9/11 and America's Three Poisons

I remember that Tuesday quite well, not only because it changed the course of history, but because it altered my own trajectory in a very literal way. En route from Chicago to Hartford to visit a recently-relocated, soon-to-be-ex-girlfriend, I landed in Detroit for my connecting flight, only to be notified that the second leg of my journey had been amputated by terrorists. That was the new buzzword, intoned mantra-like by the talking heads on the TV monitors around which many a confounded traveler had gathered, staring in dumb disbelief as the planes slammed into the towers, again and again. Everyone else was talking nervously on their cell phones, trying to arrange a way to get back home, or else forge ahead, overland, to their original destination.
In any case, there would be no returning to business as usual. As the twin towers and Pentagon walls crumbled, so too did America's illusions of safety, security, and separateness. These acts of violence ("attacks," as they are officially called, amidst much controversy and confusion) were the deadliest ever on US continental soil, and they introduced an unfamiliar sense of vulnerability and uncertainty to the relatively insulated American psyche. To many folks, the world suddenly seemed larger and more mysterious, populated perhaps by shadowy and sinister enemies but also filled with the prayers, support, and shared anguish of millions of allies across the globe. Beneath the grief, or perhaps because of its uniting influence, there arose a brief, hopeful sense of national and international kinship in the days after the tragedy.
Due in part to the overbearing response of the Bush administration, who immediately began speaking in Manichean absolutes of good vs. evil, the national mood quickly changed into one of fear and indignation. America's pride had been damaged, and the country needed to reassert its global superiority in a dramatic display of aggression. It would not rely on international courts of law, nor would it politely petition the world community for assistance. Instead its president would demand allegiance to the "war on terror" by threatening, "You're either with us or against us." Least of all would America seek to understand the root causes of terrorism or take seriously the complaints put forth by Bin Laden in the videotapes that surfaced after 9-11. All of these responses would have required a kind of humility and introspection with which America, the world's strongest ego structure, is largely unfamiliar.
Colors and Shadows
Indeed the earth-shaking events of nine years ago can best be understood, I believe, by thinking of the US in terms of its unique psychological profile, and by distilling the tri-colored essence of the American mindset. Some might point to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" as the three beacons that have guided our nation from its inception, and these unalienable rights would hardly be a bad place to start (or end, for that matter). But one the big lessons of 9-11 is that bright lights cast dark shadows (I speak not of clandestine groups intent on gaining and/or maintaining power, as this topic has been explored elsewhere in detail. My interest and emphasis lie with America's collective psyche and its psychological shadow, which likewise needs to be confronted if healing is to occur).
If we take a moment to peer behind the veil of Life, we see its grim counterpart in the deadliest arsenal of all time, fed by a national military budget nearly as large as that of all other countries combined. Of course, US weaponry is used less for "defense" than for offensively procuring the so-called resources needed to support the American way of life, which is centered largely around consumption. This conspicuous activity has become virtually synonymous with the Pursuit of Happiness, however noble the intention of Thomas Jefferson in using this enigmatic phrase. Its object remains elusive, as indicated by America's record rates of violent crime and incarceration, rampant use and abuse of prescription drugs and painkillers, widespread heart disease and other stress-related illnesses, epidemic obesity... As for Liberty, there is a sad irony in the fact that, partly because of their material pursuits, millions of Americans are so figuratively burdened with debt that literal imprisonment looms as a possibility.
This is to say nothing so far of the rest of the Earth community, both human and non-human, that is aversely affected by America's complexes. With this double entendre I refer not only to the military and industry, but to the media, which empower the other two through advertising and various forms of propaganda. Considering, as an example, defense contractor GE's ownership of NBC, CNBC, msnbc.com, Telemundo, and Bravo, we can safely speak of the military-industrial-media complex. While each of these on its own is unrivaled in terms of power and influence, together they have enabled the US to become the most dominant, defining force in human, if not geologic, history. One would be hard pressed to find a place on Earth not affected by at least one branch of this mighty American triumvirate.
The Three Poisons
Such sociopolitical analysis, heavy-handed if accurate, can only take us so far. To discern the deeper dimensions of the American psyche and its wounds, we must look through a more powerful, psychospiritual lens at the three main driving forces of the American enterprise. By doing so, we discover what the Buddha called the "three poisons" of greed, hatred, and delusion. Alternatively translated as desire, aversion, and ignorance, these poisons are said to be the root causes of suffering. Although interrelated, primary emphasis is placed on delusion, which gives rise to selfish desire and aversion. In the American model, desire manifests as consumerism and unbridled capitalism, hatred finds expression in militarism and violence, and delusion is represented by the omnipresent media.
In light of all this, it seems at least symbolically significant that the targets of September 2001 were the World Trade Center (representing greed) and the Pentagon (hatred), and that shortly thereafter, deadly anthrax spores were sent to various East Coast media outlets (delusion). This is certainly not to suggest that the perpetrators of these horrific acts, whatever their affiliations, were trying to teach America a hard lesson in dharma. Rather, I gesture toward a mysterious kind of logic in the universe that operates beneath the level of conscious awareness. The collective unconscious, as Jung called it, has a great deal to teach those who can interpret its archetypal and symbolic language. How else are we to extract anything of spiritual value from a tragedy that by all accounts was designed to keep the poisons pumping ever more strongly?
Between the official story (terrorist coup) and the counter-argument (global conspiracy), lies is a Middle Way that allows each of us to take some degree of responsibility for the events of 9-11, and to avoid projecting the whole of our shadow onto the evil Other. If indeed the three poisons have a firm grip on America's collective psyche, the question becomes: to what degree do they control our individual minds? Can we rid our own hearts of greed, hatred, and delusion? We can certainly try, and in our efforts, however humble or faltering, we honor both the living and the dead.
Image by The Marque, courtesy of Creative Commons license.
Tweet
- 9-15-10
- Darrin Drda's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version










Comments
Excellent points
Time for a Real Investigation
It is up to the people to decide if we need a new investigation.
We will never heal if we do not expose what really happened on that fateful day.
Think about the families of those who were lost. Think about the victims. Think about the 1 million dead Iraquis. Do they not deserve Justice?? Just because you don't see it happenings doe'nt mean it isn't required or possible.
I think we should all remember that we create our reality with our speech. We must honor those who were lost by seeking justice. This is a rite of passage for all of humanity. We must be brave enough to honor the truth and not avoid it because it makes us uneasy. We will never advance as a species if we cannot honor the truth.
Watch Building 7 Collapse and ask if you believe we should just pretend it never happened and that those responsible should be allowed to go free and profit from this Mass Murder of Innoncent civilians. http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-14/3-beams-truth-sept-11-2010
BE THE CHANGE!
-Nano
cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
Google Nano Thermite 911, Building 7
"An Elephant Never Forgets...."
That is one huge collective shadow
This article is an excerpt
Excuse me davej, but you say we need to move on???
"Moving On"
I agree.
We should not advocate a position that allows this deliberatley induced trauma to go unpunished.
It has been prophesied as well that it is up to mankind to determine whether or not we will recieve the wisdom available and make the necessary changes before the next cyclical catastrophe.
I see 9/11 as a prompt to see if we are worthy and ready to evolve consciously and do the hard inner and outer work necessary to survive and thrive as soverign souls in mortal flesh.
Thank you all for contributing to this conversation. Please keep in mind that it is necessary to debate and discuss the most critical realities of our current zeitgeist, if ever we hope to solve these riddles it will require authentic dialogue such as this.
Thank you for this article.
Now let's be sure to spread the news of the truth that is being unveiled more dramatically everyday.
-Nano
PS> Did you guys see this
3 Beams for Truth on Sept 11, 2010http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-14/3-beams-truth-sept-11-2010
cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
Google Nano Thermite 911, Building 7
"An Elephant Never Forgets...."
Im struggling to be positive but...
To the author,
For as much as I appreciate the sentiments expressed in this piece, I found it painfully naive, and fatally flawed via its dismissal of the real (as in true, as in "unofficial") causes, perpetrators, and events of that day.
Regardless of how symbolically a propos the attacks were as a statement against American hegemony and consumption, the most important aspect of the attacks is that they were the most important event of our lifetime, and perhaps in American history. They forever altered our culture, our government, our society, and they led to the deaths of millions. And the official story was the biggest lie ever told.
We will never have official confirmation or acknowledgement of the real perpetrators, but that's of little importance, and a wasted expectation. There are dozens of major operations in America's past equally nefarious, and clandestine, not the least of which is the JFK assassination. The thing is, those who want to know can find out the truth. So much of it is already known, documented, and verifiable. The problem is that truth is useless without the will to believe it.
9/11 is the litmus test for the cultural shift. Those who see through the illusion and understand what really happened belong to the evolving culture, the culture willing to see things for that they are and tell it like it is. We have gone through, or are going through, the process of iconoclasm and demythologizing. The act of joining this culture is part of the process of the political and spiritual awakening the people in this culture are all engaged in, on both a personal and cultural level. Going through the transformation, confronting and contending with the cognitive dissonance, facing both the personal and the collective Shadow, grappling with the alienation and disillusionment, and ultimately emerging on the other side with clarity and without illusion, is the psycho-spiritual "Hero's Journey" we each need to embark upon.
It IS important to know the truth, even if only for yourself. It is essential for our good intention to come from a place of clarity, and not illusion. Yes, the US, and us as its citizens, have terrible karma to face for the atrocities of a century of imperial ventures. But lets not make the mistake of believing that the attacks were a retributive act, for we have no place for the liberal guilt stream here. What was done to this nation collectively on that day by the junta that orchestrated the attacks is perhaps the greatest crime ever perpetrated against the American people, and perhaps the world. If we are guilty of anything, its letting the political process be taken away from us (if we ever had it in the first place), not knowing enough about our own history, and for many, being too cowardly to face the truth.
That's why this is so much more a deeply personal motif than any collective movement. Movements can be easily quashed. Nothing can stop human evolution, and no one can stop you from transforming. But you must, if you'll pardon the metaphor, take that red pill and go through the painful and traumatic process of being ripped from the machine ("unplugged" is a bit of an understatement). It's a long hard road, but there is light, serenity, and acceptance on the other side. Once you let go of attachment to the American myth, it ceases to cause you pain.
Eventually, the clamor raised by billions learning the truth on their own and in small groups will drown out the hoarse and wheezy sputtering of the aging officialdom still peddling their phony, preposterous Bin Laden story. Some day we'll look at them like we view Catholic priests--forever discredited by pedophilia and never to be trusted again, no matter how many robes they wear, wielding only the illusion of power, based upon a preposterous religious mythology and the omnipresent threat of eternal hellfire and damnation, long past its "sell-by" date. Likewise will the deluded politician, wielding only the illusion of power, peddling an equally cornpone American mythology, and warning of the omnipresent spectre of "the terrorist."
Be the Ball.
Charles Shaw
Author - Exile Nation
Exactly
Repost
cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
Google Nano Thermite 911, Building 7
"An Elephant Never Forgets...."
Yes I meant to repost it
Thanks for your concern, though.
Charles Shaw
Author - Exile Nation
Misunderstandings, clarifications
After reading the above comments, I feel compelled to reiterate a statement made in the article: that it is explicitly not about the "who" and "how" of the 9-11 tragedies. As interesting and important as it is to delve into these questions and discern the truth, such is not my intention here.
In my article, I am deliberately stepping outside the debate to explore a way of interpreting the events of that day that might imbue them with some significance beyond "malicious and murderous act" (which goes without saying). To extract something meaningful, one does not need to have certainty about whodunit (which in any case may never arrive), only a willingness to look within for signs of complicity. This is a basic psychological approach to empowerment and healing.
For what it's worth, I believe the the truthers have the weight of evidence on their side. But just because my cognitive waveform has not collapsed into absolute certainty does not make me naive, or dismissive, or avoidant, or less evolved. Whether leveled at me or any other agnostic, such accusations do a tremendous disservice to the truther movement by shutting down the discussion and reinforcing the "conspiracy fanatic" stereotype.
Do we not have enough fundamentalism in the world? I would like to think that we are moving beyond what philosopher Jean Gebser calls the "deficient mental" form of consciousness, which thinks in unequivocal absolutes of the "I am right and you are wrong" variety. Even in Wilber's model (derived partly from Gebser), there are at least four different ways to look at a given thing or situation: exterior-individual (science), exterior-collective (social structures), interior-individual (psychology), and interior-collective (wordviews).
While I appreciate the work being done on the exterior side of things (truthers included), the focus of both my article and my book is on the interior side of things -- not only because that's where my interest and knowledge lie, but because I believe that the exterior is overemphasized in Western (and especially American) culture. My hope is that we can move collectively toward balance, integration, and right relation. In the meantime, can we at least be respectful and kind?
Axioms
cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
Google Nano Thermite 911, Building 7
"An Elephant Never Forgets...."
Still missing the point
Pinkelephant writes: "...what actually happened and who is responsible? ... Why is this reality avoided by you? Please stop casting aspersions on the search for truth."
Let me say for the third time: my article is NOT ABOUT what happened and who is responsible. Would you run into a restaurant and accuse the waitress of "avoiding the reality" of gardening just because she is not trimming hedges at the time? Not unless you operate under the illusion that everyone in the world should be gardening, all the time.
Nowhere am I "casting aspersions on the search for truth." I happen to strongly support a serious and independent investigation into 9-11, but this is completely irrelevant to the point I'm making in the article. My focus is not scientific or political but psychospiritual. You are quite welcome to regard such an approach as "fluff" -- on that point we can agree to disagree -- but you are not welcome to paint me as anti-reason just because I don't share your passion for a particular subject.
To be perfectly clear: I applaud your passion and support truth-seeking (to which I've dedicated my life energy and savings). I also value wisdom and spirituality, which I do not see as antagonistic to knowledge and rationality. In fact, I view science and spirit as interdependent and mutually enhancing. Both are necessary for individual and collective transformation. For the reasons I give in the comment above, my article is focused on the spiritual or interior side, which does not make the other side less crucial.
Miscommunication
Miscommunication.
I did not intend my above response to seem as though it were directed at the author. I actually very much enjoyed and agree with this article. It was meant to be directed at the comment the gentlemen above a few posts made about moving on. Sorry guys, I did not mean to come off so harsh. I just get so sick of people who avoid things and claim that it is 'spiritual' to do so.
Please forgive my not clarifying who I was addressing clearly.
Thank you for your contribution and I look forward to your future articles.
-Nano
cargocollective.com/pinkelephantcollective
Google Nano Thermite 911, Building 7
"An Elephant Never Forgets...."
There's bias everywhere...only need to seek it out.
Simply beautifully expressed
Inspiration
Bryan,
Thanks for your patronage! I hope you enjoy the book and would welcome your feedback.
Indeed, Tarnas is the co-founder of the Philosophy, Cosmology and Consciousness program of which I am a graduate (and a continuing fan, as I still occasionally sit in on classes, including those taught by Rick). His work has had quite an influence on me personally and on my own writing, although I cannot ever hope to approach the erudition and level of scholarship of either of his major books (the Epilogue of The Passion of the Western Mind, which succeeds as a stand-alone piece, is particularly brilliant). As you'll see, my book is far less academic, although hopefully inspiring in its own way.
Yours in synchronicity,
-D
My Little Rock Jobs