is looking into a positive future, and maybe a seed was planted that night for a shift in perception for all. I was not always a vegetarian, and I was surely at one point of my life on the other side of perception toward animals, but by practicing yoga with Sharon and David, i quickly gave up my culinary French philosophy about 10 years ago , for the understanding that anything I will allow to be harmed on this Earth will be my own harming because there is nothing out there that isn't a part of me. (including the guy that calls my teacher a bitch.) "Compassion is potent medicine" You see, Sharon is only trying to teach us what teachers before her taugh until it came to her, and she spreads the word for who is ready to go in that direction, that yoga. Her love for animals is her love for humanity, because yogis believe they are responsible for all matter (karmas) of the universe, as we believe in re-incarnation. It is from protecting wild form of life that you can begin to help the civilised, not the other way around. The link between Sharon's convictions and Daniel's today, is for example: that it takes 17 showers worth of water to produce a single hamburger patty.(do the math) 27 billion land animals slaughtered yearly only in America (we are 6 billions humans in the world), means it's a 24 hour non-stop production of pain that we ingest and that eventually makes us behave like the pain we eat. you want to know more? be courageous and educate yourselves, if you have gone as far as educating yourselves toward Reality Sandwich,(which quotes at the bottom of the site, "You are what you eat") then maybe you can make the connection by seeing the DVD EARTHLINGS www.isawearthlings.com or go to sites like www.peta.org and find out more about the outcome of what the Earth is really dying of. If you thought SUV's were the cause of global warming, think again, and also if you don't want to buy a gallon of water for $30 by 2010. Sharon is not only interested in Yoga, or else why would she offer so many ranges of consciousness awakening events at Jivamukti, which many of them come from different lineage but have only one goal, and it's not a different one from People like John Lennon, Mahatma Ghandi and Dr. King had,(and i can certify that those 3 were vegetarians by the way.) Probably people like Sharon, David and Daniel , would have been shot 30, 20 years ago for having gathered too much popularity for a peaceful, war free, healthy planet. But now is not a time where governments of the world have as much power as they seem to. We have 10.000 folds communications tools at the speed of light such as the internet, to show the increasing number we are of people with different ideas but only one whole heart. So please , let's not use this great tool of communication to use words like "that bitch" and other small mind stuff when we can finally speak out ways to bring our different ideas to build one place where our children can live in peace and harmony . Why do you think people used to travel miles to go hang in front of the white house and protest? no internet!
Peace Peace Peace
Eddie T.
Ahimsa etc.
Hi Eddie,
Thank you for your comments.
I love Sharon and David dearly, and honor everything they have achieved. I feel the best gift I can give anyone or any situation, in my blundering way, is to say what I am thinking and engage in dialogue, even (or perhaps especially) if that dialogue is somewhat uncomfortable and awkward.
I am not against the doctrine of 'ahimsa' in principle. If we were living in a world where nobody was harming others, or seeking to harm us, 'ahimsa' would be proper and inarguable. The problem is that we are not living in such a world.
If you read Chris Heath's book "American Fascists", to take one example, you will find that there is a huge amount of wealth and power and tens of millions of adherents across this country intending to institute a Fundamentalist theocracy and bring about Armageddon within the next decades. According to the stated views of their representatives, this large and powerful sect would be quite happy to treat "liberals" and homosexuals and many other types of people in a way similar to Fascist regimes of the past. On another level, you have chemical and biotech companies and military contractors whose experiments are under-regulated and given no public scrutiny, and could endanger the integrity of all life on the planet. You also have a mass media that uses propaganda as a weapon to paralyze the mental processes of the multitude.
When I asked Sharon what is the best thing to do when faced with an enemy that intends to harm you, she said, “Run away.” How is that an appropriate response? First of all, if you run away, don’t you just leave a dangerous and violent person running around, who will most likely end up hurting others – and since you didn’t do anything to prevent this, won’t that also affect your karma? But second of all, in our present circumstances, we have no more places to run – the despoiling of the planet’s ecosystems, the extreme inequity, the growing anxiety and potential for authoritarianism, WMD, etc., require a coherent and organized response from those who believe they have attained a greater level of sensitive awareness and compassion.
We certainly can’t keep running away at this point – there is nowhere to go. My personal hope is that all of the inner work, yogic discipline, and study of nondual philosophy made by Westerners over the last decades provides a foundation for new forms of social collaboration and political change. I discussed this in the talk as a “yoga of social transformation,” the idea of using the principle of finding liberation in places that seem very uncomfortable at first as an approach to dealing with the greater situation.
Another issue for me, raised by your comment, is the literal adherence to ancient scriptures. I feel that circumstances and conditions keep changing, and therefore ancient texts should never be taken as “Holy Writ” but submitted to a continual process of criticism and analysis. The Hindu tradition out of which Buddhism arose included a dialectical approach to seeking and refining truth. This method is still practiced in Tibetan Buddhism – in Dharamsala, I saw monks engaged in public arguments, including theatrical flourishes and knee slaps when they made a great point. After he had attained liberation, the Buddha went from town to town speaking with the local sages. If he prevailed in the argument, they accepted his perspective – if not, he had to accept theirs. He never lost. I feel our contemporary spiritual culture needs a real dose of this type of intellectual engagement, which doesn’t accept “Sacred Cows” but allows for development of discriminating intellect. One of the essential principles of Buddhism is that “All is change” – taken literally, that applies to the inner nature and experience of liberation itself, as our subjectivity also changes based on historical and cosmic processes.
I also want to elaborate on another point in the discussion, when I brought up the Marxist criticisms of Slavoj Zizek, who believes that the contemporary West’s adoption of Eastern thought is problematic because it has allowed people to find a way to accept the capitalist system by maintaining a certain amount of detachment from it. According to Slavoj Zizek, Western Buddhism “enables you to fully participate in the frantic pace of the capitalist game, while sustaining the perception that you are not really in it, that you are well aware how worthless this spectacle really is – what really matters to you is the peace of the inner self to which you know you can always withdraw…” Zizek goes so far as to propose, “the onslaught of New Age ‘Asiatic’ thought… is establishing itself as the hegemonic ideology of global capitalism.” Mysticism has allowed for a new form of mystification, where hierarchical relations of dominance and control are no longer hidden or denied, but reduced to meaninglessness and relativized as an “insubstantial proliferation of semblances which do not really concern the innermost kernel of one’s being.” I am not saying I entirely agree with this criticism, but obviously, if I am bringing it up, I feel it deserves to be heard and considered.
Look at the popularity of someone like Eckhart Tolle, who is now touted by Oprah – there is a way that his neo-Vedantism allows people to feel okay about, or at least superior to, their daily participation in capitalist practices that include the domination of poor workers and the destruction of the environment.
To quote Tolle’s new book: “What is arising now is not a new belief system, a new religion, spiritual ideology, or mythology. We are coming to the end not only of mythologies but also of ideologies and belief systems.” According to Tolle, the effort that leads to the creation of his “new earth” requires no change in social practices as long as you make “the present moment… the focal point of your life.” Tolle exhorts his audience to “enjoy what you are doing already, instead of waiting for some change so that you can start enjoying what you do.” So whether you are an artist, teacher, Fox News executive, or Blackwater mercenary doesn’t matter: “The new earth arises as more and more people discover that their main purpose in life is to bring the light of consciousness into this world and so use whatever they do as a vehicle for consciousness.” For Tolle, real efforts to transform the society’s inequitable and unsustainable practices, has no particular value, or meaning, in this new paradise of pure presence.
Perhaps the deeper issue that needs to be discussed in depth is the question of sacrifice, literally, “making sacred” – what it means, what is its place in contemporary culture. That’s for another day.
What to Do?
The advice given by the yoga teachings in regard to what to do when confronted by a violent person is to recognize that this person like all beings and things which enter into the zone of one's perception is manifesting from one's own past actions. Remembering this one immediately says, "Wow I have to stop treating people like this." With that understanding of the other you then absorb them back into the emptiness of your own being where they are dissolved into loving compassion.
But for many people this is difficult and they can't seem to do it, so what to do? If you simply stand there and "turn the other cheek" you provide the violent person with an opportunity to do more violence and thus incur more negative karma for themselves.
If you react with more violence than you perpetuate the cycle of violence and the possibility of you being confronted with a similar situation at some point in your future is greatly increased.
So in that case it is better to recognize your shortcomings and to get out of the situation as fast as possible. Go back to the drawing board so to speak or better yet, go back to the yoga mat or meditation cushion. Whatever do something which helps you to deeper your understanding of reality and where things are actually coming from.
Universal Truth: Violence only brings more violence. If one's reacts to violence with violence then the result is more violence. If that is what you intend as an outcome of your interaction with this other person, then fine that is most likely what you will get. But if you would like to alter reality then it is best to first investigate what actually makes up the fabric of what we call reality. When we embark upon this investigation we do discover that we are not separate from the very 'thing' we are perceiving and by our very presence we affect it.
What is of interest me is how to affect it in a way which will contribute harmoniously and thus to a more musical wild reality.
is violence against oppression wrong?
Hi Sharon,
Thank you for your comments, and your characteristic graciousness.
I feel we are zeroing in on a core disagreement here, and it might be worthwhile to take the time to go deeper into it.
In your comment, you state: “If you simply stand there and "turn the other cheek" you provide the violent person with an opportunity to do more violence and thus incur more negative karma for themselves. If you react with more violence than you perpetuate the cycle of violence and the possibility of you being confronted with a similar situation at some point in your future is greatly increased. So in that case it is better to recognize your shortcomings and to get out of the situation as fast as possible. Go back to the drawing board so to speak or better yet, go back to the yoga mat or meditation cushion. Whatever do something which helps you to deeper your understanding of reality and where things are actually coming from.”
I want to look at this issue from a few different angles. First of all, as I noted above, if we take the Buddhist concept, “All is change,” literally, then we really cannot hold onto strict doctrinaire positions that were appropriate to the past, but must evolve our own principles and ethics based on changes in historical and social conditions. One of the great achievements of modern Western thought is a deep analysis of how material and social conditions shape human consciousness, and change it over time. A rigorous analysis of the material and social basis of human consciousness is found in the legacy of Marx and Freud. Unless we decide that there is no value to the history of Western thought, and it was all an error of the Kali Yuga in comparison to the more penetrating wisdom of Eastern metaphysics, then we have to accept that there may be developments in consciousness made by the Western tradition that great spirits like Patanjali and the Buddha were not able to access, during their historical incarnations.
The idea that one should “get out” of a situation of threatened violence “as fast as possible” might have seemed proper in the time of Patanjali. At that time, there was no global threat to the future of life on the Earth, as such. Violence was never a generalized and universal phenomenon, but a local circumstance. The yogi or sage could always retreat to a higher mountain peak, to a more inaccessible preserve, and avoid dealing with political and social conditions in the world. Our problem is that we are faced with a different historical circumstance and set of conditions, and these new conditions and circumstances seem to require a different spiritual response, ethics, and plan of action.
For me personally, the Jews who rose up to battle the Nazis in the streets of the Warsaw Ghetto, or the partisans in Spain who took up arms against Franco’s fascist regime, were heroic figures. I firmly believe that the US made the right decision to battle the Nazis, and that a policy of nonviolence would have led to the Earth descending into a hell realm. Do you disagree with these examples? It seems that many, if not most, significant progress in human liberty on a large scale has been won through struggle, such as the Civil War or the American Revolution.
The basis of my reasoning is the following: In these cases, those forced to make the choice between violent resistance, nonviolent pacifism, or running away are confronted by an opponent that represents not just a singular and localized enemy, but a global mentality and what poet John Trudell calls a “predatory virus” that has invaded human consciousness through the course of history, especially European history where imperialism, Christian self-righteousness, and technological innovation fused in a malignant global project. If you let yourself be destroyed by this force, oppose it through passive resistance, or seek to run away from it, you may ensure its continued growth. Such a decision would have karmic consequences for you, as the results of your inaction will, without a doubt, lead to the harming of other beings. Taking karma and reincarnation into account, it is logical that you have karmic responsibility for the suffering of those other beings, if you have the opportunity but do not employ the means to prevent it, even if violent action is the only available means.
When you are confronted with an opponent (that is, of course, a projected aspect of your self or, really, The Self) whose dominator mentality assures they wil continue their violence against others until they are stopped, that enemy must be subdued. Sometimes, in actual history, violent resistance to such oppression is the only way that such an opponent can be stopped. Yes, the enemy is a projection of an aspect of the self (the Atman or the “one without a second”). Sometimes we have to employ severe and radical means to overcome aspects of our own conditioning – “starving out the manias,” was a term that Buddha used.
This argument could be refined, but essentially I submit that careful reflection makes it evident that violent resistance against oppression is fully justified when that oppressive force represents a globalized mentality that will continue to do harm as long as it is not opposed with force. Hence, I would argue that the partisans of Spain, the fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto, the US Army against the Nazis, the Native Americans against the colonialists, etcetera, did not create negative karma, but moved closer to liberation through their actions, especially when their motivations were selfless, based in devotion and love for the Earth and humanity, and a willingness to sacrifice their own life for goals they knew to be true.
If this is logical, then it seems equally clear that not opposing what we know to be wrong to the best of our ability, even using violence when absolutely necessary, will generate negative karma, and pull us down into degraded forms of rebirth. In this sense, I resonate with the interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita that was put forth by an audience member during our conversation. I will look into this more in depth, but from my understanding, his interpretation was the classic one. Of course, every text is open to various interpretations, and I am not an expert on the Gita.
Having said all of this, I do not believe that we currently live at a time where violence is effective in the struggle against oppression. I do think, however, that those of us who would like to see our current society radically transformed, made peaceful and sustainable, have to think tactically and strategically, and figure out what powers are available to us to counter the weapons used against us, which include the bludgeoning indoctrination of the mass media, the intensifying of militarism and anxiety, the restriction of civil liberties through the Patriot Act (and etc), and the destruction of the biosphere by unrestrained corporate capitalism. We also have to overcome the negative character traits instilled in us by our culture, such as sentimentality and egocentrism, to work together in a streamlined and efficient way. I do worry that ego makes a return in the yoga world and other spiritual worlds, including shamanism and Buddhism, as what Trungpa called “spiritual materialism.” That someone can do a great series of asanas, or has taken ayahuasca with 20 different shamans, or has visited hidden monasteries in Bhutan, has no real value as a sign of spiritual attainment. How they live day by day, what they do with the psychic energy and time available to them, and how their work helps to liberate other people, is what matters.
"Will the transformation."-Rilke
Great points Daniel!
In the end of The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Campbell writes about what he saw as the ever increasing destruction of the spiritual connection to life in the face of the ever increasing reliance of technology. What he warned about 60 years ago is happening today. But he also talked that the new myth will be a global one. That there will be a one world vision. The question is what will it look like?
I agree with what you say Daniel,and thank you for putting your self out into the world. There is the danger of going into La-La land, as we move into this brave new world. But I also know that there is deep wisdom in what mystics like Tolle talk about. That any real transformative action has to come from a deep place of stillness or else the consequence will be more ego driven action. Look at every movement that has a intense reaction to something, and you will find a ping-pong counter reaction. History is filled with this back and forth duality. Can we accept that perhaps we as a species are destain to die, and still act from selfless love? That in the greater scheme of things humanity is just a blip in the great movement and the the perhaps at our possible demise we will find our cosmic connection. Like the ego death of every great shamanic ritual, like the moment of our death we find the great cosmic Joke of Oneness.
Yoga,Law of Attraction,meditation, mystical traditions are disciplines to connect one with a source greater than ones mind. The I have a dream speech by King speaks of a vision beyond the mortal coil/body of one man. There is something happening indeed, and real transformation only happens in the stillness. To act from such a place is powerful, everything else will probably leave us with the same old story.
just some thoughts in the spirit of good fun
"If you meet the Buddha on the road..."
Greetings!
As the founder and director of Body Temple, one of Evolver's inspirations (according to Jonathan Phillips), I wanted to offer some feedback and comments from a "behind the trenches" perspective.
To the Evolver crew. First off thanks for doing this event. It is a big undertaking and hard work to pull off anything of such a nature. To have such a large turnout first time out is amazing. There is a need to have such experiences in NYC, and since Body Temple is on hold it is great to see others fill in the gap and do so with such enthusiasm. I know you will improve as you go along. To do so you must remember one thing "The customer is always right." A lot of folks seamed to have a good time and I did hear a lot of complaints during and after the party. Please listen to the good and the bad, and learn from both. Do not offer any resistance or make excuses to what the public has to say. Take ownership and responsibility, take risks and listen and commit to improve what you are doing. You and your audience will be the better for it. In my experience how you start and end an event is very important. The beginning will set the tone for the evening and the ending will ground the energy and create the vortex for the next event. Daniel and Sharon you are the public face that set the tone for the event, so understand when you speak to an open minded audience every nuance will reverberate larger then you might realize. Be prepared. People do have high expectations when they come to a yoga space to learn and celebrate. Be aware and be grateful to have such a sensitive audience. Be clear and centered before you open the doors and you will have a victorious event and happily returning customers. Lastly seek out the wisdom and experience of the Globesonic crew,Haj, Parashakti (and me if you like). They are the co-founders of Body Temple and their own events/parties/rituals. They have a wealth of experience in celebrating in a conscious way. Good Luck.
To everyone who came and had a "Bad experience", please cut these folks some slack. Sorry to say this but writers,yoga teachers,event planners, etc are people too. And people are not perfect. I believe that the Evolver crew are sincere. They are trying to do good. This was their first time out. Until you put on a large scale public party without major budgets and booze money you have no idea how difficult this sort of thing is. If you want to have healthy alternatives to party at, then please support what they are doing, with positive constructive criticisms and volunteering to help out.
Let go of needing "spiritual leaders" to be perfect gurus. Letting go of the perfect teacher image is a big step towards maturity of the soul. There's an old saying, "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him."
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power,the world will know peace." Jimi Hendrix
Thank you to the organizers of thie event
Eddie T. (Jivamukti Yoga Teacher) to Daniel P.
Thank You Daniel for the time spent writing what you mean.I think I have met a teacher in you as well. I am plunged in you book 2012 today, and it is amazing. You are indeed a brainiac . (LOL)There are too many things i'd like to tell you about what you said, but i think we have to take it face to face, and you know where to find me.(we have met many times, and the last time was with Parashakti in the East village, walking down the street).I feel that you and I are not feeling , or thinking of the world in such a different way.You flavor it with Salt, and i do with Turmeric.I cannot speak for Sharon when you quote her, but i can say what i would have said if you had asked me the same questions, and it might have been similar answers.(i'd run away too) because if i remember the time i was 18, and 5 Skinhead punks in Paris beat me up and through me off the bridge into "la Seine" river in the middle of December, when i made it to survive out of the cold waters i certainly realized that they were not prepared for a oneness speech . So i could help them better by running away physically (not spiritually).But Hey , It was a day of great learning for me, and that is personal.You say you feel your best way is to bring , not necessarily a comfortable subject to debate. I feel that makes you an aspect of Lord Shiva. How can one who is aware of cause and effect not bow to your form and sound.-The different people that you quoted, are simply teaching yoga.Are they Satvic? (truthful) Rajasic ? (in it for the money) Tamasic? (in it for the power).I don't know!What i think, is that each follower of a "way out" of feeling disconnected or separate from others , has his/her own teacher at the intentional place they come from.A seed is planted and it blossoms in this life, if that is their karma.The fact that you and I interact, means we have Karma with one another.That is what i believe from my own experience.I chose yoga and the interpretations of Sutras and Gita into my life , partly because although coming from a Psychoanalyst Father (of the Jacques Lacan Lineage), i still felt disconnected and separated.Not to say my father himself was a vegetarian 35 years before me, and besides the path of the mind, he also has a path that took him many years in india studying different levels of meditation scriptures and yoga paths of devotion to personal divinity, which did not influence me at all until i met Sharon And David many years later.You remind me a bit of my conversations with him.(Him and I are very close and very different.)I was too much into analysing everything, and i chose a way where I listen to the moment , listen to the message coming from within without manipulating it. and i still struggle not trying to, but it's a work in progress.What E. Tolle talks about, whether he really means it or not. doesn't matter, he's not the doer, his he? He is just telling Patanjali's sutra (1-23) in a wordy way. Some will use it to be asleep , some will wake up and dream.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPg9DnMP2D4
Also i want to thank Mark from Buddha Temple, for what he added above, because it completes my point of view as well.I'm sorry if my original statement was a reaction, I'm only human, or a dragon guardian of my temple. www.jivamuktiyoga.com
Peace to you Daniel.
The world needs people like you.
And i think everyone should read your book "2012" and keep it close by like a map.
Apology
Satya
World is just everyday
Ooooooooh that looks a lot